pg_rewind之后PostgreSQL没有启动

时间:2019-05-02 11:11:01

标签: postgresql database-replication

我在从属服务器上使用pg_rewind的方式如下:

/usr/pgsql-11/bin/pg_rewind -D <data_dir_path> --source-server="port=5432 user=myuser host=<ip>"

命令成功完成:

source and target cluster are on the same timeline
no rewind required

之后,我在新的从站上创建了recovery.conf,如下所示:

standby_mode          = 'on'
primary_conninfo      = 'host=<master_ip> port=5432 user=<uname> password=<password> sslmode=require sslcompression=0'
trigger_file = '/tmp/MasterNow'

之后,我在从属服务器上启动PostgreSQL并检查状态。我收到以下消息:

]# systemctl status postgresql-11
● postgresql-11.service - PostgreSQL 11 database server
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/postgresql-11.service; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: activating (start) since Thu 2019-05-02 10:36:11 UTC; 33min ago
     Docs: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/11/static/
  Process: 26444 ExecStartPre=/usr/pgsql-11/bin/postgresql-11-check-db-dir ${PGDATA} (code=exited, status=0/SUCCESS)
 Main PID: 26450 (postmaster)
   CGroup: /system.slice/postgresql-11.service
           ├─26450 /usr/pgsql-11/bin/postmaster -D /var/lib/pgsql/11/data/
           └─26458 postgres: startup   recovering 000000060000000000000008

May 02 11:09:13 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:13 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:18 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:18 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:23 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:23 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:28 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:28 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:33 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:33 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:38 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:38 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:43 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:43 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:48 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:48 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:53 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:53 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
May 02 11:09:58 my.localhost postmaster[26450]: 2019-05-02 11:09:58 UTC LOG:  record length 1485139969 at 0/8005CB0 too long
Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full.

在主服务器上,pg_wal目录如下所示:

root@{/var/lib/pgsql/11/data/pg_wal}#ls -R
.:
000000010000000000000003  000000020000000000000006  000000040000000000000006  000000050000000000000008  archive_status
000000010000000000000004  00000002.history          00000004.history          00000005.history
000000020000000000000004  000000030000000000000006  000000050000000000000006  000000060000000000000008
000000020000000000000005  00000003.history          000000050000000000000007  00000006.history

./archive_status:
000000050000000000000006.done  000000050000000000000007.done

来自奴隶的PostgreSQL日志:

May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9226]: [39-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC LOG:  entering standby mode
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9226]: [40-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC LOG:  invalid resource manager ID 80 at 0/8005C78
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9226]: [41-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  switched WAL source from archive to stream after failure
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [35-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  find_in_dynamic_libpath: trying "/usr/pgsql-11/lib/libpqwalreceiver"
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [36-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  find_in_dynamic_libpath: trying "/usr/pgsql-11/lib/libpqwalreceiver.so"
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [37-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC LOG:  started streaming WAL from primary at 0/8000000 on timeline 6
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [38-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sendtime 2019-05-03 06:08:58.348488+00 receipttime 2019-05-03 06:08:58.350018+00 replication apply delay (N/A) transfer latency 1 ms
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [39-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sending write 0/8020000 flush 0/0 apply 0/0
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [40-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sending write 0/8020000 flush 0/8020000 apply 0/0
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9226]: [42-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC LOG:  invalid resource manager ID 80 at 0/8005C78
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [41-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sendtime 2019-05-03 06:08:58.349865+00 receipttime 2019-05-03 06:08:58.35253+00 replication apply delay 0 ms transfer latency 2 ms
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [42-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sending write 0/8040000 flush 0/8020000 apply 0/0
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [43-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sending write 0/8040000 flush 0/8040000 apply 0/0
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [44-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  sending write 0/8040000 flush 0/8040000 apply 0/0
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [45-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC FATAL:  terminating walreceiver process due to administrator command
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [46-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  shmem_exit(1): 1 before_shmem_exit callbacks to make
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [47-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  shmem_exit(1): 5 on_shmem_exit callbacks to make
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [48-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  proc_exit(1): 2 callbacks to make
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [49-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  exit(1)
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [50-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  shmem_exit(-1): 0 before_shmem_exit callbacks to make
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [51-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  shmem_exit(-1): 0 on_shmem_exit callbacks to make
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9227]: [52-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  proc_exit(-1): 0 callbacks to make
May  3 06:08:58  postgres[9218]: [35-1] 2019-05-03 06:08:58 UTC DEBUG:  reaping dead processes    

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:1)

我想说备用数据库正在尝试沿着错误的时间线恢复(我猜是5),没有遵循新的主数据库到最新的时间线,并且一直在WAL文件中命中无效的记录。

我将以下内容添加到recovery.conf

recovery_target_timeline = 'latest' 

要进行更详细的分析,请查看PostgreSQL日志文件。