Feed操作员管道的行为

时间:2019-03-15 08:08:21

标签: perl6

我正在使用以下代码尝试供稿运算符:

my $limit=10000000;
my $list=(0,1...4);
sub task($_,$name) {
    say "Start $name on $*THREAD";
    loop ( my $i=0; $i < $limit; $i++ ){};
    say "End $name";
    Nil;
}

sub stage( &code, *@elements --> Seq) {
    map(&code,  @elements);
}

sub feeds() {
    my @results;
    $list
    ==> map ({ task($_, "stage 1"); say( now - ENTER now );$_+1})
    ==> map ({ task($_, "stage 2"); say( now - ENTER now );$_+1})
    ==> stage ({ task($_, "stage 3"); say( now - ENTER now );$_+1}) 
    ==> @results;

    say @results;
}

feeds();
  • 任务子只是一个循环,用于刻录cpu周期并显示所使用的线程
  • stage子是地图子的包装器
  • 提要管道的每个步骤都映射到调用CPU密集型任务并对其进行计时。地图的结果是输入+1

运行时的输出为:

Start stage 1 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 1
0.7286811
Start stage 2 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 2
0.59053989
Start stage 1 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 1
0.5955893
Start stage 2 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 2
0.59050998
Start stage 1 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 1
0.59472201
Start stage 2 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 2
0.5968531
Start stage 1 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 1
0.5917188
Start stage 2 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 2
0.587358
Start stage 1 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 1
0.58689858
Start stage 2 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 2
0.59177099
Start stage 3 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 3
3.8549498
Start stage 3 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 3
3.8560015
Start stage 3 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 3
3.77634317
Start stage 3 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 3
3.6754558
Start stage 3 on Thread<1>(Initial thread)
End stage 3
3.672909
[3 4 5 6 7]

@result中的结果正确(来自$list的输入以3递增3)

前两个阶段的输出拉/交替,但是直到完成第2阶段的所有输入后,第三阶段才会执行

我的map子包装器出现问题了吗?

与直接调用map相比,在包装器中评估所需的时间也明显更长。

感谢您的帮助。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:6)

slurpy参数正在等待消耗传递给它的整个序列。考虑以下两者之间的区别:

perl6 -e 'sub foo($) { }; my $items := gather for 1..Inf { say $_ }; foo($items);'
perl6 -e 'sub foo(*@) { }; my $items := gather for 1..Inf { say $_ }; foo($items);'

第一个示例将结束,第二个示例将永远结束。因此,您需要将舞台功能更改为:

sub stage( &code, $elements --> Seq) {
    map(&code,  $elements);
}