虽然我正在使用python的socket
库测试一些基本的HCI命令,但为了使用AF_BLUETOOTH
和BTPROTO_HCI
获得任何套接字流量,似乎需要“全部通过”过滤器在套接字选项中设置:
from socket import socket, AF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_RAW, BTPROTO_HCI, SOL_HCI, HCI_FILTER
from struct import pack
PASS_ALL = pack("IIIh2x", 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0xffffffff, 0)
def open_socket_with_hci(dev_id: int):
hci = socket(AF_BLUETOOTH, SOCK_RAW, BTPROTO_HCI)
hci.bind((dev_id,))
hci.setsockopt(SOL_HCI, HCI_FILTER, PASS_ALL)
return hci
我发现hci_filter结构定义为:
struct hci_filter {
uint32_t type_mask;
uint32_t event_mask[2];
uint16_t opcode;
};
操作码掩码足够直接。我假设type_mask
是值的掩码(来自hci.h的代码):
/* HCI data types */
#define HCI_COMMAND_PKT 0x01
#define HCI_ACLDATA_PKT 0x02
#define HCI_SCODATA_PKT 0x03
#define HCI_EVENT_PKT 0x04
#define HCI_DIAG_PKT 0xf0
#define HCI_VENDOR_PKT 0xff
但是有人可以解释2个event_mask
吗? HCI事件类型是第一个,子事件类型是2个(即LE元事件)吗?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
Hci.prototype.setSocketFilter = function() {
var filter = new Buffer(14);
var typeMask = (1 << HCI_COMMAND_PKT) | (1 << HCI_EVENT_PKT) | (1 << HCI_ACLDATA_PKT);
var eventMask1 = (1 << EVT_DISCONN_COMPLETE) | (1 << EVT_ENCRYPT_CHANGE) | (1 << EVT_CMD_COMPLETE) | (1 << EVT_CMD_STATUS);
var eventMask2 = (1 << (EVT_LE_META_EVENT - 32));
var opcode = 0;
filter.writeUInt32LE(typeMask, 0);
filter.writeUInt32LE(eventMask1, 4);
filter.writeUInt32LE(eventMask2, 8);
filter.writeUInt16LE(opcode, 12);
debug('setting filter to: ' + filter.toString('hex'));
this._socket.setFilter(filter);
};
因此,将掩码定义为由蓝牙核心第2卷第E部分第5和7节中定义的常数值左移的位。