我遵循docs并实现了如下所示的内容:
function validation_altered_data()
{
var a = $('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').append("<option id='optioncount' value='365'></option>");
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(365).trigger('change');
counter_alter_validation = 0;
for(i = 1; i <=100; i++)
{
var sam = $('#timein' + i).val();
var date = new Date(sam);
month = date.getMonth()+1;
if(month < 10)
{
var month_format = "0" + (date.getMonth()+1);
}
else
{
var month_format = (date.getMonth()+1);
}
var this_date = date.getDate();
if(this_date >= 10)
{
var day_format = date.getDate();
}
else
{
var day_format = "0"+ date.getDate();
}
var res = date.getFullYear() + "-" + month_format + "-" + day_format;
if($('#checkalt' + i))
{
if($('#checkalt' + i).prop("checked") == true)
{
var date_to_alter = $('#infos' + i).val().split("]]");
counter_alter_validation++;
if($('#txtReason_apply').val() == ""){
az = "1";
checker_validation = "false";
error="Reason for Alteration is Required!";
$("select[name=table_time_records_length] option[value='365']").remove();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(a).trigger('change');
break;
}
//If time in or time out IS EMPTY
else if($('#timeout' + i).val() == "" || $('#timein' + i).val() == "")
{
az = "2";
checker_validation = "false";
error="Time In field and Time Out field is required!";
$("select[name=table_time_records_length] option[value='365']").remove();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(a).trigger('change');
break;
}
else if($('#timeout' + i).val() <= $('#timein' + i).val())
{
az = "3";
checker_validation = "false";
error="Time Out field must be greater than Time In field!";
$("select[name=table_time_records_length] option[value='365']").remove();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(a).trigger('change');
break;
}
else if(res != date_to_alter[0])
{
az = "4";
checker_validation = "false";
error="Invalid Details, Check Time in and Time out!";
$("select[name=table_time_records_length] option[value='365']").remove();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(a).trigger('change');
break;
}
//Avoid saving the current date, If the user removes disabled attribute in the inspect elements
else if(date_to_alter[0] == curDate)
{
az = "5";
checker_validation = "false";
error="You can't alter the current date!";
$("select[name=table_time_records_length] option[value='365']").remove();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(a).trigger('change');
break;
}
else if($('#validateStatus' + i).val() == "Punch Altered")
{
az = "6";
checker_validation = "false";
error = "You can't edit altered rows!";
$("select[name=table_time_records_length] option[value='365']").remove();
$('select[name=table_time_records_length]').val(a).trigger('change');
break;
}
else
{
checker_validation = "true";
}
}
}
}
}
但是,只有一个目标通过,我认为没有确定性的过程来确定哪个目标被构建(也就是说,有时是Web目标被构建,而其他时候是节点目标)。
我不确定在上面的配置中我做错了什么,但是我觉得在某些竞速条件下,一个目标要先于另一个而先建立,因此节点进程在建立两个目标之前就退出了。是这样吗这是我的common config。
我使用的webpack版本是...
const config = {
mode: 'development',
devtool: 'inline-source-map',
};
const nodeConfig = merge(common, {
...config,
output: {
filename: 'bundle.node.js',
},
target: 'node',
});
const webConfig = merge(common, {
...config,
node: {
crypto: true,
},
output: {
filename: 'bundle.web.js',
},
target: 'web',
});
module.exports = [nodeConfig, webConfig];
。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
我整理了一下。在我的常用配置中,我使用的是clean-webpack-plugin:
plugins: [
new CleanWebpackPlugin(),
...
]
很明显,在构建第二个目标时,干净的插件正在擦除第一个目标。
特别是如果您是从CI部署的,则实际上并不需要此插件。