我有一个简单的查询,如下所示:
@DesignKey [INT] = NULL
AS
BEGIN
-- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from
-- interfering with SELECT statements.
SET NOCOUNT ON;
-- Insert statements for procedure here
IF(@DesignKey != NULL)
BEGIN
SELECT
[P].[LegacyKey] AS [Job No]
, [TT].[Name] AS [Task]
, CONCAT([E].[FirstName] , ' ' , [E].[MaidenName]) AS [Technician]
FROM [Task] AS [T]
LEFT JOIN [TaskAssignation] AS [TA] ON [T].[TaskAssignationId] = [TA].[TaskAssignationId]
LEFT JOIN [Employee] AS [E] ON [TA].[EmpKey] = [E].[EmpKey]
INNER JOIN [TaskType] AS [TT] ON [T].[TaskTypeId] = [TT].[TaskTypeId]
INNER JOIN [Design] AS [D] ON [T].[DesignKey] = [D].[DesignKey]
INNER JOIN [ProjectDesign] AS [PD] ON [D].[DesignKey] = [PD].[DesignKey]
INNER JOIN [Project] AS [P] ON [PD].[ProjectKey] = [P].[ProjectKey]
WHERE [E].[EmpKey] IS NOT NULL
AND [T].[DesignKey] = @DesignKey
END
ELSE
BEGIN
SELECT
[P].[LegacyKey] AS [Job No]
, [TT].[Name] AS [Task]
, CONCAT([E].[FirstName] , ' ' , [E].[MaidenName]) AS [Technician]
FROM [Task] AS [T]
LEFT JOIN [TaskAssignation] AS [TA] ON [T].[TaskAssignationId] = [TA].[TaskAssignationId]
LEFT JOIN [Employee] AS [E] ON [TA].[EmpKey] = [E].[EmpKey]
INNER JOIN [TaskType] AS [TT] ON [T].[TaskTypeId] = [TT].[TaskTypeId]
INNER JOIN [Design] AS [D] ON [T].[DesignKey] = [D].[DesignKey]
INNER JOIN [ProjectDesign] AS [PD] ON [D].[DesignKey] = [PD].[DesignKey]
INNER JOIN [Project] AS [P] ON [PD].[ProjectKey] = [P].[ProjectKey]
WHERE [E].[EmpKey] IS NOT NULL
END
END
如您所见,它将根据@DesignKey是否为null来执行不同的选择,因此我以以下方式执行查询:
exec usp_Get_EmpoyeeByDesign
它可以正常运行,如果我将@DesignKey发送为:
exec usp_Get_EmpoyeeByDesign @DesignKey = 2837
它加载了相同的结果,没有考虑我的if
条件,我测试了它在where子句中发送designKey参数的情况:
WHERE [E].[EmpKey] IS NOT NULL
AND [T].[DesignKey] = 2837
并引发期望结果。因此,总而言之,查询不验证@DesignKey是否到来。那里怎么了问候
答案 0 :(得分:6)
将!= NULL
替换为IS NOT NULL
。
任何使用NULL的操作都将返回NULL,而不是True。
将NULL视为“我不知道”。
你有两个篮子的苹果。其中一个有7个苹果。另一个篮子被盖住了,所以您不知道有多少个苹果。两个篮子的苹果数相同吗?他们有不同数量的苹果吗?
declare @a int, @b int
set @a = 7 -- 7 apples
set @b = NULL -- I don't know how many apples
if @a = @b
print 'Equal' -- doesn't print
if @a <> @b
print 'Not equal' -- doesn't print
由于您不知道第二个存储桶中有多少个苹果,因此不知道苹果的数量是否相等,也不知道它们是否不相等。