在我的应用程序中,我具有这样的组件:
const MyComponent = props => {
const { attrOneDefault, attrTwoDefault, formControl } = props;
const [inputValue, setInputValue] = useState({
attr_one: attrOneDefault,
attr_two: attrTwoDefault
});
const getValue = ( attr ) => {
return inputValue[attr];
}
const setValue = ( attr, val ) => {
if( attr === 'attr_one' ) {
if( val === 'bar' && getValue(attr) !== 'foo' ) {
val = 'foo bar';
}
}
setInputValue( {...inputValue, [attr]: val} );
}
useEffect( () => {
if( formControl ) {
Object.keys(inputValue).forEach( attribute => {
formControl.subscribeToValueCollecting( attribute, () => {
return getValue(attribute);
});
formControl.subscribeToValueChange( attribute, ( value ) => {
setValue( attribute, value );
return true;
});
});
}
return () => {
if( formControl ) {
Object.keys(inputValue).forEach( attribute => formControl.unsubscribe(attribute) );
}
}
}, []);
return (
<div class="form-field">
<input
type="text"
value={getValue('attr_one')}
onChange={ e => setValue('attr_one', e.target.value)}
/>
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={getValue('attr_two')}
onChange={ e => setValue('attr_two', !!e.target.checked)}
/>
</div>
);
}
在内部函数setValue
和getValue
中,我始终在inputValue
中使用默认值-无法在此函数中获取更新状态。我如何组织我的代码来解决这个问题?
P。
1)使用useCallback,我得到相同的结果:
const getValue = useCallback( ( attr ) => {
return inputValue[attr];
}, [inputValue]);
const setValue = useCallback( ( attr, val ) => {
if( attr === 'attr_one' ) {
if( val === 'bar' && getValue(attr) !== 'foo' ) {
val = 'foo bar';
}
}
setInputValue( {...inputValue, [attr]: val} );
}, [inputValue]);
2)使用useEffect函数时,setValue
和getValue
在第一次渲染时不可用:
let getValue, setValue;
useEffect( () => {
getValue = ( attr ) => {
return inputValue[attr];
}
setValue = ( attr, val ) => {
if( attr === 'attr_one' ) {
if( val === 'bar' && getValue(attr) !== 'foo' ) {
val = 'foo bar';
}
}
setInputValue( {...inputValue, [attr]: val} );
}
}, [inputValue]);
答案 0 :(得分:1)
编写custom hooks,将您的逻辑提取到单独的代码单元中。由于状态更改部分取决于先前的状态,因此应调用useReducer()
而不是useState()
来简化实现,并且状态更改是原子的:
const useAccessors = initialState => {
const [state, dispatch] = useReducer((oldState, [attr, val]) => {
if (attr === 'attr_one') {
if (val === 'bar' && getValue(attr) !== 'foo') {
val = 'foo bar';
}
}
// this is important! your reference must be preserved (ew)
oldState[attr] = val;
return oldState;
}, initialState);
const getValue = useCallback(
attr => state[attr],
[state]
);
const setValue = useCallback(
(attr, val) => {
dispatch([attr, val]);
},
[dispatch]
);
return { getValue, setValue, state };
};
我通常不建议更改状态对象,但是在这种情况下,由于您的useEffect()
引用不断变化,因此您的state
效率很低。如果有人知道如何解决此问题而不违反exhaustive-deps
,请在下面发表评论。
现在您的useEffect()
正在从第二个参数中删除依赖项。尽管有时会有有效的用例,但通常只会导致您当前遇到的问题。
我们也将您的useEffect()
移入自定义钩子并进行修复:
const useFormControl = (formControl, { getValue, setValue, state }) => {
useEffect(() => {
if (formControl) {
const keys = Object.keys(state);
keys.forEach(attribute => {
formControl.subscribeToValueCollecting(attribute, () => {
return getValue(attribute));
});
formControl.subscribeToValueChange(attribute, value => {
setValue(attribute, value);
return true;
});
});
return () => {
keys.forEach(attribute => {
formControl.unsubscribe(attribute);
});
};
}
}, [formControl, getValue, setValue, state]);
};
由于getValue
和setValue
是已记忆的,并且state
是常量可变引用,因此实际更改的唯一依赖项是formControl
,这很好。
将所有这些放在一起,我们得到:
const MyComponent = props =>
const { attrOneDefault, attrTwoDefault, formControl } = props;
const { getValue, setValue, state } = useAccessors({
attr_one: attrOneDefault,
attr_two: attrTwoDefault
});
useFormControl(formControl, { getValue, setValue, state });
return (
<div class="form-field">
<input
type="text"
value={getValue('attr_one')}
onChange={e => setValue('attr_one', e.target.value)}
/>
<input
type="checkbox"
checked={getValue('attr_two')}
onChange={e => setValue('attr_two', e.target.checked)}
/>
</div>
);
};
答案 1 :(得分:0)
尝试一下:
const getValue = ( attr ) => {
return inputValue[attr];
}
const getValueRef = useRef(getValue)
const setValue = ( attr, val ) => {
setInputValue( inputValue =>{
if( attr === 'attr_one' ) {
if( val === 'bar' && inputValue[attr] !== 'foo' ) {
val = 'foo bar';
}
}
return {...inputValue, [attr]: val} );
}
}
useEffect(()=>{
getValueRef.current=getValue
})
useEffect( () => {
const getCurrentValue = (attr)=>getValueRef.current(attr)
if( formControl ) {
Object.keys(inputValue).forEach( attribute => {
formControl.subscribeToValueCollecting( attribute, () => {
return getCurrentValue(attribute);
});
formControl.subscribeToValueChange( attribute, ( value ) => {
setValue( attribute, value );
return true;
});
});
}
return () => {
if( formControl ) {
Object.keys(inputValue).forEach( attribute => formControl.unsubscribe(attribute) );
}
}
}, []);