我们正在编写的查询中遇到一个特定的问题。 这是示例:
Doc. ID | Timestamp | Employee
01 | 01 | A
01 | 02 | B
01 | 03 | B
01 | 04 | C
01 | 05 | A
01 | 06 | A
我们想要实现的是:
Doc. ID | Timestamp | Employee
01 | 01 | A
01 | 03 | B
01 | 04 | C
01 | 06 | A
这是我们的方法(无效):
SELECT [Doc. ID], [Timestamp], [Employee]
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY [Doc. ID],[Employee] order by [Employee] desc) as "RN"
FROM XY
WHERE "RN" = 1
但是不幸的是,这行不通,因为当再次在底部找到A时,Row_number不会重置。我们收到的结果(没有where子句)是:
Doc. ID | Timestamp | Employee | RN
01 | 01 | A | 1
01 | 02 | B | 1
01 | 03 | B | 2
01 | 04 | C | 1
01 | 05 | A | 2
01 | 06 | A | 3
我认为仅是实现正确解决方案而已。.:)
答案 0 :(得分:4)
使用lead()
达到“下一个”行中员工价值的峰值:
select xy.*
from (select xy.*,
lead(employee) over (partition by docid order by timestamp) as next_employee
from xy
) xy
where next_employee is null or next_employee <> employee;
答案 1 :(得分:2)
我认为您想要聚合:
SELECT [doc. ID], MAX([Timestamp]) AS [Timestamp], employee
FROM (SELECT t.*,
row_number() over (order by [Timestamp]) as seq1,
row_number() over (partition by [doc. ID], employee order by [Timestamp]) as seq2
FROM XY t
) t
GROUP BY [doc. ID], employee, (seq1 - seq2)
ORDER BY [Timestamp];