我有这张桌子:
id | datetime | row_number
1 2018-04-09 06:27:00 1
1 2018-04-09 14:15:00 2
1 2018-04-09 15:25:00 3
1 2018-04-09 15:35:00 4
1 2018-04-09 15:51:00 5
1 2018-04-09 17:05:00 6
1 2018-04-10 06:42:00 7
1 2018-04-10 16:39:00 8
1 2018-04-10 18:58:00 9
1 2018-04-10 19:41:00 10
1 2018-04-14 17:05:00 11
1 2018-04-14 17:48:00 12
1 2018-04-14 18:57:00 13
我将为每一行计算时间<= '01:30:00'的连续行,并从不满足条件的第一行开始进行连续评估。
我试图更好地说明这个问题。 使用Windows函数lag():
SELECT id, datetime,
CASE WHEN datetime - lag (datetime,1) OVER(PARTITION BY id ORDER BY datetime)
< '01:30:00' THEN 1 ELSE 0 END AS count
FROM table
结果是:
id | datetime | count
1 2018-04-09 06:27:00 0
1 2018-04-09 14:15:00 0
1 2018-04-09 15:25:00 1
1 2018-04-09 15:35:00 1
1 2018-04-09 15:51:00 1
1 2018-04-09 17:05:00 1
1 2018-04-10 06:42:00 0
1 2018-04-10 16:39:00 0
1 2018-04-10 18:58:00 0
1 2018-04-10 19:41:00 1
1 2018-04-14 17:05:00 0
1 2018-04-14 17:48:00 1
1 2018-04-14 18:57:00 1
但是对我来说,这不是一件好事,因为我要排除row_number 5,因为row_number 5和row_number 2之间的间隔为'01:30:00'。并从row_number 5开始新的评估。 row_number 13相同。
正确的输出可能是:
id | datetime | count
1 2018-04-09 06:27:00 0
1 2018-04-09 14:15:00 0
1 2018-04-09 15:25:00 1
1 2018-04-09 15:35:00 1
1 2018-04-09 15:51:00 0
1 2018-04-09 17:05:00 1
1 2018-04-10 06:42:00 0
1 2018-04-10 16:39:00 0
1 2018-04-10 18:58:00 0
1 2018-04-10 19:41:00 1
1 2018-04-14 17:05:00 0
1 2018-04-14 17:48:00 1
1 2018-04-14 18:57:00 0
所以正确的计数是5。
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我将为此使用递归查询:
WITH RECURSIVE tmp AS (
SELECT
id,
datetime,
row_number,
0 AS counting,
datetime AS last_start
FROM mytable
WHERE row_number = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT
t1.id,
t1.datetime,
t1.row_number,
CASE
WHEN lateral_1.counting THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS counting,
CASE
WHEN lateral_1.counting THEN tmp.last_start
ELSE t1.datetime
END AS last_start
FROM
mytable AS t1
INNER JOIN
tmp ON (t1.id = tmp.id AND t1.row_number - 1 = tmp.row_number),
LATERAL (SELECT (t1.datetime - tmp.last_start) < '1h 30m'::interval AS counting) AS lateral_1
)
SELECT id, datetime, counting
FROM tmp
ORDER BY id, datetime;