我碰到的大多数SHA-1实现(甚至在Wikipedia上)都针对大端运行时进行了编码。因此,我正在尝试为自己的机器实现自己的版本(小端)。
我遵循了伪代码形式Wikipedia,并具有以下代码。我找到了一个可转换字节顺序但仍未获得正确输出的函数。
#include<stdio.h>
#include<string.h>
#include<math.h>
#include<stdlib.h>
#define rotateleft(x,n) ((x<<n) | (x>>(32-n)))
unsigned int endian_reverse(unsigned int n)
{
unsigned int m = 0;
m |= n << 24;
m |= ((n >> 8) << 24) >> 8;
m |= ((n << 8) >> 24) << 8;
m |= n >> 24;
return m;
}
void SHA1(unsigned char * str1)
{
unsigned long int h0,h1,h2,h3,h4,a,b,c,d,e,f,k,temp;
h0 = 0x67452301;
h1 = 0xEFCDAB89;
h2 = 0x98BADCFE;
h3 = 0x10325476;
h4 = 0xC3D2E1F0;
unsigned char * str;
str = (unsigned char *)malloc(strlen((const char *)str1)+100);
strcpy((char *)str,(const char *)str1);
int current_length = strlen((const char *)str);
int original_length = current_length;
str[current_length] = 0x80;
str[current_length + 1] = '\0';
char ic = str[current_length];
current_length++;
int ib = current_length % 64;
int i, j;
if(ib<56)
ib = 56-ib;
else
ib = 120 - ib;
for(i=0;i < ib;i++)
{
str[current_length]=0x00;
current_length++;
}
str[current_length + 1]='\0';
for(i=0;i<6;i++)
{
str[current_length]=0x0;
current_length++;
}
str[current_length] = (original_length * 8) / 0x100 ;
current_length++;
str[current_length] = (original_length * 8) % 0x100;
current_length++;
str[current_length+i]='\0';
int number_of_chunks = current_length/64;
unsigned long int word[80];
for(i=0;i<number_of_chunks;i++)
{
for(j=0;j<16;j++)
{
word[j] =
str[i*64 + j*4 + 0] * 0x1000000 + str[i*64 + j*4 + 1] * 0x10000 +
str[i*64 + j*4 + 2] * 0x100 + str[i*64 + j*4 + 3];
}
for(j=16;j<80;j++)
{
word[j] = rotateleft((word[j-3] ^ word[j-8] ^ word[j-14] ^ word[j-16]),1);
}
a = h0;
b = h1;
c = h2;
d = h3;
e = h4;
for(int m=0;m<80;m++)
{
if(m<=19)
{
f = (b & c) | ((~b) & d);
k = 0x5A827999;
}
else if(m<=39)
{
f = b ^ c ^ d;
k = 0x6ED9EBA1;
}
else if(m<=59)
{
f = (b & c) | (b & d) | (c & d);
k = 0x8F1BBCDC;
}
else
{
f = b ^ c ^ d;
k = 0xCA62C1D6;
}
temp = (rotateleft(a,5) + f + e + k + word[m]) & 0xFFFFFFFF;
e = d;
d = c;
c = rotateleft(b,30);
b = a;
a = temp;
}
h0 = h0 + a;
h1 = h1 + b;
h2 = h2 + c;
h3 = h3 + d;
h4 = h4 + e;
}
h0 = endian_reverse(h0);
h1 = endian_reverse(h1);
h2 = endian_reverse(h2);
h3 = endian_reverse(h3);
h4 = endian_reverse(h4);
printf("\n\n");
printf("Hash: %x %x %x %x %x",h0, h1, h2, h3, h4);
printf("\n\n");
}
int main()
{
SHA1((unsigned char *)"abc");
return 0;
}
SHA-1(“ abc”):
结果
Hash: f7370736 e388302f 15815610 1ccacd49 e7649bb6
正确(实际)
Hash: a9993e36 4706816a ba3e2571 7850c26c 9cd0d89d
我是否正确或在正确的位置进行字节顺序转换?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
我是否正确或在正确的位置进行字节顺序转换?
endian_reverse(()
不是32位时,字节序转换unsigned
不正确。
未在正确的位置使用字节顺序转换。不需要字节序转换。
存在其他问题。
代码是假设 unsigned long int
是32位。当unsigned long int
是64位时,我可以获得与OP相同的答案。
节省时间:在这里没有理由使用松散类型。使用uint32_t, uint8_t
。对于数组大小和字符串长度,请使用size_t
。避免使用带符号的类型和常量。
通过更改unsigned long
-> uint32_t
并删除h0 = endian_reverse(h0); ... h7 = endian_reverse(h7);
我想到了
Hash: a9993e36 4706816a ba3e2571 7850c26c 9cd0d89d
其他建议。
64的倍数
size
中的 str = malloc(size)
应该是64的倍数
保持在64的倍数之内
str[current_length+i]='\0';
可以写外部分配。
备用尺寸存储
适用于 all size_t
个值,最多2 64-3 -1。
size_t current_length = ...
// append length in bits
uint64_t current_length_bits = current_length;
current_length_bits *= 8;
for (i = 8; i > 0; ) {
i--;
str[current_length + i] = (unsigned char) current_length_bits;
current_length_bits >>= 8;
}
current_length += 8;