根据Python's docs,如果未实现reversed()
,__getitem__
使用__len__
和__reversed__
。
我遇到了奇怪的行为,但无法解释:
>>> class A(dict):
... pass
...
>>> reversed(A())
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: 'A' object is not reversible
>>> class B(dict):
... def __getitem__(self, key):
... return super().__getitem__(key)
... def __len__(self):
... return super().__len__()
...
>>> reversed(B())
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
TypeError: 'B' object is not reversible
>>> class C:
... def __getitem__(self, key):
... return "item"
... def __len__(self):
... return 1
...
>>> reversed(C())
<reversed object at 0x00000000022BB9B0>
尽管在映射类型上调用reversed()
毫无意义,但它怎么知道它是映射呢?是否在内部检查isinstance(inst, dict)
?是否检查任何常规映射,例如collections.abc.Mapping
?有没有办法在不实现__reversed__
的情况下覆盖此行为?
我认为这可能是由于dict
实现了抛出__reversed__
的{{1}}或等于TypeError
的原因,就像禁用None
一样,但__hash__
却是空的,抛出了dict.__reversed__
。
答案 0 :(得分:7)
是的,在PySequence_Check
used by reversed
中有dict
类型的检查。
// cpython/Objects/enumobject.c
if (!PySequence_Check(seq)) {
PyErr_Format(PyExc_TypeError,
"'%.200s' object is not reversible",
Py_TYPE(seq)->tp_name);
return NULL;
}
// cpython/Objects/abstract.c
int
PySequence_Check(PyObject *s)
{
if (PyDict_Check(s))
return 0;
return s != NULL && s->ob_type->tp_as_sequence &&
s->ob_type->tp_as_sequence->sq_item != NULL;
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
此函数在 PEP-322 中通过 python 实现:
def reversed(x):
if hasattr(x, 'keys'):
raise ValueError("mappings do not support reverse iteration")
i = len(x)
while i > 0:
i -= 1
yield x[i]