假设我有几个不同类的ObservableCollections:
public class Employee
{
public int age { get; set; }
}
public class Student
{
public int age { get; set; }
}
ObservableCollection<Employee> employees = ...;
ObservableCollection<Student> students = ...;
现在我需要一个函数来计算这些集合的平均年龄:
int employeeAveAge = GetAverageAge(employees, e => e.age);
int studentAveAge = GetAverageAge(students, s => s.age);
如何编写函数体?我不熟悉Action / Fun委托,有人建议我传递一个lambda作为函数的参数
我不使用内置LINQ Average(),因为我想学习将lambda传递给函数的用法
答案 0 :(得分:3)
我完全取消了这个功能,只需使用:
int employeeAge = (int)employees.Average(e => e.age);
int studentAge = (int)students.Average(e => e.age);
编辑: 将返回和强制转换添加到int(Average返回一个double)。
答案 1 :(得分:3)
该功能将是这样的(未经测试):
public int GetAverageAge<T>(IEnumerable<T> list, Func<T,int> ageFunc)
{
int accum = 0;
int counter = 0;
foreach(T item in list)
{
accum += ageFunc(item);
counter++;
}
return accum/counter;
}
您可以改用LINQ Average
方法:
public int GetAverageAge<T>(IEnumerable<T> list, Func<T,int> ageFunc)
{
return (int)list.Average(ageFunc);
}
答案 2 :(得分:2)
你可以这样做:
double GetAverageAge<T>(IEnumerable<T> persons, Func<T, int> propertyAccessor)
{
double acc = 0.0;
int count = 0;
foreach (var person in persons)
{
acc += propertyAccessor(person);
++count;
}
return acc / count;
}
作为替代方案,考虑使用LINQ,它已经提供了类似的内容。
答案 3 :(得分:0)
为什么不为此使用LINQ?
employees.Select(e => e.age).Average()
students.Select(s => s.age).Average()
答案 4 :(得分:0)
I Would do it this way for a normal list not sure about observable collection :
List<Employee> employees = new List<Employee>
{
new Employee{age = 12},
new Employee{age = 14}};
Func<List<Employee>, int> func2 = (b) => GetAverageAge(b);
private static int GetAverageAge(List<Employee> employees)
{
return employees.Select(employee => employee.age).Average; //Thats quicker i guess :)
}