Question

假设我有一个函数，它使用两个函数f和g作为参数，并返回一个执行f和g并返回结果的对象的函数。我还想强制f和g具有相同的签名。使用条件类型，这很容易：

type ArgumentTypes<F extends Function> = F extends (...args: infer A) => any ? A : never;
function functionPair<
    F extends (...args: any[]) => any,
    G extends (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => any
>
(f: F, g: G): (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => { f: ReturnType<F>, g: ReturnType<G> }
{
    return (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => ({ f: f(...args), g: g(...args) });
}

functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: number) => bar); // Error, incompatible signatures, as expected
functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (foo: string) => { f: string; g: number; }, as expected

现在，如果我想使f和g为可选 ，并且要使返回的对象的形状发生变化，该怎么办？也就是说，如果f或g为undefined，则应从结果对象中缺少其键：

functionPair(); // Should be () => {}
functionPair(undefined, undefined); // Should be () => {}
functionPair((foo: string) => foo); // Should be (foo: string) => { f: string }
functionPair(undefined, (bar: string) => foo.length); // Should be (bar: string) => { g: number }
functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => foo.length); // Should be (foo: string) => { f: string, g: number }, as before

我一直在尝试使用条件类型来完成此操作，但是在条件上强制执行结果函数的形状时遇到了一些麻烦。到目前为止，这是我所拥有的（严格禁用null检查）：

function functionPair<
    A extends F extends undefined ? G extends undefined ? [] : ArgumentTypes<G> : ArgumentTypes<F>,
    F extends (...args: any[]) => any = undefined,
    G extends F extends undefined ? (...args: any[]) => any : (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => any = undefined
>
(f?: F, g?: G): (...args: A) =>
    F extends undefined
    ? G extends undefined ? {} : { g: ReturnType<G> }
    : G extends undefined ? { f: ReturnType<F> } : { f: ReturnType<F>, g: ReturnType<G> }
{ /* implementation... */ }

const a = functionPair(); // () => {}, as expected
const b = functionPair((foo: string) => foo); // (foo: string) => { f: string; }, as expected
const c = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: number) => bar); // Error, incompatible signatures, as expected
const d = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (foo: string) => { f: string; g: number; }, as expected

const e = functionPair(undefined, undefined); // INCORRECT! Expected () => {}, got (...args: unknown[] | []) => {} | { f: any; } | { g: any; } | { f: any; g: any; }
const f = functionPair(undefined, (bar: string) => bar.length); // INCORRECT! Expected (bar: string) => { g: number; } but got (...args: unknown[] | [string]) => { g: number; } | { f: any; g: number; }

顺便说一句，我知道从技术上讲，重载是可行的，如下所示，但我真的很想了解没有重载的情况。

function functionPairOverloaded(): () => {}
function functionPairOverloaded(f: undefined, g: undefined): () => {}
function functionPairOverloaded<F extends (...args: any[]) => any>(f: F): (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => { f: ReturnType<F> }
function functionPairOverloaded<G extends (...args: any[]) => any>(f: undefined, g: G): (...args: ArgumentTypes<G>) => { g: ReturnType<G> }
function functionPairOverloaded<F extends (...args: any[]) => any, G extends (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => any>(f: F, g: G): (...args: ArgumentTypes<F>) => { f: ReturnType<F>, g: ReturnType<G> }
function functionPairOverloaded<F extends (...args: any[]) => any, G extends (...args: any[]) => any>(f?: F, g?: G) { /* implementation... */ }

Answer 1

假设您已打开--strictNullChecks，我想我会这样做：

type Fun = (...args: any[]) => any;
type FunFrom<F, G> = F extends Fun ? F : G extends Fun ? G : () => {};
type IfFun<F, T> = F extends Fun ? T : never;
type Ret<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R ? R : never

declare function functionPair<
  F extends Fun | undefined = undefined,
  G extends ((...args: (F extends Fun ? Parameters<F> : any[])) => any) 
    | undefined = undefined
>(
  f?: F, 
  g?: G
): (...args: Parameters<FunFrom<F, G>>) => {
  [K in IfFun<F, 'f'> | IfFun<G, 'g'>]: K extends 'f' ? Ret<F> : Ret<G> 
};

这很丑陋，但确实可以为您提供您想要的行为：

const a = functionPair(); // () => {}, as expected
const b = functionPair((foo: string) => foo); // (foo: string) => { f: string; }, as expected
const c = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: number) => bar); // Error, incompatible signatures, as expected
const d = functionPair((foo: string) => foo, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (foo: string) => { f: string; g: number; }, as expected
const e = functionPair(undefined, undefined); // () => {}, as expected
const f = functionPair(undefined, (bar: string) => bar.length); // (bar: string) => { g: number; }, as expected

我决定只使用两个类型参数F和G，而不是A使用Parameters<FunFrom<F, G>>。请注意，Parameters是类似于ArgumentTypes的内置类型函数。

另外，对于返回函数的返回类型，我做了一个难看的映射类型。我首先打算做类似IfFun<F, {f: Ret<F>}> & IfFun<G, {g: Ret<G>}>的事情，（我相信）它更容易理解，但是生成的类型{f: X, g: Y}比交点{f: X} & {g: Y}更好。

无论如何，希望能有所帮助。祝你好运！

如果您希望能够关闭--strictNullChecks，则定义会变得更加毛茸茸：

type Fun = (...args: any[]) => any;
type AsFun<F> = [F] extends [Fun] ? F : never
type FunFrom<F, G> = AsFun<IfFun<F, F, IfFun<G, G, () => {}>>>;
type IfFun<F, Y, N=never> = F extends undefined ? N : 
  0 extends (1 & F) ? N : F extends Fun ? Y : N;
type Ret<T> = T extends (...args: any[]) => infer R ? R : never

declare function functionPair<
  F extends Fun | undefined = undefined,
  G extends ((...args: IfFun<F, Parameters<F>, any[]>) => any)
  | undefined = undefined
  >(
    f?: F,
    g?: G
  ): (...args: Parameters<FunFrom<F, G>>) => {
    [K in IfFun<F, 'f'> | IfFun<G, 'g'>]: K extends 'f' ? Ret<F> : Ret<G>
  };

区别在于IfFun<>必须能够将功能与undefined和any区分开，当您关闭--strictNullChecks时，这两个功能会在不幸的地方弹出。这是因为undefined extends Function ? true : false开始返回true，并且当您将手动any值传递给函数时undefined开始被推断。区分undefined相当简单，因为Function extends undefined ? true : false仍然是false，但是区分any却很烦人并且涉及一些funny business。

祝你好运！

Typescript推断执行具有相同参数签名的可选函数参数的高阶函数的类型

1 个答案: