我查看了各种建议,以解决无法成功测试类属性的问题,并且想知道是否有人可以对我可能会出错的地方多加一些启示,这是我尝试过的所有测试错误预期已调用模拟函数,但未调用。
Search.jsx
import React, { Component } from 'react'
import { func } from 'prop-types'
import Input from './Input'
import Button from './Button'
class SearchForm extends Component {
static propTypes = {
toggleAlert: func.isRequired
}
constructor() {
super()
this.state = {
searchTerm: ''
}
this.handleSubmit = this.handleSubmit.bind(this)
}
handleSubmit = () => {
const { searchTerm } = this.state
const { toggleAlert } = this.props
if (searchTerm === 'mocky') {
toggleAlert({
alertType: 'success',
alertMessage: 'Success!!!'
})
this.setState({
searchTerm: ''
})
} else {
toggleAlert({
alertType: 'error',
alertMessage: 'Error!!!'
})
}
}
handleChange = ({ target: { value } }) => {
this.setState({
searchTerm: value
})
}
render() {
const { searchTerm } = this.state
const btnDisabled = (searchTerm.length === 0) === true
return (
<div className="well search-form soft push--bottom">
<ul className="form-fields list-inline">
<li className="flush">
<Input
id="search"
name="search"
type="text"
placeholder="Enter a search term..."
className="text-input"
value={searchTerm}
onChange={this.handleChange}
/>
<div className="feedback push-half--right" />
</li>
<li className="push-half--left">
<Button className="btn btn--positive" disabled={btnDisabled} onClick={this.handleSubmit}>
Search
</Button>
</li>
</ul>
</div>
)
}
}
export default SearchForm
第一个选项:
it('should call handleSubmit function on submit', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Search toggleAlert={jest.fn()} />)
const spy = jest.spyOn(wrapper.instance(), 'handleSubmit')
wrapper.instance().forceUpdate()
wrapper.find('.btn').simulate('click')
expect(spy).toHaveBeenCalled()
spy.mockClear()
})
第二个选项:
it('should call handleSubmit function on submit', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Search toggleAlert={jest.fn()} />)
wrapper.instance().handleSubmit = jest.fn()
wrapper.update()
wrapper.find('.btn').simulate('click')
expect(wrapper.instance().handleSubmit).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
我发现具有class属性的函数是该类的实例,需要对组件进行更新才能注册该函数,但是看起来好像要调用组件handleSubmit函数而不是模拟吗?
将handleSubmit替换为类函数可以使我可以访问类原型,该类原型可以在侦查Search.prototype时通过测试,但是我真的很想获得类属性方法的解决方案。
所有建议和建议将不胜感激!
答案 0 :(得分:5)
我认为您的单元测试应该足够健壮,以防error
发生任何不希望的代码更改的情况。
请在测试中包括严格的断言。
对于条件语句,请同时覆盖分支。例如,对于if
和else
语句,您将必须编写two
测试。
对于用户操作,您应该尝试模拟这些操作,而不是手动调用该函数。
请参见下面的示例,
import React from 'react';
import { shallow } from 'enzyme';
import { SearchForm } from 'components/Search';
describe('Search Component', () => {
let wrapper;
const toggleAlert = jest.fn();
const handleChange = jest.fn();
const successAlert = {
alertType: 'success',
alertMessage: 'Success!!!'
}
const errorAlert = {
alertType: 'error',
alertMessage: 'Error!!!'
}
beforeEach(() => {
wrapper = shallow(<SearchForm toggleAlert={toggleAlert} />);
});
it('"handleSubmit" to have been called with "mocky"', () => {
expect(toggleAlert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(handleChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
wrapper.find('Input').simulate('change', { target: { value: 'mocky' } });
expect(handleChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(wrapper.state().searchTerm).toBe('mocky');
wrapper.find('Button').simulate('click');
expect(toggleAlert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(toggleAlert).toHaveBeenCalledWith(successAlert);
expect(wrapper.state().searchTerm).toBe('');
});
it('"handleSubmit" to have been called with "other than mocky"', () => {
expect(toggleAlert).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
expect(handleChange).not.toHaveBeenCalled();
wrapper.find('Input').simulate('change', { target: { value: 'Hello' } });
expect(handleChange).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(wrapper.state().searchTerm).toBe('Hello');
wrapper.find('Button').simulate('click');
expect(toggleAlert).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(toggleAlert).toHaveBeenCalledWith(errorAlert);
expect(wrapper.state().searchTerm).toBe('Hello');
});
});
答案 1 :(得分:1)
因此,通过首先更新包装实例,然后更新包装,我设法创建了一个可行的解决方案。现在测试可以正常工作。
工作测试如下:
it('should call handleSubmit function on submit', () => {
const wrapper = shallow(<Search toggleAlert={jest.fn()} />)
wrapper.instance().handleSubmit = jest.fn()
wrapper.instance().forceUpdate()
wrapper.update()
wrapper.find('.btn').simulate('click')
expect(wrapper.instance().handleSubmit).toHaveBeenCalled()
})
答案 2 :(得分:1)
一种可行的解决方案是;
先浅析浅函数:
let handleSubmitMock = jest.fn();
LoginPage.prototype.handleSubmit = function() { handleSubmitMock() };
使用此期望值:
form.props.onSubmit();
expect(handleSubmitMock).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
答案 3 :(得分:0)
尝试类似的方法
it('should call handleSubmit function on submit', () => {
const toggleAlert = jest.fn();
const wrapper = shallow(<Search toggleAlert={toggleAlert} />)
wrapper.setState({ searchText: 'mocky' });
wrapper.find('Button').at(0).simulate('click');
expect(toggleAlert).toHaveBeenLastCalledWith({
alertType: 'success',
alertMessage: 'Success!!!'
});
})
****更新
constructor(props) {
super(props) //you have to add props to access it this.props
this.state = {
searchTerm: ''
}
this.handleSubmit = this.handleSubmit.bind(this)
}
答案 4 :(得分:0)
对于这种情况,您不需要编写单元测试。您应该能够相信该框架将触发您提供的正确处理程序。一种更有用的测试是模拟toggleAlert
道具并测试实例方法handleSubmit
的测试。这是大多数自定义逻辑将驻留的地方,因此也是我们最有可能发现错误的地方。快照测试应该适合呈现功能输出中包含的所有内容。
该组件的明智测试套件类似于以下内容:
describe('handleSubmit', () => {
let wrapper;
let spy;
describe('when searchTerm is "mocky"', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
spy = jest.fn();
wrapper = shallow(<SearchForm toggleAlert={spy} />);
wrapper.setState({ searchTerm: 'mocky' });
});
it('will fire spy with expected arguments', () => {
// verify that spy has not been fired prior to test
expect(spy).not.toBeCalled();
wrapper.instance().handleSubmit();
expect(spy).toBeCalled();
expect(spy).toBeCalledWith({
alertType: 'success',
alertMessage: 'Success!!!'
});
});
it('will set searchTerm to ""', () => {
expect(wrapper.state('searchTerm')).toBe('mocky');
wrapper.instance().handleSubmit();
expect(wrapper.state('searchTerm')).toBe('');
});
});
describe('when searchTerm is "something else"', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
spy = jest.fn();
wrapper = shallow(<SearchForm toggleAlert={spy} />);
wrapper.setState({ searchTerm: 'something else' });
});
it('will fire spy with expected arguments', () => {
// verify that spy has not been fired prior to test
expect(spy).not.toBeCalled();
wrapper.instance().handleSubmit();
expect(spy).toBeCalled();
expect(spy).toBeCalledWith({
alertType: 'error',
alertMessage: 'Error!!!'
});
});
});
});