我做过像文档here,但实时数据的价值并没有改变。请告诉我我做错了什么。 MainActivity
公共类MainActivity扩展了AppCompatActivity {
private NameViewModel mModel;
private ActivityMainBinding binding;
int index = 0;
@Override
protected void onCreate(Bundle savedInstanceState) {
super.onCreate(savedInstanceState);
binding = DataBindingUtil.setContentView(this, R.layout.activity_main);
binding.button.setOnClickListener((v) -> {
mModel.getCurrentName().setValue("Test");
});
mModel = ViewModelProviders.of(this).get(NameViewModel.class);
final Observer<String> nameObserver = (text) -> {
binding.textInputLayout.getEditText().setText(text);
};
mModel.getCurrentName().observe(this, nameObserver);
}
}
NameViewModel.java
public class NameViewModel extends ViewModel {
private MutableLiveData<String> mCurrentName;
public MutableLiveData<String> getCurrentName() {
if (mCurrentName == null) {
return new MutableLiveData<>();
}
return mCurrentName;
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
这是因为,您的逻辑每次都会返回mCurrentName
的新实例。请使用以下功能。
public class NameViewModel extends ViewModel {
private MutableLiveData<String> mCurrentName;
public MutableLiveData<String> getCurrentName() {
// Ensure there is only 1 instance of mCurrentName
if (mCurrentName == null) {
mCurrentName = new MutableLiveData<>();
}
return mCurrentName;
}
}
更好更安全的方法(减少犯错的可能性)是在构造函数中初始化mCurrentName
,并将其标记为final。
public class NameViewModel extends ViewModel {
private final MutableLiveData<String> mCurrentName;
public NameViewModel() {
mCurrentName = new MutableLiveData<>();
}
public MutableLiveData<String> getCurrentName() {
return mCurrentName;
}
}