Question

我有以下Fortran代码

  type t_octree
     integer                        :: max_num_point
     class(t_octree_node), pointer  :: root => null()
     contains
     final                         :: DESTROY_OCTREE
  end type t_octree

  type t_octree_node
     real                          :: box(2,3)
     integer                       :: depth
     type(t_octree_node), pointer  :: parent      => null()
     type(t_octree_node), pointer  :: children(:) => null()
     class(t_octree_leaf), pointer :: leaf        => null()
  contains
     final                         :: CLEAN_NODE
  end type t_octree_node
  type, extends(t_octree_node) :: t_octree_leaf
     integer, allocatable          :: id(:)
     integer                       :: num_point
  contains
     final                          :: DESTROY_LEAF
  end type

在完成处理后，现在需要确保正确地释放了我的东西。

在我的最终程序中，

  subroutine DESTROY_OCTREE( this )

  implicit none

  type(t_octree)               :: this
  type(t_octree_node), pointer :: node => null()
  integer                      :: i


  node => this% root
  if( associated(node% leaf) )deallocate( node% leaf )

  if(.not. associated(node% children) )RETURN
  deallocate(  node )
  node => this% root
  i = 0
  nullify(node)
  print*, associated(this% root) ! this is true!! 
  print*, associated(this% root% children) ! this is true!! 



  end subroutine DESTROY_OCTREE

  recursive subroutine CLEAN_NODE ( this )

  implicit none

  type(t_octree_node)           :: this
  type(t_octree_node), pointer  :: node => null(), next => null()
  integer                       :: i

  if( associated(this% leaf) )then
     deallocate( this% leaf )
     nullify( this% leaf )
  endif
  if(.not. associated(this% children) )RETURN
  do i = 1, 8
     node => this% children(i)
     deallocate( node )
     nullify(node)
    ! debug
    ! print*, i, "rec"
  enddo
   nullify(this% children)
   nullify(this% parent)

  end subroutine CLEAN_NODE

  subroutine DESTROY_LEAF ( leaf )

  implicit none

  type(t_octree_leaf)        :: leaf

  deallocate( leaf% id )

  end subroutine DESTROY_LEAF

在我的主程序中，我确实关注

  program TEST_OCTREE
  use MD_OCTREE

  implicit none

  type(t_octree), pointer               :: octree

  octree      => t_octree( max_num_point,  box )
  (...) ! all processing to build the data structure

现在我可以简单地通过

解除分配

  deallocate( octree )  
  print*, associated(octree% root) ! this give a segmentation fault

问题有人可以解释为什么我的print*, associated(this% root)命令仍然显示TRUE的原因，而在我的主程序中打印时，它似乎已经被释放了，因为它给了我分段错误

Answer 1

取消分配指针会导致与同一目标关联的任何其他指针的指针关联状态变为未定义（F2018 9.7.3.3p2）。这种情况发生在node过程中的this%root和DESTROY_OCTREE中-两个指针都引用同一个对象（通过指针分配node => this% root，该对象通过{{1 }}指针-使node具有未定义的关联状态。

ASSOCIATED内部函数的参数不得为具有未定义关联状态的指针（F2018 16.9.16p3）。该代码不符合要求，可能会发生任何事情-“任何事情”都可以合理地包含您看到的结果。

通过this%root指针释放对象时，没有简单的方法可以使处理器可靠地更新node指针的状态-它最终指向不再存在的对象

所示的源代码片段中还有其他可疑的构造，包括在同一指针对象上执行DEALLOCATE语句后使用多余的NULLIFY（成功的释放会取消关联（使指针无效）），在可能合适的DEALLOCATE时使用nullify（没有完整的代码很难说），并使用似乎是结构构造函数的指针目标。

在Fortran

1 个答案: