我有一个before_flush
事件监听器,用于检查员工的经理是否已更改。在这种情况下,将在EmpManHist
表中自动创建一条记录。 manager
是对Employee
表的自引用。
这是我的表定义:
class Employee(Base):
__tablename__ = 'employees'
emp_id = Column(String, primary_key=True, unique=True)
name = Column(String, nullable=False)
manager_id = Column(String, ForeignKey('employees.emp_id'))
direct_reports = relationship('Employee', backref=backref('manager', remote_side=[emp_id]))
当我通过直接修改ForeignKey(manager_id
)将新经理分配给员工时,事件侦听器将正确地拾取它。但是当我执行实例分配时,它不会:
# this code does not pick up the manager_id change in the 'before_flush' event listener
emp2.manager = emp3
dal.session.add(emp2)
dal.session.commit()
# this does
emp2.manager_id = '1'
dal.session.add(emp2)
dal.session.commit()
那是为什么? 我正在使用python 3.6.3和sqlalchemy 1.1.13
下面是完整的工作示例:
from sqlalchemy import create_engine, Column, Integer, String, DateTime, ForeignKey
from sqlalchemy.ext.declarative import declarative_base
from sqlalchemy.orm import sessionmaker, relationship, backref
from sqlalchemy import event
from sqlalchemy.orm.attributes import get_history
import datetime
Base = declarative_base()
class DataAccessLayer(object):
def __init__(self):
self.conn_string = conn_string
self.engine = None
self.session = None
self.Session = None
self.echo = True
def connect(self):
self.engine = create_engine(self.conn_string, echo=self.echo)
Base.metadata.create_all(self.engine)
self.Session = sessionmaker(bind=self.engine)
class Employee(Base):
__tablename__ = 'employees'
emp_id = Column(String, primary_key=True, unique=True)
name = Column(String, nullable=False)
manager_id = Column(String, ForeignKey('employees.emp_id'))
direct_reports = relationship('Employee', backref=backref('manager', remote_side=[emp_id]))
class EmpManHist(Base):
__tablename__ = 'emp_man_history'
id = Column(Integer, primary_key=True)
emp_id = Column(String, ForeignKey('employees.emp_id'))
man_id_from = Column(String, ForeignKey('employees.emp_id'))
man_id_to = Column(String, ForeignKey('employees.emp_id'))
when = Column(DateTime, default=datetime.datetime.now)
manager_from = relationship('Employee', foreign_keys=[man_id_from])
manager_to = relationship('Employee', foreign_keys=[man_id_to])
conn_string = 'sqlite:///:memory:'
dal = DataAccessLayer()
dal.echo = True
dal.connect()
dal.session = dal.Session()
@event.listens_for(dal.session, 'before_flush')
def _emp_history_update(session, flush_context, instances):
print("BEFORE FLUSH")
for instance in session.dirty:
if not isinstance(instance, Employee):
continue
man_hist = get_history(instance, 'manager_id')
if man_hist.added:
if man_hist.deleted:
man_deleted = str(man_hist.deleted[0])
else:
man_deleted = None
emp_man_hist = EmpManHist(emp_id=instance.emp_id, man_id_from=man_deleted,
man_id_to=str(man_hist.added[0]))
session.add(emp_man_hist)
emp1 = Employee(emp_id='1', name="AAA")
emp2 = Employee(emp_id='2', name="BBB", manager_id='1')
emp3 = Employee(emp_id='3', name="CCC", manager_id='1')
dal.session.add(emp3)
dal.session.flush()
dal.session.add(emp1)
dal.session.add(emp2)
dal.session.commit()
# this code does not pick up the manager_id change in the 'before_flush' event listener
emp2.manager = emp3
dal.session.add(emp2)
dal.session.add(emp3)
dal.session.commit()
# this does
emp2.manager_id = '1'
dal.session.add(emp2)
dal.session.commit()
答案 0 :(得分:4)
当关系属性更改时,SQLAlchemy不会立即更新外键字段。因此,您的问题的答案是before_flush
事件是在SQLAlchemy作为Employee
操作的一部分更新flush
实例的外键值之前触发的。
如果您专门自己更新manager_id
属性,则在触发before_flush
事件之前更改属性,这就是为什么您在_emp_history_update
函数中看到更改的原因这种情况。
您仍可以使用after_flush
事件来执行所需的所有操作,因为此时session.dirty
尚未被清除。因此,我将您的事件监听器更改为:
@event.listens_for(session, 'after_flush')
def _emp_history_update(session, flush_context):
for instance in session.dirty:
if not isinstance(instance, Employee):
continue
man_hist = get_history(instance, 'manager_id')
if man_hist.added:
if man_hist.deleted:
man_deleted = str(man_hist.deleted[0])
else:
man_deleted = None
emp_man_hist = EmpManHist(emp_id=instance.emp_id, man_id_from=man_deleted,
man_id_to=str(man_hist.added[0]))
session.add(emp_man_hist)
这是测试代码:
emp1 = Employee(emp_id='1', name="AAA")
emp2 = Employee(emp_id='2', name="BBB", manager_id='1')
emp3 = Employee(emp_id='3', name="CCC", manager_id='1')
# I'm not using your DataAccessLayer object but that doesn't change anything
session.add_all([emp1, emp2, emp3])
# i've not explicitly called session.flush() as it's called by session.commit() anyway
session.commit()
# change the emp2's manager through relationship attribute
emp2.manager = emp3
# no need to re-add the Employee objects to the session
session.commit()
for change in session.query(EmpManHist).all():
print(f'Employee {change.emp_id} changed to mgr_id {change.man_id_to}')
哪个输出:
Employee 2 changed to mgr_id 3
我注意到的另一件事是事件监听器的这一部分:
if man_hist.added:
if man_hist.deleted:
man_deleted = str(man_hist.deleted[0])
else:
man_deleted = None
emp_man_hist = EmpManHist(emp_id=instance.emp_id, man_id_from=man_deleted,
man_id_to=str(man_hist.added[0]))
session.add(emp_man_hist)
通过自己直接更改属性或更改manager_id
关系属性来更改Employee
实例的Employee.manager
,切勿在{{1}}中显示实例。因此,您的man_hist.deleted
实例的man_id_from
属性始终为EmpManHist
。
这是从示例代码生成的None
到INSERT
的日志,您可以从第二行的值列表中看到第二个值,该值与{ {1}}正在分配emp_man_hist
:
man_id_from