我有一个可以包含电子邮件和电话号码的用户模型,这两个模型都是它们自己的模型,因为它们都需要某种形式的验证。
所以我想做的是将Verification::EmailVerification
附加为email_verifications
,将Verification::PhoneVerification
附加为phone_verifications
,它们都是Verification
的STI。
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :email_verifications, as: :initiator, dependent: :destroy
has_many :phone_verifications, as: :initiator, dependent: :destroy
attr_accessor :email, :phone
def email
@email = email_verifications.last&.email
end
def email=(email)
email_verifications.new(email: email)
@email = email
end
def phone
@phone = phone_verifications.last&.phone
end
def phone=(phone)
phone_verifications.new(phone: phone)
@phone = phone
end
end
class Verification < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :initiator, polymorphic: true
end
class Verification::EmailVerification < Verification
alias_attribute :email, :information
end
class Verification::PhoneVerification < Verification
alias_attribute :phone, :information
end
但是,通过上述设置,我得到了错误uninitialized constant User::EmailVerification
。我不确定我要去哪里。
我如何构造它以便可以在用户模型上访问email_verifications
和phone_verifications
?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
When using STI you don't need (or want) polymorphic associations.
Polymorphic associations are a hack around the object-relational impedance mismatch problem used to setup a single association that points to multiple tables. For example:
class Video
has_many :comments, as: :commentable
end
class Post
has_many :comments, as: :commentable
end
class Comment
belongs_to :commentable, polymorphic: true
end
The reason they should be used sparingly is that there is no referential integrity and there are numerous problems related to joining and eager loading records which STI does not have since you have a "real" foreign key column pointing to a single table.
STI in Rails just uses the fact that ActiveRecord reads the type
column to see which class to instantiate when loading records which is also used for polymorphic associations. Otherwise it has nothing to do with polymorphism.
When you setup an association to a STI model you just have to create an association to the base inheritance class and rails will handle resolving the types by reading the type column when it loads the associated records:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :verifications
end
class Verification < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :user
end
module Verifications
class EmailVerification < ::Verification
alias_attribute :email, :information
end
end
module Verifications
class PhoneVerification < ::Verification
alias_attribute :email, :information
end
end
You should also nest your model in modules and not classes. This is partially due to a bug in module lookup that was not resolved until Ruby 2.5 and also due to convention.
If you then want to create more specific associations to the subtypes of Verification you can do it by:
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :verifications
has_many :email_verifications, ->{ where(type: 'Verifications::EmailVerification') },
class_name: 'Verifications::EmailVerification'
has_many :phone_verifications, ->{ where(type: 'Verifications::PhoneVerification') },
class_name: 'Verifications::PhoneVerification'
end
If you want to alias the association user
and call it initiator
you do it by providing the class name option to the belongs_to
association and specifying the foreign key in the has_many
associations:
class Verification < ApplicationRecord
belongs_to :initiator, class_name: 'User'
end
class User < ApplicationRecord
has_many :verifications, foreign_key: 'initiator_id'
has_many :email_verifications, ->{ where(type: 'Verifications::EmailVerification') },
class_name: 'Verifications::EmailVerification',
foreign_key: 'initiator_id'
has_many :phone_verifications, ->{ where(type: 'Verifications::PhoneVerification') },
class_name: 'Verifications::PhoneVerification',
foreign_key: 'initiator_id'
end
This has nothing to do with polymorphism though.