我想为CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator创建自己的迁移操作,因此我创建了自己的MigrationOperation派生的迁移操作。
public class CustomMigrationOperation : MigrationOperation
{
public CustomMigrationOperation() : base(null)
{
IsDestructiveChange = false;
}
public override bool IsDestructiveChange { get; }
public override MigrationOperation Inverse => null;
}
定制的CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator。
public class CustomCSharpMigrationCodeGenerator : CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator
{
public override ScaffoldedMigration Generate(string migrationId, IEnumerable<MigrationOperation> operations, string sourceModel, string targetModel,
string @namespace, string className)
{
var extendedOperations = operations.ToList();
extendedOperations.Add(new CustomMigrationOperation());
return base.Generate(migrationId, extendedOperations, sourceModel, targetModel, @namespace, className);
}
protected virtual void Generate(CustomMigrationOperation operation, IndentedTextWriter writer)
{
// do something
}
}
当我在软件包管理器控制台中运行Add-Migration脚本时,我遇到以下异常:
Microsoft.CSharp.RuntimeBinder.RuntimeBinderException: The best overloaded method match for 'System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator.Generate(System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Model.AddColumnOperation, System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Utilities.IndentedTextWriter)' has some invalid arguments
at CallSite.Target(Closure , CallSite , CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator , Object , IndentedTextWriter )
at System.Dynamic.UpdateDelegates.UpdateAndExecuteVoid3[T0,T1,T2](CallSite site, T0 arg0, T1 arg1, T2 arg2)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator.<>c__DisplayClass35.<Generate>b__27(Object o)
at System.Data.Entity.Utilities.IEnumerableExtensions.Each[T](IEnumerable`1 ts, Action`1 action)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator.Generate(IEnumerable`1 operations, String namespace, String className)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator.Generate(String migrationId, IEnumerable`1 operations, String sourceModel, String targetModel, String namespace, String className)
at Custom.Model.CustomCSharpMigrationCodeGenerator`1.Generate(String migrationId, IEnumerable`1 operations, String sourceModel, String targetModel, String namespace, String className) in
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.DbMigrator.Scaffold(String migrationName, String namespace, Boolean ignoreChanges)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.MigrationScaffolder.Scaffold(String migrationName, Boolean ignoreChanges)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.ToolingFacade.ScaffoldRunner.Scaffold(MigrationScaffolder scaffolder)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.ToolingFacade.ScaffoldRunner.Run()
at System.AppDomain.DoCallBack(CrossAppDomainDelegate callBackDelegate)
at System.AppDomain.DoCallBack(CrossAppDomainDelegate callBackDelegate)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.ToolingFacade.Run(BaseRunner runner)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.ToolingFacade.Scaffold(String migrationName, String language, String rootNamespace, Boolean ignoreChanges)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.AddMigrationCommand.Execute(String name, Boolean force, Boolean ignoreChanges)
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.AddMigrationCommand.<>c__DisplayClass2.<.ctor>b__0()
at System.Data.Entity.Migrations.MigrationsDomainCommand.Execute(Action command)
The best overloaded method match for 'System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Design.CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator.Generate(System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Model.AddColumnOperation, System.Data.Entity.Migrations.Utilities.IndentedTextWriter)' has some invalid arguments
在对Github上的EntityFramework 6代码进行一些研究之后,我找到了应该负责调用生成器的Generate函数的行:
.Each<dynamic>(o => Generate(o, writer));
CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator on Github
我不明白为什么C#没有调用适当的Generate函数。
解决方法是从AddColumnOperation派生并覆盖Generate(AddColumnOperation操作,...)并专门处理CustomMigrationOperation。但这不仅仅是一种有效的解决方案。
答案 0 :(得分:0)
最简单的答案是DLR无法确定方法。
作为概念验证的示例,这是一个简化的变体控制台应用程序,显示了完全相同的行为。
using MicrosoftGenerator;
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
namespace AddMigrationRunner {
class Program {
static void Main(string[] args) {
var generator = (Generator) new Something.Deep.Somewhere.MyCustomGenerator(); // reverse casted simply to dictate the "angle" from which we are coming.
// PMC:> Add-Migration MyMigrationName
generator.AddMigration("MyMigrationName");
}
}
}
namespace MicrosoftGenerator {
// meant to be a rough "clone" of: https://github.com/mono/entityframework/blob/master/src/EntityFramework/Migrations/Design/CSharpMigrationCodeGenerator.cs
public class Generator {
private List<MigrationOperation> operations = new List<MigrationOperation>() { };
public Generator() {
operations.Add(new AddColumnOperation());
}
public void AddMigration(string name) {
Generate(name, operations);
}
public virtual void Generate(string migrationId, IEnumerable<MigrationOperation> operations) {
Console.WriteLine("Up() method generating..");
operations.Each<dynamic>(o => Generate(o));
}
protected void Generate(AddColumnOperation op) {
Console.WriteLine("<AddColumnOperation> execute.");
}
}
public class AddColumnOperation : MigrationOperation {}
public class MigrationOperation {}
//https://github.com/mono/entityframework/blob/master/src/Common/IEnumerableExtensions.cs
public static class MicrosoftUtilities {
public static void Each<T>(this IEnumerable<T> ts, Action<T> action) {
foreach (var t in ts) {
action(t);
}
}
}
}
namespace Something.Deep.Somewhere {
public class MyCustomGenerator : Generator {
public MyCustomGenerator() : base() {
}
public override void Generate(string migrationId, IEnumerable<MigrationOperation> operations) {
var extendedOperations = operations.ToList();
extendedOperations.Add(new MyCustomOperation());
base.Generate(migrationId, extendedOperations);
}
protected void Generate(MyCustomOperation op) {
Console.WriteLine("<MyCustomOperation> execute.");
}
}
public class MyCustomOperation : MigrationOperation {
}
}
因此,通过将自定义.Each操作执行程序拆分为一个foreach,我们可以看到,如果进行了适当的编码,它确实可以正常工作。
//operations.Each<dynamic>(o => Generate(o));
foreach(var op in operations) {
Type op_type = op.GetType();
var actionT = typeof (Action<>).MakeGenericType(op_type);
var methodInfo = this.GetType().GetMethod("Generate", BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Instance, null, new Type[] { op_type }, null);
methodInfo.Invoke(this, new object[]{ op });
}
在这一点上,我不胜枚举,以解释为什么带有有效对象和实例的委托操作无法自行解决。
我想这是一个很好的例子,说明了为什么您不应该懒惰地使用dynamic
。 咳嗽 @microsoft。
如果不修改EntityFramework源代码,我看不出任何解决方法。
如果还不使用运行时绑定的Extension方法将其作为硬dynamic
参数化操作执行,则可以使用<type>
。因为如果将其保留为dynamic
,它将保持运行时绑定。
如您所证明的那样(行之有效!),您可以修改其根Generate
方法(如上述示例所示):
public virtual void Generate(string migrationId, IEnumerable<MigrationOperation> operations) {
Console.WriteLine("Up() method generating..");
operations.Each<dynamic>(o => ((dynamic)this).Generate(o));
}
请注意((dynamic)this)
强制转换前缀。
P.s.我从here收集了这一决心。
有3件事:
因此,如果您希望像我们俩一样保持代码干净,我能想到的唯一解决方案是不调用base.Generate()
,而是实现其源代码的复制/粘贴;这样您就可以覆盖他们对.Each
的扩展方法delegate
的调用。对于nuget更新和将来的开发人员(不知道他们的工作),这显然是有问题的。
一个人必须变脏才能清洁。我一点都不喜欢。