public class RollingRequests
{
private const int DefaultNumSimultaneousRequests = 10;
private readonly HttpClient _client; // Don't worry about disposing see https://stackoverflow.com/questions/15705092/do-httpclient-and-httpclienthandler-have-to-be-disposed
private readonly HttpCompletionOption _httpCompletionOption;
private readonly int _numSimultaneousRequests;
public RollingRequests() : this(DefaultNumSimultaneousRequests)
{
}
public RollingRequests(int windowSize) : this(new HttpClient(), windowSize)
{
}
public RollingRequests(HttpClient client, int numSimultaneousRequests, HttpCompletionOption httpCompletionOption = HttpCompletionOption.ResponseContentRead)
{
_client = client;
_numSimultaneousRequests = numSimultaneousRequests;
_httpCompletionOption = httpCompletionOption;
}
public async Task ExecuteAsync(List<string> urls, CancellationToken cancellationToken, Action<HttpResponseHeaders, string> requestCallback = null)
{
var nextIndex = 0;
var activeTasks = new List<Task<Tuple<string, HttpResponseMessage>>>();
var startingIndex = Math.Min(_numSimultaneousRequests, urls.Count);
for (nextIndex = 0; nextIndex < startingIndex; nextIndex++)
{
activeTasks.Add(RequestUrlAsync(urls[nextIndex], cancellationToken));
}
while (activeTasks.Count > 0)
{
var finishedTask = await Task.WhenAny(activeTasks).ConfigureAwait(false);
activeTasks.Remove(finishedTask);
var retryUrl = await ProcessTask(await finishedTask, requestCallback).ConfigureAwait(false);
// If retrying, add the URL to the end of the queue
if (retryUrl != null)
{
urls.Add(retryUrl);
}
if (nextIndex < urls.Count)
{
activeTasks.Add(RequestUrlAsync(urls[nextIndex], cancellationToken));
nextIndex++;
}
}
}
private async Task<string> ProcessTask(Tuple<string, HttpResponseMessage> result, Action<HttpResponseHeaders, string> requestCallback = null)
{
var url = result.Item1;
using (var response = result.Item2)
{
if (!response.IsSuccessStatusCode)
{
return url;
}
if (requestCallback != null)
{
string content = null;
if (_httpCompletionOption == HttpCompletionOption.ResponseContentRead)
{
content = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync().ConfigureAwait(false);
}
requestCallback(response.Headers, content);
}
return null;
}
}
private async Task<Tuple<string, HttpResponseMessage>> RequestUrlAsync(string url, CancellationToken ct)
{
var response = await _client.GetAsync(url, _httpCompletionOption, ct).ConfigureAwait(false);
return new Tuple<string, HttpResponseMessage>(url, response);
}
}
这是一个允许X个同时请求同时进行的类。当我对此类进行单元测试时,我对每个请求赋予HttpClient延迟的最小数量是HttpClient,如果我有5个请求,则初始activeTasks.Add
将花费5秒,这向我暗示RequestUrlAsync不是真正的异步。>
有人可以发现问题吗?
编辑: 这就是我嘲笑的客户端的睡眠方式
_messageHandlerMock
.Protected()
.Setup<Task<HttpResponseMessage>>(MethodToMoq, ItExpr.IsAny<HttpRequestMessage>(), ItExpr.IsAny<CancellationToken>())
.Callback(() => Thread.Sleep(1000))
.ReturnsAsync(callback)
.Verifiable();
答案 0 :(得分:0)
(如果提供了Minimal, Reproducible Example,回答起来会更容易)
将Thread.Sleep
与异步代码混合并不是一个好主意,因为这是一个阻塞调用。
还应避免嘲弄内部。
下面是一个简单的测试示例,它需要大约1秒钟来执行10个请求:
async Task Test()
{
var httpClient = new HttpClient(new TestHttpMessageHandler());
var ticks = Environment.TickCount;
await Task.WhenAll(Enumerable.Range(0, 10).Select(_ => httpClient.GetAsync("https://stackoverflow.com/")));
Console.WriteLine($"{Environment.TickCount - ticks}ms");
}
class TestHttpMessageHandler : HttpMessageHandler
{
protected override async Task<HttpResponseMessage> SendAsync(HttpRequestMessage request, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
await Task.Delay(1000);
return new HttpResponseMessage();
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我用实际的网址测试了您的课程RollingRequests
,并按预期工作。然后,我将await _client.GetAsync(...
替换为await Task.Delay(1000)
,然后按预期继续工作。然后用Thread.Sleep(1000)
替换同一行,并复制您的问题。
道德课:避免在运行异步代码时阻塞当前线程!