我有一个拥有数百个输出的实体,如tap0(15 downto 0),tap1(15 downto 0),...,tap200(15 downto 0)
对于每次迭代,我想将其中四个输出分配给具有四个输入的复数乘法器实体。
例如: 在第一次迭代:
mult_in_A <= tap0;
mult_in_B <= tap1;
mult_in_C <= tap2;
mult_in_D <= tap3;
第二次迭代:
mult_in_A <= tap4;
mult_in_B <= tap5;
mult_in_C <= tap6;
mult_in_D <= tap7;
第3次迭代:
mult_in_A <= tap8;
mult_in_B <= tap9;
mult_in_C <= tap10;
mult_in_D <= tap11;
依旧......
如何通过使用某种for循环并将这些输出端口放入数组来提高上面的代码效率?这样我就可以编写如下代码:
mult_in_A <= tap_array(i);
mult_in_A <= tap_array(i+1);
mult_in_A <= tap_array(i+2);
mult_in_A <= tap_array(i+3);
更新:
以下是代码示例
ARCHITECTURE rtl_syn OF fir_filter_cntl IS
COMPONENT delay_line
PORT(
aclr : IN STD_LOGIC;
clock : IN STD_LOGIC;
clken : IN STD_LOGIC;
shiftin : IN STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
shiftout : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
taps0x : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
taps1x : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
taps2x : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
taps3x : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
...
taps128x : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0);
taps129x : OUT STD_LOGIC_VECTOR (15 DOWNTO 0));
END COMPONENT;
TYPE samples IS array (0 to 129) of std_logic_vector(15 downto 0);
SIGNAL sample_i: samples;
BEGIN
delay_line_i1 : delay_line
PORT MAP (
aclr => rx_reset,
clock => rx_clock,
clken => i_clken,
shiftin => i_sample,
shiftout => open,
taps0x => sample_i(0), -- <- this doesn't work. In simulation,
-- I observed taps0x output has some valid
-- values, but sample_i's value is unknown
taps1x => sample_i(1),
taps2x => sample_i(2),
...
taps129x => sample_i(129));
然后在某些过程中向下,我有以下内容:
sample_counter <= (others => '0');
CASE device_number IS
WHEN "000" =>
complex_mult_0I_in <= sample_i(conv_integer(sample_counter+0));
complex_mult_1I_in <= sample_i(conv_integer(sample_counter+1));
complex_mult_2I_in <= sample_i(conv_integer(sample_counter+2));
complex_mult_3I_in <= sample_i(conv_integer(sample_counter+3));
几个问题:
1.为什么以下端口分配有效?
taps0x =&gt; sample_i(0)
2.如何使用for..loop或for..generate来简化以下代码?
taps0x => sample_i(0), taps1x => sample_i(1), taps2x => sample_i(2), taps3x => sample_i(3), taps4x => sample_i(4), taps5x => sample_i(5), and so on.
答案 0 :(得分:0)
嗯,你对类型sample
做得很好......所以为什么不在界面上使用它呢?
示例:
-- custom package
library ieee;
package custom_types is
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
type std_logic_vector_vector is array (natural range <>) of std_logic_vector;
end package;
-- your component... simplified
library ieee;
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
use work.custom_types.all;
entity delay_line is
port(
-- note: 130 does not divide by 4
tapsx : out std_logic_vector_vector(0 to 127)(15 downto 0)
);
end entity;
architecture empty of delay_line is begin end architecture;
-- some entity using your component
entity use_delay_line is end entity;
library ieee;
architecture rtl of use_delay_line is
use work.custom_types.all;
signal tapsx : std_logic_vector_vector(0 to 127)(15 downto 0);
use ieee.std_logic_1164.all;
signal mult_a, mult_b, mult_c, mult_d : std_logic_vector(15 downto 0);
begin
delay_line_inst : entity work.delay_line
port map(
tapsx => tapsx
);
process
begin
for it in 0 to 31 loop
mult_a <= tapsx(it*4);
mult_b <= tapsx(it*4+1);
mult_c <= tapsx(it*4+2);
mult_d <= tapsx(it*4+3);
wait for 10 ns;
end loop;
wait;
end process;
end architecture;