我正在为我们的铁路教堂写一个导师计划(我仍然很喜欢铁路)..
我需要对此进行建模..
contact
has_one :father, :class_name => "Contact"
has_one :mother, :class_name => "Contact"
has_many :children, :class_name => "Contact"
has_many :siblings, :through <Mother and Father>, :source => :children
所以基本上一个对象“兄弟姐妹”需要映射父亲和母亲的所有孩子,不包括对象本身。
这可能吗?
由于
丹尼尔
答案 0 :(得分:9)
如果看似简单的问题可以得到复杂的答案,这很有趣。在这种情况下,实现反身父/子关系相当简单,但添加父/母和兄弟关系会产生一些曲折。
首先,我们创建表来保存父子关系。关系有两个外键,都指向Contact:
create_table :contacts do |t|
t.string :name
end
create_table :relationships do |t|
t.integer :contact_id
t.integer :relation_id
t.string :relation_type
end
在关系模型中,我们将父亲和母亲指回联系人:
class Relationship < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :contact
belongs_to :father, :foreign_key => :relation_id, :class_name => "Contact",
:conditions => { :relationships => { :relation_type => 'father'}}
belongs_to :mother, :foreign_key => :relation_id, :class_name => "Contact",
:conditions => { :relationships => { :relation_type => 'mother'}}
end
并在Contact中定义反向关联:
class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :relationships, :dependent => :destroy
has_one :father, :through => :relationships
has_one :mother, :through => :relationships
end
现在可以创建一个关系:
@bart = Contact.create(:name=>"Bart")
@homer = Contact.create(:name=>"Homer")
@bart.relationships.build(:relation_type=>"father",:father=>@homer)
@bart.save!
@bart.father.should == @homer
这不是很好,我们真正想要的是在一次通话中建立关系:
class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
def build_father(father)
relationships.build(:father=>father,:relation_type=>'father')
end
end
所以我们可以这样做:
@bart.build_father(@homer)
@bart.save!
要查找联系人的子项,请向Contact和(为方便起见)实例方法添加范围:
scope :children, lambda { |contact| joins(:relationships).\
where(:relationships => { :relation_type => ['father','mother']}) }
def children
self.class.children(self)
end
Contact.children(@homer) # => [Contact name: "Bart")]
@homer.children # => [Contact name: "Bart")]
兄弟姐妹是棘手的部分。我们可以利用Contact.children方法并操纵结果:
def siblings
((self.father ? self.father.children : []) +
(self.mother ? self.mother.children : [])
).uniq - [self]
end
这不是最优的,因为father.children和mother.children将重叠(因此需要uniq
),并且可以通过计算必要的SQL(左侧作为练习:)来更有效地完成),但要记住self.father.children
和self.mother.children
在半兄弟姐妹(同一个父亲,不同的母亲)的情况下不会重叠,并且联系人可能没有父亲或母亲。< / p>
以下是完整的模型和一些规格:
# app/models/contact.rb
class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
has_many :relationships, :dependent => :destroy
has_one :father, :through => :relationships
has_one :mother, :through => :relationships
scope :children, lambda { |contact| joins(:relationships).\
where(:relationships => { :relation_type => ['father','mother']}) }
def build_father(father)
# TODO figure out how to get ActiveRecord to create this method for us
# TODO failing that, figure out how to build father without passing in relation_type
relationships.build(:father=>father,:relation_type=>'father')
end
def build_mother(mother)
relationships.build(:mother=>mother,:relation_type=>'mother')
end
def children
self.class.children(self)
end
def siblings
((self.father ? self.father.children : []) +
(self.mother ? self.mother.children : [])
).uniq - [self]
end
end
# app/models/relationship.rb
class Relationship < ActiveRecord::Base
belongs_to :contact
belongs_to :father, :foreign_key => :relation_id, :class_name => "Contact",
:conditions => { :relationships => { :relation_type => 'father'}}
belongs_to :mother, :foreign_key => :relation_id, :class_name => "Contact",
:conditions => { :relationships => { :relation_type => 'mother'}}
end
# spec/models/contact.rb
require 'spec_helper'
describe Contact do
before(:each) do
@bart = Contact.create(:name=>"Bart")
@homer = Contact.create(:name=>"Homer")
@marge = Contact.create(:name=>"Marge")
@lisa = Contact.create(:name=>"Lisa")
end
it "has a father" do
@bart.relationships.build(:relation_type=>"father",:father=>@homer)
@bart.save!
@bart.father.should == @homer
@bart.mother.should be_nil
end
it "can build_father" do
@bart.build_father(@homer)
@bart.save!
@bart.father.should == @homer
end
it "has a mother" do
@bart.relationships.build(:relation_type=>"mother",:father=>@marge)
@bart.save!
@bart.mother.should == @marge
@bart.father.should be_nil
end
it "can build_mother" do
@bart.build_mother(@marge)
@bart.save!
@bart.mother.should == @marge
end
it "has children" do
@bart.build_father(@homer)
@bart.build_mother(@marge)
@bart.save!
Contact.children(@homer).should include(@bart)
Contact.children(@marge).should include(@bart)
@homer.children.should include(@bart)
@marge.children.should include(@bart)
end
it "has siblings" do
@bart.build_father(@homer)
@bart.build_mother(@marge)
@bart.save!
@lisa.build_father(@homer)
@lisa.build_mother(@marge)
@lisa.save!
@bart.siblings.should == [@lisa]
@lisa.siblings.should == [@bart]
@bart.siblings.should_not include(@bart)
@lisa.siblings.should_not include(@lisa)
end
it "doesn't choke on nil father/mother" do
@bart.siblings.should be_empty
end
end
答案 1 :(得分:2)
我完全同意zetetic。这个问题看起来比答案简单得多,我们几乎无能为力。我会添加我的20c 表:
create_table :contacts do |t|
t.string :name
t.string :gender
end
create_table :relations, :id => false do |t|
t.integer :parent_id
t.integer :child_id
end
表关系没有相应的模型。
class Contact < ActiveRecord::Base
has_and_belongs_to_many :parents,
:class_name => 'Contact',
:join_table => 'relations',
:foreign_key => 'child_id',
:association_foreign_key => 'parent_id'
has_and_belongs_to_many :children,
:class_name => 'Contact',
:join_table => 'relations',
:foreign_key => 'parent_id',
:association_foreign_key => 'child_id'
def siblings
result = self.parents.reduce [] {|children, p| children.concat p.children}
result.uniq.reject {|c| c == self}
end
def father
parents.where(:gender => 'm').first
end
def mother
parents.where(:gender => 'f').first
end
end
现在我们有定期的Rails协议。所以我们可以
alice.parents << bob
alice.save
bob.chidren << cindy
bob.save
alice.parents.create(Contact.create(:name => 'Teresa', :gender => 'f')
以及所有类似的东西。
答案 2 :(得分:0)
has_and_belongs_to_many :parents,
:class_name => 'Contact',
:join_table => 'relations',
:foreign_key => 'child_id',
:association_foreign_key => 'parent_id',
:delete_sql = 'DELETE FROM relations WHERE child_id = #{id}'
has_and_belongs_to_many :children,
:class_name => 'Contact',
:join_table => 'relations',
:foreign_key => 'parent_id',
:association_foreign_key => 'child_id',
:delete_sql = 'DELETE FROM relations WHERE parent_id = #{id}'
我使用了这个例子但是必须添加:delete_sql来清理关系记录。起初我在字符串周围使用双引号但发现导致错误。切换到单引号有效。