我是一个完整的流利新手,虽然我在'关于多对多连接的网上找到了很多,但我在目前的情况下找不到多少。
注意:好吧,这可能是垃圾设计,我可能会更好地制作单独的表格,对设计的侮辱感谢:)
我有一张这样的表:
等课程:
[Serializable]
public class Transaction : Entity
{
[DomainSignatureAttribute]
public virtual long TransactionId { get; protected internal set; }
public virtual long AccountId { get; set; }
protected internal virtual short TransactionTypeId { get; set; }
protected internal virtual short TransactionStatusId { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime DateCreated { get; set; }
public virtual DateTime DateEffective { get; set; }
public virtual Decimal Amount { get; set; }
public virtual IList<TransactionLink> ChildTransactions { get; set; }
public virtual IList<TransactionLink> ParentTransactions { get; set; }
public Transaction()
{
ChildTransactions = new List<TransactionLink>();
ParentTransactions = new List<TransactionLink>();
}
/// <summary>
/// Use this to add a payment to a charge to pay it off, or to add a refund on a payment to un-pay it
/// </summary>
/// <param name="inTransaction"></param>
/// <param name="inAmount"></param>
public virtual void AddChildTransaction(Transaction inTransaction, Decimal inAmount)
{
TransactionLink link = new TransactionLink()
{
TransactionParent = this,
TransactionChild = inTransaction,
Amount = inAmount
};
if (!ChildTransactions.Contains(link))
ChildTransactions.Add(link);
if (!inTransaction.ParentTransactions.Contains(link))
inTransaction.ParentTransactions.Add(link);
}
/// <summary>
/// You probably shouldnt be using this.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="inTransaction"></param>
/// <param name="inAmount"></param>
public virtual void AddParentTransaction(Transaction inTransaction, Decimal inAmount)
{
TransactionLink link = new TransactionLink()
{
TransactionChild = this,
TransactionParent = inTransaction,
Amount = inAmount
};
if (!inTransaction.ChildTransactions.Contains(link))
inTransaction.ChildTransactions.Add(link);
if (!ParentTransactions.Contains(link))
ParentTransactions.Add(link);
}
}
和
[Serializable]
public class TransactionLink : Entity
{
public virtual Int64 TransactionIdParent { get; protected internal set; }
public virtual Transaction TransactionParent { get; set; }
public virtual Int64 TransactionIdChild { get; set; }
public virtual Transaction TransactionChild { get; protected internal set; }
public virtual DateTime LastModifiedOn { get; set; }
public virtual Decimal Amount { get; set; }
#region Override comparison - as this is a composite key we need to custom roll our comparison operators
#endregion
}
图:
public TransactionMap()
{
Id(x => x.TransactionId);
Map(x => x.AccountId);
Map(x => x.TransactionTypeId);
Map(x => x.TransactionStatusId);
Map(x => x.DateCreated);
Map(x => x.DateEffective);
Map(x => x.Amount);
HasMany(x => x.ParentTransactions).Cascade.None().KeyColumn("TransactionIdParent").LazyLoad();
HasMany(x => x.ChildTransactions).Cascade.All().KeyColumn("TransactionIdChild").LazyLoad();
}
和
public TransactionLinkMap()
{
CompositeId()
.KeyProperty(x => x.TransactionIdParent, "TransactionIdParent")
.KeyProperty(x => x.TransactionIdChild, "TransactionIdChild");
References(x => x.TransactionParent).Column("TransactionIdParent").Cascade.SaveUpdate().LazyLoad();
References(x => x.TransactionChild).Column("TransactionIdChild").Cascade.All().LazyLoad();
Version(x => x.LastModifiedOn);
Map(x => x.Amount);
}
我正在调整问题并从nHibernate获取各种错误 - 有人请告诉我最好的方法是什么?
答案 0 :(得分:0)
即使设置了Version()属性,nHibernate也会看到所有Transient对象都是相同的,因此当我尝试在一次点击中添加3个事务时,它就搞乱了。
这个问题的解决方案,如果有其他人遇到同样的事情,就是在多对多表中添加一个自动增量键,并将其用作nHibernate中的一个键,这使得nHibernate更容易区分瞬态物体!