在清理旧的/未使用的资源时，有时我们可能会遇到删除已使用/当前的AMI的麻烦。 必须防止意外删除/注销AMI。
我当时正在考虑向AMI添加一个标签，如果该标签存在，则永远不应删除它。
以类似于实例终止保护的方式， 我希望CERTAIN AMI具有双重故障保护机制，以避免意外删除。
请提出同样的方法。
答案 0 :(得分：2)
基于Actions, Resources, and Condition Keys for Amazon EC2 - AWS Identity and Access Management，看来df <- structure(list(Class = structure(c(1L, 4L, 3L, 5L, 2L), .Label = c("Goal",
"MapClass", "Password", "TreeApp", "XMLParser"), class = "factor"),
Branch = c(12L, 20L, 4L, 9L, 33L), LA_type = structure(c(2L,
1L, 2L, 1L, 2L), .Label = c("Rugged", "Smooth"), class = "factor"),
Method_type = structure(c(4L, 1L, 2L, 1L, 3L), .Label = c("constructor",
"private", "public", "public_static"), class = "factor"),
Method_call = structure(c(1L, 2L, 1L, 2L, 1L), .Label = c("never_called",
"none"), class = "factor"), Branch_type = structure(c(4L,
1L, 2L, 5L, 3L), .Label = c("IF_ICMPGE", "IFEQ", "IFGT",
"IFNE", "IFNONNULL"), class = "factor"), Branch_condition = c(TRUE,
FALSE, FALSE, TRUE, FALSE), Tested_parameter = structure(c(3L,
2L, 2L, 3L, 1L), .Label = c("double", "int", "String"), class = "factor")),
class = "data.frame", row.names = c(NA, -5L))
没有任何条件键。
因此，看来不可能仅将此命令限制于某些AMI或标签。
一些选项：