您对如何使用NetworkBoundResource和Kotlin协程实现存储库模式有任何想法吗?我知道我们可以与GlobalScope一起启动协程,但这可能会导致协程泄漏。我想将 viewModelScope 作为参数传递,但是在实现方面有点棘手(因为我的存储库不知道任何ViewModel的CoroutineScope)。
abstract class NetworkBoundResource<ResultType, RequestType>
@MainThread constructor(
private val coroutineScope: CoroutineScope
) {
private val result = MediatorLiveData<Resource<ResultType>>()
init {
result.value = Resource.loading(null)
@Suppress("LeakingThis")
val dbSource = loadFromDb()
result.addSource(dbSource) { data ->
result.removeSource(dbSource)
if (shouldFetch(data)) {
fetchFromNetwork(dbSource)
} else {
result.addSource(dbSource) { newData ->
setValue(Resource.success(newData))
}
}
}
}
@MainThread
private fun setValue(newValue: Resource<ResultType>) {
if (result.value != newValue) {
result.value = newValue
}
}
private fun fetchFromNetwork(dbSource: LiveData<ResultType>) {
val apiResponse = createCall()
result.addSource(dbSource) { newData ->
setValue(Resource.loading(newData))
}
result.addSource(apiResponse) { response ->
result.removeSource(apiResponse)
result.removeSource(dbSource)
when (response) {
is ApiSuccessResponse -> {
coroutineScope.launch(Dispatchers.IO) {
saveCallResult(processResponse(response))
withContext(Dispatchers.Main) {
result.addSource(loadFromDb()) { newData ->
setValue(Resource.success(newData))
}
}
}
}
is ApiEmptyResponse -> {
coroutineScope.launch(Dispatchers.Main) {
result.addSource(loadFromDb()) { newData ->
setValue(Resource.success(newData))
}
}
}
is ApiErrorResponse -> {
onFetchFailed()
result.addSource(dbSource) { newData ->
setValue(Resource.error(response.errorMessage, newData))
}
}
}
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
@ N1hk的答案正确,这只是一个不使用flatMapConcat
运算符的实现(此刻它被标记为FlowPreview
)
@FlowPreview
@ExperimentalCoroutinesApi
abstract class NetworkBoundResource<ResultType, RequestType> {
fun asFlow() = flow {
emit(Resource.loading(null))
val dbValue = loadFromDb().first()
if (shouldFetch(dbValue)) {
emit(Resource.loading(dbValue))
when (val apiResponse = fetchFromNetwork()) {
is ApiSuccessResponse -> {
saveNetworkResult(processResponse(apiResponse))
emitAll(loadFromDb().map { Resource.success(it) })
}
is ApiErrorResponse -> {
onFetchFailed()
emitAll(loadFromDb().map { Resource.error(apiResponse.errorMessage, it) })
}
}
} else {
emitAll(loadFromDb().map { Resource.success(it) })
}
}
protected open fun onFetchFailed() {
// Implement in sub-classes to handle errors
}
@WorkerThread
protected open fun processResponse(response: ApiSuccessResponse<RequestType>) = response.body
@WorkerThread
protected abstract suspend fun saveNetworkResult(item: RequestType)
@MainThread
protected abstract fun shouldFetch(data: ResultType?): Boolean
@MainThread
protected abstract fun loadFromDb(): Flow<ResultType>
@MainThread
protected abstract suspend fun fetchFromNetwork(): ApiResponse<RequestType>
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这就是我使用livedata-ktx
工件的方式;无需传递任何CoroutineScope。该类也只使用一种类型而不是两种类型(例如ResultType / RequestType),因为我总是总是在其他地方使用适配器来映射它们。
import androidx.lifecycle.LiveData
import androidx.lifecycle.liveData
import androidx.lifecycle.map
import nihk.core.Resource
// Adapted from: https://developer.android.com/topic/libraries/architecture/coroutines
abstract class NetworkBoundResource<T> {
fun asLiveData() = liveData<Resource<T>> {
emit(Resource.Loading(null))
if (shouldFetch(query())) {
val disposable = emitSource(queryObservable().map { Resource.Loading(it) })
try {
val fetchedData = fetch()
// Stop the previous emission to avoid dispatching the saveCallResult as `Resource.Loading`.
disposable.dispose()
saveFetchResult(fetchedData)
// Re-establish the emission as `Resource.Success`.
emitSource(queryObservable().map { Resource.Success(it) })
} catch (e: Exception) {
onFetchFailed(e)
emitSource(queryObservable().map { Resource.Error(e, it) })
}
} else {
emitSource(queryObservable().map { Resource.Success(it) })
}
}
abstract suspend fun query(): T
abstract fun queryObservable(): LiveData<T>
abstract suspend fun fetch(): T
abstract suspend fun saveFetchResult(data: T)
open fun onFetchFailed(exception: Exception) = Unit
open fun shouldFetch(data: T) = true
}
就像@CommonsWare在评论中说的那样,最好公开一个Flow<T>
。这是我尝试提出的方法。请注意,我尚未在生产中使用此代码,因此请当心买家。
import kotlinx.coroutines.flow.*
import nihk.core.Resource
abstract class NetworkBoundResource<T> {
fun asFlow(): Flow<Resource<T>> = flow {
val flow = query()
.onStart { emit(Resource.Loading<T>(null)) }
.flatMapConcat { data ->
if (shouldFetch(data)) {
emit(Resource.Loading(data))
try {
saveFetchResult(fetch())
query().map { Resource.Success(it) }
} catch (throwable: Throwable) {
onFetchFailed(throwable)
query().map { Resource.Error(throwable, it) }
}
} else {
query().map { Resource.Success(it) }
}
}
emitAll(flow)
}
abstract fun query(): Flow<T>
abstract suspend fun fetch(): T
abstract suspend fun saveFetchResult(data: T)
open fun onFetchFailed(throwable: Throwable) = Unit
open fun shouldFetch(data: T) = true
}
答案 2 :(得分:0)
我是Kotlin Coroutine的新手。我本周刚遇到这个问题。
我认为,如果您采用上述帖子中提到的存储库模式,我的意见是随时将 CoroutineScope 传递给 NetworkBoundResource 。 CoroutineScope 可以是存储库中函数的参数之一,该函数将返回LiveData,例如:
0 == false
在ViewModel中调用 getData()时,将内置范围 viewmodelscope 作为CoroutineScope传递,因此 NetworkBoundResource 将在< strong> viewmodelscope 并绑定到Viewmodel的生命周期。 ViewModel 失效时, NetworkBoundResource 中的协程将被取消,这将是一个好处。
要使用内置作用域 viewmodelscope ,请不要忘记在build.gradle中添加以下内容。
true