我正在开发一个向多个API发送多个请求的控制台应用程序，并且正在使用异步，任务和等待。我使用秒表来显示每个请求/任务所花费的时间，我注意到它开始时很短（150毫秒），而每个下一个任务大约增加了100毫秒。 我认为任务正在同时运行，因为该程序在8秒钟内完成了83个请求/任务，而当我用Chrome测量get请求时，它显示了大约200ms。
您知道为什么时间随着任务的进行而增加吗？测量或我的代码逻辑有问题吗？ 这不是应该更快吗？根据我的说法， WhenAll 应该同时运行任务，并且总体完成时间是列表中的最大任务时间。
public async Task<List<CatalogEvent>> GetEventsAsync(int id)
{
sw.Restart();
var request = GetRequest(msCatalogEndpoint);
request.AddParameter("id", id, ParameterType.UrlSegment);
List<CatalogEvent> events = new List<CatalogEvent>();
var response = await client.ExecuteTaskAsync(request).ConfigureAwait(false);
var catalog = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<CatalogEndpoint>(response.Content);
if (!(catalog.catalogEvents is null))
{
foreach (var ev in catalog.catalogEvents)
{
CatalogEvent catalogEvent = ev.Value;
catalogEvent.eventName = ev.Key.ToString();
catalogEvent.titleId = id;
DateTime dateTime = DateTime.UtcNow;
catalogEvent.date = dateTime.ToString();
events.Add(catalogEvent);
}
}
Console.WriteLine($"Task for Id: {id} took {sw.ElapsedMilliseconds} ms and was managed by Thread: {Thread.CurrentThread.ManagedThreadId}");
return events;
}
我正在使用RestSharp软件包发出请求。 主要方法是这样的：
static void Main(string[] args)
{
//this list has 83 ids which I am getting from a database
List<int> ids = GetIds();
async Task ProcessEvents()
{
IEnumerable<Task<List<CatalogEvent>>> techBriefEvents = ids.Select(id => GetEventsAsync(id));
await Task.WhenAll(techBriefEvents);
}
Task.WhenAll(ProcessEvents());
Console.ReadKey();
}
这是输出：
Task for TitleId: 142 took 164 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 16 took 349 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 10 took 634 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 215 took 650 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 114 took 826 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 214 took 843 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 56 took 983 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 212 took 1001 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 168 took 1141 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 21 took 1168 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 26 took 1309 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 30 took 1334 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 213 took 1462 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 24 took 1510 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 29 took 1619 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 23 took 1669 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 31 took 1779 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 14 took 1906 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 18 took 1943 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 20 took 2064 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 19 took 2110 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 175 took 2222 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 15 took 2275 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 102 took 2400 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 33 took 2464 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 135 took 2563 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 5 took 2632 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 137 took 2750 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 12 took 2796 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 41 took 2911 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 136 took 2998 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 43 took 3084 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 139 took 3159 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 51 took 3240 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 42 took 3322 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 39 took 3393 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 44 took 3502 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 122 took 3583 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 36 took 3697 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 95 took 3744 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 67 took 3871 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 229 took 3896 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 226 took 4034 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 108 took 4078 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 123 took 4213 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 143 took 4285 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 236 took 4364 ms and was managed by Thread: 8
Task for TitleId: 228 took 4466 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 232 took 4540 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 230 took 4641 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 149 took 4715 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 176 took 4793 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 208 took 4902 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 155 took 4946 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 61 took 5057 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 190 took 5097 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 93 took 5262 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 194 took 5280 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 156 took 5419 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 101 took 5440 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 193 took 5572 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 167 took 5598 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 197 took 5730 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 111 took 5755 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 216 took 5882 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 60 took 5930 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 9 took 6059 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 152 took 6085 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 169 took 6218 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 154 took 6264 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 7 took 6403 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 141 took 6506 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 58 took 6560 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 172 took 6670 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 11 took 6730 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 17 took 6846 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 55 took 6912 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 166 took 7020 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 140 took 7069 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 110 took 7177 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 90 took 7222 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 160 took 7352 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 97 took 7400 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 200 took 7503 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 153 took 7556 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 207 took 7654 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 161 took 7721 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 231 took 7810 ms and was managed by Thread: 5
Task for TitleId: 202 took 7873 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
Task for TitleId: 220 took 8068 ms and was managed by Thread: 6
答案 0 :(得分：0)
一个明显的误解是“并且由Thread：管理”。除非ExecuteTaskAsync实施得很差，否则there is no thread。
如果将请求发送到同一主机，则可能会遇到service point manager个限制。