EF数据库事务可以在循环中使用吗?

时间:2018-05-07 12:02:11

标签: c# .net database entity-framework transactions

我有一个流程,我定期从数据库中检索记录,并对每个记录运行3个操作。对于每条记录,3个操作必须全部成功,或者根本不成功。如果其中一个操作失败,我希望已经处理过以前记录的操作 已提交,以便下次进程运行时,它会记录以前3个事务中的一个失败的记录。

我想在每个记录的事务中包装3个操作,并为每个记录循环,但我想确保在这种情况下使用数据库事务是有效的。以下是我的想法。这是对的吗?

    public async Task OrderCollectionProcessorWorker()
    {
        using (var context = new DbContext())
        {
            try
            {
                IList<Order> ordersToCollect =
                    await context.Orders.Where(
                        x => x.OrderStatusId == OrderStatusCodes.DeliveredId)
                              .ToListAsync(_cancellationTokenSource.Token);

                await ProcessCollectionsAsync(context, ordersToCollect);
            }
            catch (Exception ex)
            {
                Log.Error("Exception in OrderCollectionProcessorWorker", ex);
            }
        }
    }


    /// <summary>
    /// For each order to collect, perform 3 operations
    /// </summary>
    /// <param name="context">db context</param>
    /// <param name="ordersToCollect">List of Orders for collection</param>
    private async Task ProcessCollectionsAsync(DbContext context, IList<Order> ordersToCollect)
    {
        if (ordersToCollect.Count == 0) return;

        Log.Debug($"ProcessCollections: processing {ordersToCollect.Count} orders");

        foreach (var order in ordersToCollect)
        {
            // group the 3 operations in one transaction for each order
            // so that if one operation fails, the operations performend on the previous orders
            // are committed
            using (var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction())
            {
                try
                {
                    // *************************
                    // run the 3 operations here
                    // operations consist of updating the order itself, and other database updates
                    Operation1(order);
                    Operation2(order);
                    Operation3(order);

                    // *************************

                    await context.SaveChangesAsync();

                    transaction.Commit();
                }
                catch (Exception ex)
                {
                    transaction?.Rollback();                        
                    Log.Error("General exception when executing ProcessCollectionsAsync on Order " + order.Id, ex);
                    throw new Exception("ProcessCollections failed on Order " + order.Id, ex); 
                }
            }
        }
    }

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:0)

这似乎是一种正确的做法,除了事实上,在捕获中你应该重新抛出异常或做其他事情来阻止循环进展(如果我理解你的要求)。甚至没有必要使用

var transaction = context.Database.BeginTransaction()

因为

await context.SaveChangesAsync();

创建自己的交易。您所做的每项更改都存储在上下文中,当您调用SaveChanges时,会进行事务处理,并且所有更改都将写为1批。如果某些内容失败,则所有更改都将被回滚。对SaveChanges的另一次调用将对新的更改进行另一次交易。但请记住,如果事务失败,您应该不再使用相同的上下文,而是创建一个新的上下文。总结一下,我会按如下方式编写您的方法:

private async Task ProcessCollectionsAsync(DbContext context, IList<Order> ordersToCollect)
{
    if (ordersToCollect.Count == 0) return;

    Log.Debug($"ProcessCollections: processing {ordersToCollect.Count} orders");

    foreach (var order in ordersToCollect)
    {
        // group the 3 operations in one transaction for each order
        // so that if one operation fails, the operations performend on the previous orders
        // are committed
        try
        {
            // *************************
            // run the 3 operations here
            // operations consist of updating the order itself, and other database updates
            Operation1(order);
            Operation2(order);
            Operation3(order);

            // *************************

            await context.SaveChangesAsync();
        }
        catch (Exception ex)
        {                     
            Log.Error("General exception when executing ProcessCollectionsAsync on Order " + order.Id, ex);
            throw;
        }
    }