我有两种方法可以执行80%的相同工作,但结果处理不同。我在做:
private <T> T getResponse(final RestURI query, final Class<T> responseClass) throws IOException {
T response = null;
final RestResponse<Record> tempResponse = getResponseFromDataPath(query);
if (isResponseOK(tempResponse, query)) {
final CustomReader reader = createCustomReaderFromResponse(tempResponse);
response = objectMapper.readValue(reader, responseClass);
^
// DIFFERENCE --------------------------------|
}
return response;
}
private <T> T getResponse(final RestURI query, final TypeReference valueTypeRef) throws IOException {
T response = null;
final RestResponse<Record> tempResponse = getResponseFromDataPath(query);
if (isResponseOK(tempResponse, query)) {
final CustomReader reader = createCustomReaderFromResponse(tempResponse);
response = objectMapper.readValue(reader, valueTypeRef);
^
// DIFFERENCE --------------------------------|
}
return response;
}
这看起来很重复。如何做到这一点,以减少重复。
答案 0 :(得分:5)
您可以使用调用BiFunction
的{{1}}参数:
objectMapper
呼叫者可以选择如何呼叫private <T> T getResponse(final RestURI query,
final BiFunction<CustomReader, ObjectMapper, T> mapper) throws IOException {
T response = null;
final RestResponse<Record> tempResponse = getResponseFromDataPath(query);
if (isResponseOK(tempResponse, query)) {
final CustomReader reader = createCustomReaderFromResponse(tempResponse);
response = mapper.apply(reader, objectMapper);
}
return response;
}
:
objectMapper
或者:
getResponse(query,
(reader, objectMapper) -> objectMapper.readValue(reader, <valueTypeRef>);