Question

测试包含transferFrom的函数时，我的代码正在还原。还原被隔离到此行，注释掉后，它运行正常。

到目前为止，我的（错误）假设是：

是否发布批准令牌（错误的from地址或错误的Loan合同地址？）
将错误的this.Token.address传递给createLoan

关于还有什么其他问题的任何想法？

这是我的合同Loan.sol

pragma solidity ^0.5.0;

import "openzeppelin-solidity/contracts/math/SafeMath.sol";
import "openzeppelin-solidity/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";
import "openzeppelin-solidity/contracts/ownership/Ownable.sol";
import "./DSmath.sol";

contract Loan is Ownable, DSMath {

...
function createLoan
    (
        uint _loanAmount,
        uint _collateralAmount,
        address _collateralAddress
    ) 
    external {
        require(loaneeToDebt[msg.sender] == 0, "User already owes tokens");
        require
        (
            isCollateralized(_loanAmount, _collateralAmount, _collateralAddress),
            "Collateral posted is insufficient to receive a loan"
        );
        require(tokenPrices[_collateralAddress] != 0, "Collateral token not registered to system");     

        ERC20(_collateralAddress).transferFrom(msg.sender, address(this), _collateralAmount); //REVERTS HERE

        loaneeToDebt[msg.sender] = _collateralAmount;

    }

我正在Loan.test.js中进行这样的测试：

// Loan.test.js
const {BN, expectEvent, shouldFail, constants} = require("openzeppelin-test-helpers");
const Loan = artifacts.require("Loan");
const ERC20Mock = artifacts.require("ERC20Mock")

contract("Loan", function ([_, contractOwner, user]) {

    const initialSupply = new BN(1).mul(new BN(10).pow(new BN(28)))
    beforeEach(async function () {
        this.Loan = await Loan.new({from: contractOwner});
        this.Token = await ERC20Mock.new(user, initialSupply)
    });

    describe("#createLoan", function () {
        const collateralAmount = new BN(5).mul(new BN(10).pow(new BN(27)))
        const loanAmount = new BN(1).mul(new BN(10).pow(new BN(24)))
        const tokenPrice = new BN(1)
        beforeEach(async function () {
            await this.Loan.setTokenPrice(this.Token.address, tokenPrice, {from: contractOwner});
        });

        it("should revert if the user has an outstanding loan", async function () {
            await this.Token.approve(this.Loan.address, collateralAmount, {from: user}); // APPROVAL
            await this.Loan.createLoan(loanAmount, collateralAmount, this.Token.address, {from: user}) // REVERTS HERE
            shouldFail.reverting(this.Loan.createLoan(loanAmount, collateralAmount, this.Token.address, {from: user});
        });
    });
});

使用ERC20Mock：

pragma solidity ^0.5.0;
import "openzeppelin-solidity/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol";

contract ERC20Mock is ERC20 {
    constructor (address initialAccount, uint256 initialBalance) public {
        _mint(initialAccount, initialBalance);
    }

    function mint(address account, uint256 amount) public {
        _mint(account, amount);
    }

    function burn(address account, uint256 amount) public {
        _burn(account, amount);
    }

    function burnFrom(address account, uint256 amount) public {
        _burnFrom(account, amount);
    }
}

Answer 1

要能够执行transferFrom，需要先批准用户。

  function approve(address spender, uint256 value) external returns (bool);

在您的情况下，消息发件人应批准与_collateralAmount相同金额的贷款合同。

您还可以使用以下功能检查一个人的津贴额：

  function allowance(address owner, address spender) external view returns (uint256);

值得在createLoan（）的开头提出一项要求，以检查配额是否足够。

在ERC20.transferFrom上还原

1 个答案: