我正在尝试从pypy3中的多处理文档运行remote manager example code,但是连接客户端时出错。
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:/temp/testpypy/mp_client.py", line 7, in <module>
m.connect()
File "C:\Python\pypy3-v6.0.0-win32\lib-python\3\multiprocessing\managers.py", line 455, in connect
conn = Client(self._address, authkey=self._authkey)
File "C:\Python\pypy3-v6.0.0-win32\lib-python\3\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 493, in Client
answer_challenge(c, authkey)
File "C:\Python\pypy3-v6.0.0-win32\lib-python\3\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 732, in answer_challenge
message = connection.recv_bytes(256) # reject large message
File "C:\Python\pypy3-v6.0.0-win32\lib-python\3\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 216, in recv_bytes
buf = self._recv_bytes(maxlength)
File "C:\Python\pypy3-v6.0.0-win32\lib-python\3\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 407, in _recv_bytes
buf = self._recv(4)
File "C:\Python\pypy3-v6.0.0-win32\lib-python\3\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 386, in _recv
buf.write(chunk)
TypeError: 'str' does not support the buffer interface
如果我尝试从CPython解释器连接到它(这是我的最终目标),我会收到以下错误:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
File "c:\Python\3.5.4.2\WinPython\python-3.5.4.amd64\lib\multiprocessing\managers.py", line 455, in connect
conn = Client(self._address, authkey=self._authkey)
File "c:\Python\3.5.4.2\WinPython\python-3.5.4.amd64\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 493, in Client
answer_challenge(c, authkey)
File "c:\Python\3.5.4.2\WinPython\python-3.5.4.amd64\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 737, in answer_challenge
response = connection.recv_bytes(256) # reject large message
File "c:\Python\3.5.4.2\WinPython\python-3.5.4.amd64\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 218, in recv_bytes
self._bad_message_length()
File "c:\Python\3.5.4.2\WinPython\python-3.5.4.amd64\lib\multiprocessing\connection.py", line 151, in _bad_message_length
raise OSError("bad message length")
OSError: bad message length
答案 0 :(得分:0)
原来是PyPy3中的一个错误。
这是固定票: https://bitbucket.org/pypy/pypy/issues/2841/remote-multprocessing-issue#comment-45861347