我有以下测试设置:
public class TestingPojo {
public int getA() {
return 1;
}
@JsonView(Trimmed.class)
private String getProperty() {
return "viewproperty"; // should not be included in "default" serialization without writer view
}
}
@Test
public void testTrimmed() throws JsonProcessingException {
String result = getMapper().writerWithView(Trimmed.class).writeValueAsString(new TestingPojo());
Assert.assertFalse(result.contains("1"));
Assert.assertTrue(result.contains("viewproperty"));
}
@Test
public void testUntrimmed() throws JsonProcessingException {
String result = getMapper().writeValueAsString(new TestingPojo());
Assert.assertTrue(result.contains("1"));
Assert.assertFalse(result.contains("viewproperty")); // this should not be included as it is a private getter and @JsonView trimmed only
}
private ObjectMapper getMapper() {
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setVisibility(PropertyAccessor.GETTER, Visibility.PUBLIC_ONLY);
mapper.configure(MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION, false);
return mapper;
}
我的" testTrimmed()"工作正常,只有" viewproperty"包含在输出中,因为使用Trimmed.class
视图执行序列化。
问题在于" testUntrimmed()"没有按预期工作,因为" 1"按预期包含,但" viewproperty"也包含在序列化输出中,即使我已明确设置ObjectMapper
应该仅对公共getter进行serlialize (并且getProperty()
是私有的)。问题还在于,如果我删除" testUntrimmed()"的@JsonView
注释。这个测试按预期工作。
这是@JsonView
的问题,还是我做错了什么?如果不提供编写者视图,我该怎样做才能阻止@JsonView
带注释的getter被序列化到结果中?
默认视图包含也已关闭。
我的结论:私有@JsonView
注释的getter包含在序列化中而不提供视图这一事实对我来说似乎是一个明显的杰克逊错误
答案 0 :(得分:1)
// com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect.POJOPropertiesCollector#_addGetterMethod
protected void _addGetterMethod(Map<String, POJOPropertyBuilder> props,
AnnotatedMethod m, AnnotationIntrospector ai)
{
// Very first thing: skip if not returning any value
if (!m.hasReturnType()) {
return;
}
// any getter?
if (ai != null) {
if (ai.hasAnyGetterAnnotation(m)) {
if (_anyGetters == null) {
_anyGetters = new LinkedList<AnnotatedMember>();
}
_anyGetters.add(m);
return;
}
// @JsonValue?
if (ai.hasAsValueAnnotation(m)) {
if (_jsonValueGetters == null) {
_jsonValueGetters = new LinkedList<AnnotatedMethod>();
}
_jsonValueGetters.add(m);
return;
}
}
String implName; // from naming convention
boolean visible;
PropertyName pn = (ai == null) ? null : ai.findNameForSerialization(m);
boolean nameExplicit = (pn != null);
if (!nameExplicit) { // no explicit name; must consider implicit
implName = (ai == null) ? null : ai.findImplicitPropertyName(m);
if (implName == null) {
implName = BeanUtil.okNameForRegularGetter(m, m.getName(), _stdBeanNaming);
}
if (implName == null) { // if not, must skip
implName = BeanUtil.okNameForIsGetter(m, m.getName(), _stdBeanNaming);
if (implName == null) {
return;
}
visible = _visibilityChecker.isIsGetterVisible(m);
} else {
visible = _visibilityChecker.isGetterVisible(m);
}
} else { // explicit indication of inclusion, but may be empty
// we still need implicit name to link with other pieces
implName = (ai == null) ? null : ai.findImplicitPropertyName(m);
if (implName == null) {
implName = BeanUtil.okNameForGetter(m, _stdBeanNaming);
}
// if not regular getter name, use method name as is
if (implName == null) {
implName = m.getName();
}
if (pn.isEmpty()) {
// !!! TODO: use PropertyName for implicit names too
pn = _propNameFromSimple(implName);
nameExplicit = false;
}
visible = true;
}
boolean ignore = (ai == null) ? false : ai.hasIgnoreMarker(m);
_property(props, implName).addGetter(m, pn, nameExplicit, visible, ignore);
}
// com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.introspect.JacksonAnnotationIntrospector#findNameForSerialization
@Override
public PropertyName findNameForSerialization(Annotated a)
{
String name = null;
JsonGetter jg = _findAnnotation(a, JsonGetter.class);
if (jg != null) {
name = jg.value();
} else {
JsonProperty pann = _findAnnotation(a, JsonProperty.class);
if (pann != null) {
name = pann.value();
/* 22-Apr-2014, tatu: Should figure out a better way to do this, but
* it's actually bit tricky to do it more efficiently (meta-annotations
* add more lookups; AnnotationMap costs etc)
*/
} else if (_hasAnnotation(a, JsonSerialize.class)
|| _hasAnnotation(a, JsonView.class)
|| _hasAnnotation(a, JsonRawValue.class)
|| _hasAnnotation(a, JsonUnwrapped.class)
|| _hasAnnotation(a, JsonBackReference.class)
|| _hasAnnotation(a, JsonManagedReference.class)) {
name = "";
} else {
return null;
}
}
return PropertyName.construct(name);
}
也许你可以使用@JsonFilter来实现你的要求..只是一个建议..演示代码:
@JsonFilter("myFilter")
public class TestingPojo{
public int getA()
{
return 1;
}
@JsonView(Trimmed.class)
private String getProperty()
{
return "viewproperty"; // should not be included in "default" serialization without writer view
}
interface Trimmed {}
@Test
public void testTrimmed() throws JsonProcessingException
{
SimpleFilterProvider filterProvider = new SimpleFilterProvider();
filterProvider.addFilter("myFilter",SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAll());
String result = getMapper().writer(filterProvider).withView(Trimmed.class)
.writeValueAsString(new TestingPojo());
Assert.assertFalse(result.contains("1"));
Assert.assertTrue(result.contains("viewproperty"));
}
@Test
public void testUntrimmed() throws JsonProcessingException
{
SimpleFilterProvider filterProvider = new SimpleFilterProvider();
filterProvider.addFilter("myFilter",SimpleBeanPropertyFilter.serializeAllExcept("property"));
String result = getMapper().writer(filterProvider).writeValueAsString(new TestingPojo());
Assert.assertTrue(result.contains("1"));
Assert.assertFalse(result.contains("viewproperty")); // this should not be included as it is a private getter and @JsonView trimmed only
}
private ObjectMapper getMapper()
{
ObjectMapper mapper = new ObjectMapper();
mapper.setVisibility(
PropertyAccessor.GETTER,
JsonAutoDetect.Visibility.PUBLIC_ONLY
);
mapper.configure(MapperFeature.DEFAULT_VIEW_INCLUSION,
false);
return mapper;
}
}