我想要一个像Iterator::chain()
这样的方法,它只在需要时计算参数迭代器。在以下代码中,永远不应调用expensive_function
:
use std::{thread, time};
fn expensive_function() -> Vec<u64> {
thread::sleep(time::Duration::from_secs(5));
vec![4, 5, 6]
}
pub fn main() {
let nums = [1, 2, 3];
for &i in nums.iter().chain(expensive_function().iter()) {
if i > 2 {
break;
} else {
println!("{}", i);
}
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:5)
一种可能的方法:将昂贵的计算委托给迭代器适配器。
let nums = [1, 2, 3];
for i in nums.iter()
.cloned()
.chain([()].into_iter().flat_map(|_| expensive_function()))
{
if i > 2 {
break;
} else {
println!("{}", i);
}
}
传递的迭代器是将虚拟单元值()
平面映射到值列表的结果,这是惰性的。由于迭代器需要拥有该计算的相应结果,因此我选择从数组中复制数字。
答案 1 :(得分:4)
您可以创建自己的自定义迭代器适配器,仅在原始迭代器耗尽时才计算闭包。
trait IteratorExt: Iterator {
fn chain_with<F, I>(self, f: F) -> ChainWith<Self, F, I::IntoIter>
where
Self: Sized,
F: FnOnce() -> I,
I: IntoIterator<Item = Self::Item>,
{
ChainWith {
base: self,
factory: Some(f),
iterator: None,
}
}
}
impl<I: Iterator> IteratorExt for I {}
struct ChainWith<B, F, I> {
base: B,
factory: Option<F>,
iterator: Option<I>,
}
impl<B, F, I> Iterator for ChainWith<B, F, I::IntoIter>
where
B: Iterator,
F: FnOnce() -> I,
I: IntoIterator<Item = B::Item>,
{
type Item = I::Item;
fn next(&mut self) -> Option<Self::Item> {
if let Some(b) = self.base.next() {
return Some(b);
}
// Exhausted the first, generate the second
if let Some(f) = self.factory.take() {
self.iterator = Some(f().into_iter());
}
self.iterator
.as_mut()
.expect("There must be an iterator")
.next()
}
}
use std::{thread, time};
fn expensive_function() -> Vec<u64> {
panic!("You lose, good day sir");
thread::sleep(time::Duration::from_secs(5));
vec![4, 5, 6]
}
pub fn main() {
let nums = [1, 2, 3];
for i in nums.iter().cloned().chain_with(|| expensive_function()) {
if i > 2 {
break;
} else {
println!("{}", i);
}
}
}