我有一个csv，具有600多个列和数千行。原始文件包含更多的客户和部门，但是此example包括关键部分。
注意：我从Site和A_Loc1列派生了B_Loc1列，以便更轻松地对行进行比较和分组，但这不是必需的。如果可以在没有此情况的情况下执行groupby，那么我可以接受其他方法。
我需要根据Cust_ID和Site比较来自不同行和列的日期。因此，例如，确认A_Date1小于B_Date1，但仅对于相同的Cust_ID和Site值。
因此，对于Cust_ID 100和Site CA2.2，A_Date1是8/1/2015，而B_Date1是6/15/2018 ：
if A_Date1 > B_Date1:
df['Result'] = "Fail"
else:
result = ""
在上述情况下，由于A_Date1小于B_Date1，因此无需采取任何措施。
但是，对于Cust_ID 100和Site CA2.0，A_Date1是7/1/2019，而B_Date1是{{1 }}，因此对于12/15/2018行，其中Result是Fail的{{1}}行，Dep B列应为Site。
我愿意采用任何有效，灵活的方法来执行此操作，但是，我还需要对不同的行和列进行其他比较，但这应该使我入门。
预期结果：
CA2.0我尝试过的事情：
+----+----------+-----------+-------+-------------+--------+-------------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----------+----------+------------+------------+-----------+------------+----------+-----------+
| | Result | Cust_ID | Dep | Order_Num | Site | Rec_Date1 | Rec_DateX | A_Date1 | A_Loc1 | A_DateX | B_Loc1 | B_Date1 | B_Date2 | B_DateX | C_Date1 | C_Loc1 | C_DateX |
|----+----------+-----------+-------+-------------+--------+-------------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----------+----------+------------+------------+-----------+------------+----------+-----------|
| 0 | | 100 | A | 1 | CA2.2 | | | 8/1/2015 | CA2.2 | | | | | | | | |
| 1 | | 100 | A | 2 | CA2.0 | | | 7/1/2019 | CA2.0 | 8/21/2019 | | | | | | | |
| 2 | | 100 | B | 1 | CA2.2 | | | | | | CA2.2 | 6/15/2018 | 6/15/2016 | 8/1/2019 | | | |
| 3 | Fail | 100 | B | 2 | CA2.0 | | | | | | CA2.0 | 12/15/2018 | 12/15/2016 | | | | |
| 4 | Fail | 100 | B | 3 | CA2.0 | | | | | | CA2.0 | 12/15/2018 | 12/15/2016 | 8/21/2019 | | | |
| 5 | | 100 | C | 1 | CA2.2 | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2016 | CA2.2 | |
| 6 | | 100 | C | 2 | CA2.0 | | | | | | | | | | 12/15/2017 | CA2.0 | 8/21/2019 |
| 7 | | 100 | Rec | | | 6/12/2019 | 8/1/2019 | | | | | | | | | | |
| 8 | | 200 | A | 1 | CA2.2 | | | 8/1/2015 | CA2.2 | | | | | | | | |
| 9 | | 200 | A | 2 | CA2.0 | | | 7/1/2015 | CA2.0 | 8/21/2019 | | | | | | | |
| 10 | | 200 | B | 1 | CA2.2 | | | | | | CA2.2 | 6/15/2018 | 6/15/2016 | 8/1/2019 | | | |
| 11 | | 200 | B | 2 | CA2.0 | | | | | | CA2.0 | 12/15/2018 | 12/15/2016 | | | | |
| 12 | | 200 | B | 3 | CA2.0 | | | | | | CA2.0 | 12/15/2018 | 12/15/2016 | 8/21/2019 | | | |
| 13 | | 200 | C | 1 | CA2.2 | | | | | | | | | | 6/15/2016 | CA2.2 | |
| 14 | | 200 | C | 2 | CA2.0 | | | | | | | | | | 12/15/2017 | CA2.0 | 8/21/2019 |
| 15 | | 200 | Rec | | | 6/12/2019 | 8/1/2019 | | | | | | | | | | |
+----+----------+-----------+-------+-------------+--------+-------------+-------------+-----------+----------+-----------+----------+------------+------------+-----------+------------+----------+-----------+
更新：
我已经找到了这两个特定列（# Returns: ValueError: Length of values does not match length of index
df['Result'] = df.loc[df.A_Date1 < df.B_Date1].groupby(['Cust_ID','Site'],as_index=False)
# Returns: ValueError: Length of values does not match length of index
df["Result"] = df.loc[(((df["A_Date1"] != "N/A")
& (df["B_Date1"] != "N/A"))
& (df.A_Date1 < df.B_Date1))].groupby([
'Cust_ID','Site'],as_index=False)
# Returns: ValueError: unknown type str224
conditions = "(x['A_Date1'].notna()) & (x['B_Date1'].notna()) & (x['A_Date1'] < x['B_Date1'])"
df["Result"] = df.groupby(['Cust_ID','Site']).apply(lambda x: pd.eval(conditions))
# TypeError: incompatible index of inserted column with frame index
df = df[df.Dep != 'Rec']
df['Result'] = df.groupby(['Cust_ID','Site'],as_index = False).apply(lambda x: (x['A_Date1'].notna()) & (x['B_Date1'].notna()) & (x['A_Date1'] < x['B_Date1']))
# This produces FALSE for all rows
grouped_df = df.groupby(['Cust_ID','Site']).apply(lambda x: (x['A_Date1'].notna()) & (x['B_Date1'].notna()) & (x['A_Date1'] < x['B_Date1']))
和A_Loc1）的解决方案。首先，将这些列转换为B_Loc1，添加datetime列，分组并执行比较。
但是，我需要比较的原始文件中有大约50列。最好遍历列（或字典）列表以执行这些步骤。
Result答案 0 :(得分：0)
打算发布此解决方案，希望找到更优雅和可扩展的实现。
import pandas as pd
import numpy as np
import os
data = [[100,'A','1','','','8/1/2015','CA2.2','','','','','','','',''],
[100,'A','2','','','7/1/2019','CA2.0','8/21/2019','','','','','','',''],
[100,'B','1','','','','','','CA2.2','6/15/2018','6/15/2016','8/1/2019','','',''],
[100,'B','2','','','','','','CA2.0','12/15/2018','12/15/2016','','','',''],
[100,'B','3','','','','','','CA2.0','12/15/2018','12/15/2016','8/21/2019','','',''],
[100,'C','1','','','','','','','','','','6/15/2016','CA2.2',''],
[100,'C','2','','','','','','','','','','12/15/2017','CA2.0','8/21/2019'],
[100,'Rec','','6/12/2019','8/1/2019','','','','','','','','','',''],
[200,'A','1','','','8/1/2015','CA2.2','','','','','','','',''],
[200,'A','2','','','7/1/2015','CA2.0','8/21/2019','','','','','','',''],
[200,'B','1','','','','','','CA2.2','6/15/2018','6/15/2016','8/1/2019','','',''],
[200,'B','2','','','','','','CA2.0','12/15/2018','12/15/2016','','','',''],
[200,'B','3','','','','','','CA2.0','12/15/2018','12/15/2016','8/21/2019','','',''],
[200,'C','1','','','','','','','','','','6/15/2016','CA2.2',''],
[200,'C','2','','','','','','','','','','12/15/2017','CA2.0','8/21/2019'],
[200,'Rec','','6/12/2019','8/1/2019','','','','','','','','','','']]
df = pd.DataFrame(data,columns=['Cust_ID','Dep','Order_Num','Rec_Date1',
'Rec_DateX','A_Date1','A_Loc1','A_DateX',
'B_Loc1','B_Date1','B_Date2','B_DateX',
'C_Date1','C_Loc1','C_DateX'])
# replace blanks with np.NaN
df.replace(r"^s*$", np.nan, regex=True, inplace = True)
## Convert all date columns to datetime, replace with NaN if error
df['A_Date1'] = pd.to_datetime(df['A_Date1'], errors ="coerce")
df['B_Date1'] = pd.to_datetime(df['B_Date1'], errors ="coerce")
# Add Site and Result column
df.insert(loc=4, column="Site", value=np.nan)
df.insert(loc=0, column="Result", value=np.nan)
# Populate Site column based on related column
df.loc[df["A_Loc1"].notna(),
"Site"] = df["A_Loc1"]
df.loc[df["B_Loc1"].notna(),
"Site"] = df["B_Loc1"]
df.loc[df["C_Loc1"].notna(),
"Site"] = df["C_Loc1"]
# groupby Cust_ID and Site, and fill A_Date1 forward and back
df['A_Date1'] = df.groupby(['Cust_ID','Site'], sort=False)['A_Date1'].apply(lambda x: x.ffill().bfill())
# Perform comparison
df.loc[(((df["A_Date1"].notna()) & (df["B_Date1"].notna()))
& ((df["A_Date1"]) > (df["B_Date1"]))),
"Result"] = "Fail"