Keras CNN培训来识别验证码：损失少且准确性低

Question

我想训练一个可以识别出这种验证码的模型

我想识别图片中的每个单词

所以我在下面创建cnn模型

首先，我有一个这样的模型：

print("Creating CNN model...")
a = Input((40, 80, 3))
out = a
out = Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
#out = Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
#out = Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = Conv2D(filters=128, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
#out = Conv2D(filters=128, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out) 
out = Conv2D(filters=256, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2) , dim_ordering="th")(out)
out = Flatten()(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = Dense(512, activation='relu')(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = [Dense(36, name='digit1', activation='softmax')(out),\
       Dense(36, name='digit2', activation='softmax')(out),\
       Dense(36, name='digit3', activation='softmax')(out),\
       Dense(36, name='digit4', activation='softmax')(out)]

model = Model(inputs=a, outputs=out)
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy'])
model.summary()

当我训练模型时 我认为它具有很高的损失，但对有效集合的准确性并不是很差

像这样：

Epoch 47/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 2s 2ms/step - loss: 0.9421 - digit1_loss: 0.2456 - digit2_loss: 0.2657 - digit3_loss: 0.2316 - digit4_loss: 0.1992 - digit1_acc: 0.9400 - digit2_acc: 0.9190 - digit3_acc: 0.9330 - digit4_acc: 0.9300 - val_loss: 5.0476 - val_digit1_loss: 0.5545 - val_digit2_loss: 1.8687 - val_digit3_loss: 1.8951 - val_digit4_loss: 0.7294 - val_digit1_acc: 0.8300 - val_digit2_acc: 0.5500 - val_digit3_acc: 0.5200 - val_digit4_acc: 0.8000

Epoch 00047: val_digit4_acc did not improve from 0.83000
Epoch 48/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 2s 2ms/step - loss: 0.9154 - digit1_loss: 0.1681 - digit2_loss: 0.2992 - digit3_loss: 0.2556 - digit4_loss: 0.1924 - digit1_acc: 0.9520 - digit2_acc: 0.9180 - digit3_acc: 0.9220 - digit4_acc: 0.9370 - val_loss: 4.6983 - val_digit1_loss: 0.4929 - val_digit2_loss: 1.8220 - val_digit3_loss: 1.6665 - val_digit4_loss: 0.7170 - val_digit1_acc: 0.8700 - val_digit2_acc: 0.5300 - val_digit3_acc: 0.5900 - val_digit4_acc: 0.8300

Epoch 00048: val_digit4_acc improved from 0.83000 to 0.83000, saving model to cnn_model.hdf5
Epoch 49/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 2s 2ms/step - loss: 0.8703 - digit1_loss: 0.1813 - digit2_loss: 0.2374 - digit3_loss: 0.2537 - digit4_loss: 0.1979 - digit1_acc: 0.9450 - digit2_acc: 0.9240 - digit3_acc: 0.9250 - digit4_acc: 0.9400 - val_loss: 4.6405 - val_digit1_loss: 0.4936 - val_digit2_loss: 1.8665 - val_digit3_loss: 1.5744 - val_digit4_loss: 0.7060 - val_digit1_acc: 0.8700 - val_digit2_acc: 0.5000 - val_digit3_acc: 0.5900 - val_digit4_acc: 0.7800

Epoch 00049: val_digit4_acc did not improve from 0.83000
Epoch 50/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 2s 2ms/step - loss: 0.9112 - digit1_loss: 0.2036 - digit2_loss: 0.2543 - digit3_loss: 0.2222 - digit4_loss: 0.2312 - digit1_acc: 0.9360 - digit2_acc: 0.9170 - digit3_acc: 0.9290 - digit4_acc: 0.9330 - val_loss: 4.9354 - val_digit1_loss: 0.5632 - val_digit2_loss: 1.8869 - val_digit3_loss: 1.7899 - val_digit4_loss: 0.6954 - val_digit1_acc: 0.8600 - val_digit2_acc: 0.5000 - val_digit3_acc: 0.5700 - val_digit4_acc: 0.7900

然后我使用model.evaluate有效集合，得到这样的损失和准确性：

（损耗高，精度也高）

Test loss: 4.9354219818115235
Test accuracy: 0.5632282853126526

第二次，我像这样更改模型：（取出2个隐藏层）

# Create CNN Model
print("Creating CNN model...")
a = Input((40, 80, 3))
out = a
out = Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
#out = Conv2D(filters=32, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
#out = Conv2D(filters=64, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = Conv2D(filters=128, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
#out = Conv2D(filters=128, kernel_size=(3, 3), activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2))(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out) 
out = Conv2D(filters=256, kernel_size=(3, 3), padding='same', activation='relu')(out)
out = BatchNormalization()(out)
out = MaxPooling2D(pool_size=(2, 2) , dim_ordering="th")(out)
out = Flatten()(out)
out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
#out = Dense(1024, activation='relu')(out)
#out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
#out = Dense(512, activation='relu')(out)
#out = Dropout(0.3)(out)
out = [Dense(36, name='digit1', activation='softmax')(out),\
       Dense(36, name='digit2', activation='softmax')(out),\
       Dense(36, name='digit3', activation='softmax')(out),\
       Dense(36, name='digit4', activation='softmax')(out)]

model = Model(inputs=a, outputs=out)
model.compile(loss='categorical_crossentropy', optimizer='adam', metrics=['accuracy']) 
model.summary()

当我训练模型时 我认为它的损失小，有效集准确度高

像这样：

Epoch 47/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 1s 1ms/step - loss: 0.0536 - digit1_loss: 0.0023 - digit2_loss: 0.0231 - digit3_loss: 0.0230 - digit4_loss: 0.0052 - digit1_acc: 1.0000 - digit2_acc: 0.9980 - digit3_acc: 0.9990 - digit4_acc: 0.9990 - val_loss: 1.2679 - val_digit1_loss: 0.1059 - val_digit2_loss: 0.6560 - val_digit3_loss: 0.4402 - val_digit4_loss: 0.0658 - val_digit1_acc: 0.9600 - val_digit2_acc: 0.8200 - val_digit3_acc: 0.8900 - val_digit4_acc: 0.9900

Epoch 00047: val_digit4_acc did not improve from 0.99000
Epoch 48/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 1s 1ms/step - loss: 0.0686 - digit1_loss: 0.0044 - digit2_loss: 0.0269 - digit3_loss: 0.0238 - digit4_loss: 0.0136 - digit1_acc: 0.9990 - digit2_acc: 0.9980 - digit3_acc: 0.9980 - digit4_acc: 0.9950 - val_loss: 1.2249 - val_digit1_loss: 0.1170 - val_digit2_loss: 0.6593 - val_digit3_loss: 0.4152 - val_digit4_loss: 0.0334 - val_digit1_acc: 0.9500 - val_digit2_acc: 0.8200 - val_digit3_acc: 0.8800 - val_digit4_acc: 0.9900

Epoch 00048: val_digit4_acc did not improve from 0.99000
Epoch 49/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 1s 1ms/step - loss: 0.0736 - digit1_loss: 0.0087 - digit2_loss: 0.0309 - digit3_loss: 0.0268 - digit4_loss: 0.0071 - digit1_acc: 0.9980 - digit2_acc: 0.9940 - digit3_acc: 0.9950 - digit4_acc: 0.9970 - val_loss: 1.3238 - val_digit1_loss: 0.1229 - val_digit2_loss: 0.6496 - val_digit3_loss: 0.4951 - val_digit4_loss: 0.0562 - val_digit1_acc: 0.9500 - val_digit2_acc: 0.8400 - val_digit3_acc: 0.8500 - val_digit4_acc: 0.9900

Epoch 00049: val_digit4_acc did not improve from 0.99000
Epoch 50/50
1000/1000 [==============================] - 1s 1ms/step - loss: 0.0935 - digit1_loss: 0.0050 - digit2_loss: 0.0354 - digit3_loss: 0.0499 - digit4_loss: 0.0032 - digit1_acc: 0.9980 - digit2_acc: 0.9910 - digit3_acc: 0.9890 - digit4_acc: 0.9990 - val_loss: 1.7740 - val_digit1_loss: 0.1539 - val_digit2_loss: 0.9237 - val_digit3_loss: 0.6273 - val_digit4_loss: 0.0690 - val_digit1_acc: 0.9300 - val_digit2_acc: 0.7900 - val_digit3_acc: 0.8400 - val_digit4_acc: 0.9900

但是当我使用model.evaluate有效集合时，我得到了这样的损失和准确性：

（更低的损失和更低的准确性）

Test loss: 1.773969256877899
Test accuracy: 0.1539082833379507

为什么损失越来越少，我却无法获得更高的准确度？ 还是我使用“评估”方法时出现问题？

Answer 1

我将专注于训练数据。对我来说，模型似乎训练过度。第二种可能的选择是训练，交叉验证和测试集问题。

请检查： 他们真的独立吗？特别是训练和交叉验证集。
您的台数是多少？交叉验证中是否有足够的差异。