我写了一个基准来计算内存带宽:
#include <benchmark/benchmark.h>
double sum_array(double* v, long n)
{
double s = 0;
for (long i =0 ; i < n; ++i) {
s += v[i];
}
return s;
}
void BM_MemoryBandwidth(benchmark::State& state) {
long n = state.range(0);
double* v = (double*) malloc(state.range(0)*sizeof(double));
for (auto _ : state) {
benchmark::DoNotOptimize(sum_array(v, n));
}
free(v);
state.SetComplexityN(state.range(0));
state.SetBytesProcessed(int64_t(state.range(0))*int64_t(state.iterations())*sizeof(double));
}
BENCHMARK(BM_MemoryBandwidth)->RangeMultiplier(2)->Range(1<<5, 1<<23)->Complexity(benchmark::oN);
BENCHMARK_MAIN();
我用
进行编译g++-9 -masm=intel -fverbose-asm -S -g -O3 -ffast-math -march=native --std=c++17 -I/usr/local/include memory_bandwidth.cpp
这会从RAM中产生一堆动作,然后addpd
说的一些perf
指令很热,因此我进入生成的asm并将其删除,然后通过组装并链接
$ g++-9 -c memory_bandwidth.s -o memory_bandwidth.o
$ g++-9 memory_bandwidth.o -o memory_bandwidth.x -L/usr/local/lib -lbenchmark -lbenchmark_main -pthread -fPIC
这时,获得我期望的perf
输出:数据移入xmm
寄存器,指针的增量以及循环结束时的jmp
: / p>
一切都很好,直到这里。现在,这里的事情变得很奇怪:
我询问我的硬件,内存带宽是多少
$ sudo lshw -class memory
*-memory
description: System Memory
physical id: 3c
slot: System board or motherboard
size: 16GiB
*-bank:1
description: DIMM DDR4 Synchronous 2400 MHz (0.4 ns)
vendor: AMI
physical id: 1
slot: ChannelA-DIMM1
size: 8GiB
width: 64 bits
clock: 2400MHz (0.4ns)
因此,我最多应该获得8个字节* 2.4 GHz = 19.2 GB /秒。 但是相反,我得到了48 GB /秒:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Time CPU Iterations UserCounters...
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BM_MemoryBandwidth/32 6.43 ns 6.43 ns 108045392 bytes_per_second=37.0706G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/64 11.6 ns 11.6 ns 60101462 bytes_per_second=40.9842G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/128 21.4 ns 21.4 ns 32667394 bytes_per_second=44.5464G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/256 47.6 ns 47.6 ns 14712204 bytes_per_second=40.0884G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/512 86.9 ns 86.9 ns 8057225 bytes_per_second=43.9169G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/1024 165 ns 165 ns 4233063 bytes_per_second=46.1437G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/2048 322 ns 322 ns 2173012 bytes_per_second=47.356G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/4096 636 ns 636 ns 1099074 bytes_per_second=47.9781G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/8192 1264 ns 1264 ns 553898 bytes_per_second=48.3047G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/16384 2524 ns 2524 ns 277224 bytes_per_second=48.3688G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/32768 5035 ns 5035 ns 138843 bytes_per_second=48.4882G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/65536 10058 ns 10058 ns 69578 bytes_per_second=48.5455G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/131072 20103 ns 20102 ns 34832 bytes_per_second=48.5802G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/262144 40185 ns 40185 ns 17420 bytes_per_second=48.6035G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/524288 80351 ns 80347 ns 8708 bytes_per_second=48.6171G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/1048576 160855 ns 160851 ns 4353 bytes_per_second=48.5699G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/2097152 321657 ns 321643 ns 2177 bytes_per_second=48.5787G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/4194304 648490 ns 648454 ns 1005 bytes_per_second=48.1915G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth/8388608 1307549 ns 1307485 ns 502 bytes_per_second=47.8017G/s
BM_MemoryBandwidth_BigO 0.16 N 0.16 N
BM_MemoryBandwidth_RMS 1 % 1 %
我对内存带宽的误解是什么使我的计算结果出错了2倍以上?
(另外,这是一种疯狂的工作流程,可以凭经验确定我有多少内存带宽。有没有更好的方法?)
删除添加说明后,sum_array
的完整asm:
_Z9sum_arrayPdl:
.LVL0:
.LFB3624:
.file 1 "example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp"
.loc 1 5 1 view -0
.cfi_startproc
.loc 1 6 5 view .LVU1
.loc 1 7 5 view .LVU2
.LBB1545:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:7: for (long i =0 ; i < n; ++i) {
.loc 1 7 24 is_stmt 0 view .LVU3
test rsi, rsi # n
jle .L7 #,
lea rax, -1[rsi] # tmp105,
cmp rax, 1 # tmp105,
jbe .L8 #,
mov rdx, rsi # bnd.299, n
shr rdx # bnd.299
sal rdx, 4 # tmp107,
mov rax, rdi # ivtmp.311, v
add rdx, rdi # _44, v
pxor xmm0, xmm0 # vect_s_10.306
.LVL1:
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L5:
.loc 1 8 9 is_stmt 1 discriminator 2 view .LVU4
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:8: s += v[i];
.loc 1 8 11 is_stmt 0 discriminator 2 view .LVU5
movupd xmm2, XMMWORD PTR [rax] # tmp115, MEM[base: _24, offset: 0B]
add rax, 16 # ivtmp.311,
.loc 1 8 11 discriminator 2 view .LVU6
cmp rax, rdx # ivtmp.311, _44
jne .L5 #,
movapd xmm1, xmm0 # tmp110, vect_s_10.306
unpckhpd xmm1, xmm0 # tmp110, vect_s_10.306
mov rax, rsi # tmp.301, n
and rax, -2 # tmp.301,
test sil, 1 # n,
je .L10 #,
.L3:
.LVL2:
.loc 1 8 9 is_stmt 1 view .LVU7
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:8: s += v[i];
.loc 1 8 11 is_stmt 0 view .LVU8
addsd xmm0, QWORD PTR [rdi+rax*8] # <retval>, *_3
.LVL3:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:7: for (long i =0 ; i < n; ++i) {
.loc 1 7 5 view .LVU9
inc rax # i
.LVL4:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:7: for (long i =0 ; i < n; ++i) {
.loc 1 7 24 view .LVU10
cmp rsi, rax # n, i
jle .L1 #,
.loc 1 8 9 is_stmt 1 view .LVU11
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:8: s += v[i];
.loc 1 8 11 is_stmt 0 view .LVU12
addsd xmm0, QWORD PTR [rdi+rax*8] # <retval>, *_6
.LVL5:
.loc 1 8 11 view .LVU13
ret
.LVL6:
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L7:
.loc 1 8 11 view .LVU14
.LBE1545:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:6: double s = 0;
.loc 1 6 12 view .LVU15
pxor xmm0, xmm0 # <retval>
.loc 1 10 5 is_stmt 1 view .LVU16
.LVL7:
.L1:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:11: }
.loc 1 11 1 is_stmt 0 view .LVU17
ret
.p2align 4,,10
.p2align 3
.L10:
.loc 1 11 1 view .LVU18
ret
.LVL8:
.L8:
.LBB1546:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:7: for (long i =0 ; i < n; ++i) {
.loc 1 7 15 view .LVU19
xor eax, eax # tmp.301
.LBE1546:
# example_code/memory_bandwidth.cpp:6: double s = 0;
.loc 1 6 12 view .LVU20
pxor xmm0, xmm0 # <retval>
jmp .L3 #
.cfi_endproc
.LFE3624:
.size _Z9sum_arrayPdl, .-_Z9sum_arrayPdl
.section .text.startup,"ax",@progbits
.p2align 4
.globl main
.type main, @function
lshw -class memory
的完整输出:
*-firmware
description: BIOS
vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
physical id: 0
version: 1.90
date: 10/21/2016
size: 64KiB
capacity: 15MiB
capabilities: pci upgrade shadowing cdboot bootselect socketedrom edd int13floppy1200 int13floppy720 int13floppy2880 int5printscreen int9keyboard int14serial int17printer acpi usb biosbootspecification uefi
*-memory
description: System Memory
physical id: 3c
slot: System board or motherboard
size: 16GiB
*-bank:0
description: [empty]
physical id: 0
slot: ChannelA-DIMM0
*-bank:1
description: DIMM DDR4 Synchronous 2400 MHz (0.4 ns)
product: CMU16GX4M2A2400C16
vendor: AMI
physical id: 1
serial: 00000000
slot: ChannelA-DIMM1
size: 8GiB
width: 64 bits
clock: 2400MHz (0.4ns)
*-bank:2
description: [empty]
physical id: 2
slot: ChannelB-DIMM0
*-bank:3
description: DIMM DDR4 Synchronous 2400 MHz (0.4 ns)
product: CMU16GX4M2A2400C16
vendor: AMI
physical id: 3
serial: 00000000
slot: ChannelB-DIMM1
size: 8GiB
width: 64 bits
clock: 2400MHz (0.4ns)
与CPU相关吗?好吧,这是规格:
$ lscpu
Architecture: x86_64
CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
Byte Order: Little Endian
CPU(s): 2
On-line CPU(s) list: 0,1
Thread(s) per core: 1
Core(s) per socket: 2
Socket(s): 1
NUMA node(s): 1
Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
CPU family: 6
Model: 94
Model name: Intel(R) Pentium(R) CPU G4400 @ 3.30GHz
Stepping: 3
CPU MHz: 3168.660
CPU max MHz: 3300.0000
CPU min MHz: 800.0000
BogoMIPS: 6624.00
Virtualization: VT-x
L1d cache: 32K
L1i cache: 32K
L2 cache: 256K
L3 cache: 3072K
NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0,1
Flags: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx pdpe1gb rdtscp lm constant_tsc art arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good nopl xtopology nonstop_tsc cpuid aperfmperf tsc_known_freq pni pclmulqdq dtes64 monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 sdbg cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic movbe popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave rdrand lahf_lm abm 3dnowprefetch cpuid_fault invpcid_single pti ssbd ibrs ibpb stibp tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase tsc_adjust erms invpcid rdseed smap clflushopt intel_pt xsaveopt xsavec xgetbv1 xsaves dtherm arat pln pts hwp hwp_notify hwp_act_window hwp_epp flush_l1d
由clang编译产生的数据更易于理解。随着向量变得比缓存大得多,性能单调下降,直到达到19.8Gb / s:
这是基准输出:
答案 0 :(得分:1)
从硬件描述看来,您有两个放在两个通道中的DIMM插槽。这会在两个DIMM芯片之间插入内存,因此将从两个芯片读取内存访问。 (一种可能是DIMM1中的字节0-7和DIMM2中的字节8-15,但这取决于硬件实现。)这将使内存带宽加倍,因为您正在访问两个硬件芯片而不是一个。
某些系统支持三或四个通道,从而进一步增加了最大带宽。