将Masstransit与RabbitMQ一起使用时,我看到的效果令人失望。传送/获取速度降至0.20 /秒。我开始使用一个简单的测试应用程序来研究此问题。此应用程序并行运行一个线程,该线程使用RabbitMQ客户端库将消息发送到RabbitMQ,而一个线程使用Masstransit库将相同的消息发送到RabbitMQ。 RabbitMQ客户端库发送的消息比Masstransit库多10倍。
RabbitMQ在HyperV计算机的Docker容器中运行。 Masstransit的PublishConfirm标志具有一定作用,但作用不大。 为了进行公平的比较,为RabbitMQ案例定义了与Masstransit案例相同的拓扑。
公交代码:
public MasstransitMessageSender(string user, string password, string rabbitMqHost)
{
this.user = user;
this.password = password;
this.rabbitMqHost = rabbitMqHost;
}
public RabbitMqMessageSender(string user, string password, string rabbitMqHost)
{
var myUri = new Uri(rabbitMqHost);
this.factory = new ConnectionFactory
{
HostName = myUri.Host,
UserName = user,
Password = password,
VirtualHost = myUri.LocalPath,
Port = (myUri.Port > 0 ? myUri.Port : -1),
AutomaticRecoveryEnabled = true
};
}
public Task SendCommands(int numberOfMessages)
{
return Task.Run(() =>
{
var busControl = global::MassTransit.Bus.Factory.CreateUsingRabbitMq(
sbc =>
{
// Host control
var host =
sbc.Host(
new Uri(this.rabbitMqHost),
h =>
{
h.Username(this.user);
h.Password(this.password);
h.Heartbeat(60);
h.PublisherConfirmation = false;
});
});
busControl.StartAsync().Wait();
var task = busControl.GetSendEndpoint(new Uri(this.rabbitMqHost + "/MasstransitService"));
var tasks = new List<Task>();
task.Wait();
var endpoint = task.Result;
for (var i = 0; i < numberOfMessages; i++)
{
tasks.Add(endpoint.Send<IMyMessage>(new
{
Number = i,
Description = "MyMessage"
}));
}
Task.WaitAll(tasks.ToArray());
});
}
RabbitMQ代码:
public RabbitMqMessageSender(string user, string password, string rabbitMqHost)
{
var myUri = new Uri(rabbitMqHost);
this.factory = new ConnectionFactory
{
HostName = myUri.Host,
UserName = user,
Password = password,
VirtualHost = myUri.LocalPath,
Port = (myUri.Port > 0 ? myUri.Port : -1),
AutomaticRecoveryEnabled = true
};
}
public Task SendCommands(int numberOfMessages)
{
return Task.Run(() =>
{
using (var connection = this.factory.CreateConnection())
{
using (var channel = connection.CreateModel())
{
var messageProperties = channel.CreateBasicProperties();
channel.ExchangeDeclare("PerformanceConsole:ShowRabbitMqMessage", "fanout", true, false, null);
channel.ExchangeDeclare("RabbitMqService", "fanout", true, false, null);
channel.QueueDeclare("RabbitMqService", true, false, false, null);
channel.ExchangeBind("RabbitMqService", "PerformanceConsole:ShowRabbitMqMessage", "", null);
channel.QueueBind("RabbitMqService", "RabbitMqService", "", null);
for (var i = 0; i < numberOfMessages; i++)
{
var bericht = new
{
Volgnummer = 1,
Tekst = "Bericht"
};
var body = Encoding.UTF8.GetBytes(JsonConvert.SerializeObject(bericht));
channel.BasicPublish("RabbitMqService", "", messageProperties, body);
}
}
}
});
}
RabbitMQ仪表板显示以下费率:
公交输入664 msg / s RabbitMQ传入6764 msg / s
我希望传入的速率在相同范围内。
也许我在配置上犯了一个错误,欢迎提出建议。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
使用MassTransit-Benchmark,在OS X上使用netcoreapp2.2在MacBook Pro 2015上获得以下性能。
PhatBoyG-Pro15:MassTransit-Benchmark Chris$ dotnet run -f netcoreapp2.2 -- --clients=50 --count=50000 --prefetch=100
MassTransit Benchmark
Transport: RabbitMQ
Host: localhost
Virtual Host: /
Username: guest
Password: *****
Heartbeat: 0
Publisher Confirmation: False
Running Message Latency Benchmark
Message Count: 50000
Clients: 50
Durable: False
Payload Length: 0
Prefetch Count: 100
Concurrency Limit: 0
Total send duration: 0:00:05.2250045
Send message rate: 9569.37 (msg/s)
Total consume duration: 0:00:07.2385114
Consume message rate: 6907.50 (msg/s)
Concurrent Consumer Count: 8
Avg Ack Time: 4ms
Min Ack Time: 0ms
Max Ack Time: 251ms
Med Ack Time: 4ms
95t Ack Time: 6ms
Avg Consume Time: 1431ms
Min Consume Time: 268ms
Max Consume Time: 2075ms
Med Consume Time: 1639ms
95t Consume Time: 2070ms
您可以下载基准测试并自己运行: https://github.com/MassTransit/MassTransit-Benchmark