我使用CompletionService提交了一些Future任务,包含2个线程的FixedThreadPool ExecutorService,我设置然后设置一个等于提交的任务数的循环,并使用completionservice.take()等待它们全部完成或失败。麻烦很偶然,它永远不会完成(但我不知道为什么)所以我将take()方法更改为轮询(300,Timeout.SECONDS),这个想法是,如果一个任务需要超过5分钟才能完成民意调查将失败,然后最终将退出循环,我可以通过所有期货并调用future.cancel(true)强制取消违规任务。
但是当我运行代码并且它挂起时,我看到轮询每5分钟一次失败并且没有更多的任务运行所以我认为这两个工作者在某种程度上陷入僵局并且永远不会完成,并且永远不会允许其他任务开始。因为超时是5分钟并且仍然有1000个任务要运行,所以打破循环所花费的时间太长所以取消了这个工作。
所以我想做的是中断/强制取消当前任务,如果在5分钟内没有完成,但我无法看到任何方法。
此代码示例显示了我正在谈论的简化版本
import com.jthink.jaikoz.exception.JaikozException;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.*;
public class CompletionServiceTest
{
public static void main(final String[] args)
{
CompletionService<Boolean> cs = new ExecutorCompletionService<Boolean>(Executors.newFixedThreadPool(2));
Collection<Worker> tasks = new ArrayList<Worker>(10);
tasks.add(new Worker(1));
tasks.add(new Worker(2));
tasks.add(new Worker(3));
tasks.add(new Worker(4));
tasks.add(new Worker(5));
tasks.add(new Worker(6));
List<Future<Boolean>> futures = new ArrayList<Future<Boolean>>(tasks.size());
try
{
for (Callable task : tasks)
{
futures.add(cs.submit(task));
}
for (int t = 0; t < futures.size(); t++)
{
Future<Boolean> result = cs.poll(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
if(result==null)
{
System.out.println("Worker TimedOut:");
continue;
}
else
{
try
{
if(result.isDone() && result.get())
{
System.out.println("Worker Completed:");
}
else
{
System.out.println("Worker Failed");
}
}
catch (ExecutionException ee)
{
ee.printStackTrace();
}
}
}
}
catch (InterruptedException ie)
{
}
finally
{
//Cancel by interrupting any existing tasks currently running in Executor Service
for (Future<Boolean> f : futures)
{
f.cancel(true);
}
}
System.out.println("Done");
}
}
class Worker implements Callable<Boolean>
{
private int number;
public Worker(int number)
{
this.number=number;
}
public Boolean call()
{
if(number==3)
{
try
{
Thread.sleep(50000);
}
catch(InterruptedException tie)
{
}
}
return true;
}
}
输出
Worker Completed:
Worker Completed:
Worker Completed:
Worker Completed:
Worker Completed:
Worker TimedOut:
Done
答案 0 :(得分:4)
我想我已经解决了它,基本上如果发生超时我会遍历我的未来对象列表并找到第一个尚未完成的对象并强制取消。看起来不那么优雅但似乎有用。
我改变了池的大小只是为了显示更好地演示解决方案的输出,但也适用于2个线程池。
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Date;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.concurrent.*;
public class CompletionServiceTest
{
public static void main(final String[] args)
{
CompletionService<Boolean> cs = new ExecutorCompletionService<Boolean>(Executors.newFixedThreadPool(1));
Collection<Worker> tasks = new ArrayList<Worker>(10);
tasks.add(new Worker(1));
tasks.add(new Worker(2));
tasks.add(new Worker(3));
tasks.add(new Worker(4));
tasks.add(new Worker(5));
tasks.add(new Worker(6));
List<Future<Boolean>> futures = new ArrayList<Future<Boolean>>(tasks.size());
try
{
for (Callable task : tasks)
{
futures.add(cs.submit(task));
}
for (int t = 0; t < futures.size(); t++)
{
System.out.println("Invocation:"+t);
Future<Boolean> result = cs.poll(10, TimeUnit.SECONDS);
if(result==null)
{
System.out.println(new Date()+":Worker Timedout:");
//So lets cancel the first futures we find that havent completed
for(Future future:futures)
{
System.out.println("Checking future");
if(future.isDone())
{
continue;
}
else
{
future.cancel(true);
System.out.println("Cancelled");
break;
}
}
continue;
}
else
{
try
{
if(result.isDone() && !result.isCancelled() && result.get())
{
System.out.println(new Date()+":Worker Completed:");
}
else if(result.isDone() && !result.isCancelled() && !result.get())
{
System.out.println(new Date()+":Worker Failed");
}
}
catch (ExecutionException ee)
{
ee.printStackTrace(System.out);
}
}
}
}
catch (InterruptedException ie)
{
}
finally
{
//Cancel by interrupting any existing tasks currently running in Executor Service
for (Future<Boolean> f : futures)
{
f.cancel(true);
}
}
System.out.println(new Date()+":Done");
}
}
class Worker implements Callable<Boolean>
{
private int number;
public Worker(int number)
{
this.number=number;
}
public Boolean call()
throws InterruptedException
{
try
{
if(number==3)
{
Thread.sleep(50000);
}
}
catch(InterruptedException ie)
{
System.out.println("Worker Interuppted");
throw ie;
}
return true;
}
}
输出
Invocation:0
Thu Mar 10 20:51:39 GMT 2011:Worker Completed:
Invocation:1
Thu Mar 10 20:51:39 GMT 2011:Worker Completed:
Invocation:2
Thu Mar 10 20:51:49 GMT 2011:Worker Timedout:
Checking future
Checking future
Checking future
Cancelled
Invocation:3
Worker Interuppted
Invocation:4
Thu Mar 10 20:51:49 GMT 2011:Worker Completed:
Invocation:5
Thu Mar 10 20:51:49 GMT 2011:Worker Completed:
Thu Mar 10 20:51:49 GMT 2011:Done
答案 1 :(得分:2)
在您的工作示例中,您的Callable在支持中断的呼叫上阻塞。如果您的实际代码在内部锁定(synchronized
块)上死锁,则您将无法通过中断取消它。相反,您可以使用显式锁定(java.util.concurrent.Lock
),它允许您指定等待锁定获取的时间。如果一个线程超时等待锁定,可能是因为它遇到了死锁情况,它可能会因错误消息而中止。
顺便说一句,在您的示例中,Callable
不应该吞下InterruptedException
。您应该将其传递(重新抛出,或将InterruptedException
添加到方法声明的throws行),或者在catch块中,重置线程的中断状态(使用Thread.currentThread().interrupt()
)。
答案 2 :(得分:1)
您随时可以致电future.get(timeout...)
如果它还没有完成,它将返回超时异常...然后你可以调用future.cancel()
。