我正在为远程存储设计模型,最终得到:
sealed trait StorageTag
case object Gcs extends StorageTag
case object S3 extends StorageTag
sealed trait StorageFile[T <: StorageTag]
final case class GcsFile(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[Gcs.type]
final case class S3File(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[S3.type]
sealed trait StorageConfig[T <: StorageTag]
final case class GcsConfig(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[Gcs.type]
final case class S3Config(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[S3.type]
def open[T <: StorageTag](storageFile: StorageFile[T], storageConfig: StorageConfig[T]): OutputStream =
(storageFile, storageConfig) match {
case (f: S3File, c: S3Config) => //
case (f: GcsFile, c: GcsConfig) => //
}
但是Scala编译器抱怨以下警告:
Warning:(39, 5) match may not be exhaustive.
It would fail on the following inputs: (GcsFile(_, _), S3Config(_)), (S3File(_, _), GcsConfig(_))
(storageFile, storageConfig) match {
但是在我的特定情况下,用S3File
打开GcsConfig
显然是胡说八道,反之亦然。有没有办法增强模型?
我个人不喜欢在诸如MatchError
和GcsFile
这样的不真实情况下抛出异常或将其保留为S3Config
的想法。
答案 0 :(得分:8)
您需要向编译器提供一些有关允许哪些对的信息。通过将成对的storageFile: StorageFile[T], storageConfig: StorageConfig[T]
传递给open
方法,您总是面临有人以错误的par调用open
方法的风险,您将不得不处理特殊情况。为了使它以类型安全的方式工作,您需要传递预定义的类型,以“知道”允许哪些对。
例如这样的例子:
sealed trait StorageTag
case object Gcs extends StorageTag
case object S3 extends StorageTag
sealed trait StorageFile[T <: StorageTag]
final case class GcsFile(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[Gcs.type]
final case class S3File(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[S3.type]
sealed trait StorageConfig[T <: StorageTag]
final case class GcsConfig(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[Gcs.type]
final case class S3Config(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[S3.type]
sealed trait FileConfPair
case class S3Conf(f: S3File, c: S3Config) extends FileConfPair
case class ScsConf(f: GcsFile, c: GcsConfig) extends FileConfPair
def open[T <: StorageTag](fp: FileConfPair): OutputStream =
fp match {
case S3Conf(f: S3File, c: S3Config) => ???
case ScsConf(f: GcsFile, c: GcsConfig) => ???
}
答案 1 :(得分:2)
Scala编译器抱怨,这是正确的,您没有涵盖所有可能性。我认为您有2个选择。
1基于通用类型的模式匹配(如本问题:Pattern matching on generic type in Scala)
def open[T <: StorageTag](storageFile: StorageFile[T], storageConfig: StorageConfig[T]): OutputStream =
(storageFile, storageConfig) match {
case x if typeOf[T] <:< typeOf[Gcs] => //
case x if typeOf[T] <:< typeOf[S3] => //
}
2最简单的方法是将逻辑提取到2个服务类作为点@Bogdan Vakulenko
答案 2 :(得分:2)
我想提出解决这个问题的另一种方法。
对于我对模型的了解,您真正需要的是确定必须执行正确的open
logic 的远程存储。
因此,您可以提供隐性证据,例如:
sealed trait StorageTag extends Product with Serializable
implicit case object Gcs extends StorageTag
implicit case object S3 extends StorageTag
sealed trait StorageFile[T <: StorageTag] extends Product with Serializable {
def bucket: String
def path: String
}
final case class GcsFile(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[Gcs.type]
final case class S3File(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[S3.type]
sealed trait StorageConfig[T <: StorageTag] extends Product with Serializable {
def keyPath: String
}
final case class GcsConfig(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[Gcs.type]
final case class S3Config(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[S3.type]
def open[T <: StorageTag](storageFile: StorageFile[T], storageConfig: StorageConfig[T])
(implicit tag: T):String = tag match {
case S3 =>
s"S3 -> bucket: '${storageFile.bucket}', path: '${storageFile.path}' | config keyPath: '${storageConfig.keyPath}'"
case Gcs =>
s"Gcs -> bucket: '${storageFile.bucket}', path: '${storageFile.path}' | config keyPath: '${storageConfig.keyPath}'"
}
现在,您可以通过这种方式调用方法
open(S3File(bucket = "bucket", path = "path"), S3Config(keyPath = "keyPath"))
// res0: String = "S3 -> bucket: 'bucket', path: 'path' | config keyPath: 'keyPath'"
open(GcsFile(bucket = "bucket", path = "path"), GcsConfig(keyPath = "keyPath"))
// res1: String = "Gcs -> bucket: 'bucket', path: 'path' | config keyPath: 'keyPath'"
open(S3File(bucket = "bucket", path = "path"), GcsConfig(keyPath = "keyPath"))
// Compile time error!
请注意,只有所有StorageFiles
和StorageConfigs
都具有相同的属性时,此方法才有效。
如果不是这种情况,您可以尝试以下操作:
但是请注意,此代码不是完全类型安全的,可能会被欺骗
sealed trait StorageTag extends Product with Serializable
implicit case object Gcs extends StorageTag
implicit case object S3 extends StorageTag
sealed trait StorageFile[T <: StorageTag] extends Product with Serializable
final case class GcsFile(bucket: String, path: String, id: Int) extends StorageFile[Gcs.type]
final case class S3File(bucket: String, path: String) extends StorageFile[S3.type]
sealed trait StorageConfig[T <: StorageTag] extends Product with Serializable
final case class GcsConfig(keyPath: String, name: String) extends StorageConfig[Gcs.type]
final case class S3Config(keyPath: String) extends StorageConfig[S3.type]
def open[T <: StorageTag](storageFile: StorageFile[T], storageConfig: StorageConfig[T])
(implicit tag: T): String = tag match {
case S3 =>
// These lines are not checked in compile-time, you can put GcsFile instead, and it will compile and fail at run-time!!!
val S3File(bucket, path) = storageFile
val S3Config(keyPath) = storageConfig
s"S3 -> bucket: '${bucket}', path: '${path}' | config keyPath: '${keyPath}'"
case Gcs =>
val GcsFile(bucket, path, id) = storageFile
val GcsConfig(keyPath, name) = storageConfig
s"Gcs -> bucket: '${bucket}', path: '${path}', id: $id | config keyPath: '${keyPath}', name: 'name'"
}
open(S3File(bucket = "bucket", path = "path"), S3Config(keyPath = "keyPath"))
// res0: String = "S3 -> bucket: 'bucket', path: 'path' | config keyPath: 'keyPath'"
open(GcsFile(bucket = "bucket", path = "path", id = 0), GcsConfig(keyPath = "keyPath", name = "name"))
// res1: String = "Gcs -> bucket: 'bucket', path: 'path', id: 0 | config keyPath: 'keyPath', name: 'name'"
open(S3File(bucket = "bucket", path = "path"), GcsConfig(keyPath = "keyPath", name = "name"))
// Compile time error!
open(
GcsFile(bucket = "bucket", path = "path", id = 0).asInstanceOf[StorageFile[StorageTag]],
GcsConfig(keyPath = "keyPath", name = "name").asInstanceOf[StorageConfig[StorageTag]]
)(S3.asInstanceOf[StorageTag])
// Runtime error!!!!!!!