????
应该是什么想法?内置了吗?
什么是完成这项任务的最佳方法?
(def v ["one" "two" "three" "two"])
(defn find-thing [ thing vectr ]
(????))
(find-thing "two" v) ; ? maybe 1, maybe '(1,3), actually probably a lazy-seq
答案 0 :(得分:119)
内置:
user> (def v ["one" "two" "three" "two"])
#'user/v
user> (.indexOf v "two")
1
user> (.indexOf v "foo")
-1
如果你想要所有匹配的索引的延迟seq:
user> (map-indexed vector v)
([0 "one"] [1 "two"] [2 "three"] [3 "two"])
user> (filter #(= "two" (second %)) *1)
([1 "two"] [3 "two"])
user> (map first *1)
(1 3)
user> (map first
(filter #(= (second %) "two")
(map-indexed vector v)))
(1 3)
答案 1 :(得分:40)
Stuart Halloway在这篇文章http://www.mail-archive.com/clojure@googlegroups.com/msg34159.html中给出了一个非常好的答案。
(use '[clojure.contrib.seq :only (positions)])
(def v ["one" "two" "three" "two"])
(positions #{"two"} v) ; -> (1 3)
如果您想获取第一个值,只需在结果上使用first
。
(first (positions #{"two"} v)) ; -> 1
编辑:因为clojure.contrib.seq
已经消失了,我用一个简单的实现示例更新了我的答案:
(defn positions
[pred coll]
(keep-indexed (fn [idx x]
(when (pred x)
idx))
coll))
答案 2 :(得分:24)
(defn find-thing [needle haystack]
(keep-indexed #(when (= %2 needle) %1) haystack))
但是我想警告你不要摆弄指数:通常情况下它会产生较少惯用,笨拙的Clojure。
答案 3 :(得分:13)
从Clojure 1.4开始,clojure.contrib.seq(以及positions
函数)不可用,因为它缺少维护者:
http://dev.clojure.org/display/design/Where+Did+Clojure.Contrib+Go
clojure.contrib.seq/positions
及其依赖关系clojure.contrib.seq/indexed
的来源是:
(defn indexed
"Returns a lazy sequence of [index, item] pairs, where items come
from 's' and indexes count up from zero.
(indexed '(a b c d)) => ([0 a] [1 b] [2 c] [3 d])"
[s]
(map vector (iterate inc 0) s))
(defn positions
"Returns a lazy sequence containing the positions at which pred
is true for items in coll."
[pred coll]
(for [[idx elt] (indexed coll) :when (pred elt)] idx))
(positions #{2} [1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4]) => (1 5)
此处可用:http://clojuredocs.org/clojure_contrib/clojure.contrib.seq/positions
答案 4 :(得分:5)
我试图回答我自己的问题,但布莱恩用更好的答案打败了我!
(defn indices-of [f coll]
(keep-indexed #(if (f %2) %1 nil) coll))
(defn first-index-of [f coll]
(first (indices-of f coll)))
(defn find-thing [value coll]
(first-index-of #(= % value) coll))
(find-thing "two" ["one" "two" "three" "two"]) ; 1
(find-thing "two" '("one" "two" "three")) ; 1
;; these answers are a bit silly
(find-thing "two" #{"one" "two" "three"}) ; 1
(find-thing "two" {"one" "two" "two" "three"}) ; nil
答案 5 :(得分:2)
我最近不得不多次找到索引,或者我选择了索引,因为它比找出另一种解决问题的方法更容易。在此过程中,我发现我的Clojure列表没有.indexOf(Object object,int start)方法。我像这样处理问题:
(defn index-of
"Returns the index of item. If start is given indexes prior to
start are skipped."
([coll item] (.indexOf coll item))
([coll item start]
(let [unadjusted-index (.indexOf (drop start coll) item)]
(if (= -1 unadjusted-index)
unadjusted-index
(+ unadjusted-index start)))))
答案 6 :(得分:2)
这是我的贡献,使用loop
结构并在失败时返回nil
。
我尽量避免循环,但这似乎适合这个问题。
(defn index-of [xs x]
(loop [a (first xs)
r (rest xs)
i 0]
(cond
(= a x) i
(empty? r) nil
:else (recur (first r) (rest r) (inc i)))))
答案 7 :(得分:0)
我会用reduce-kv
(defn find-index [pred vec]
(reduce-kv
(fn [_ k v]
(if (pred v)
(reduced k)))
nil
vec))
答案 8 :(得分:0)
如果我们需要第一个索引,我们不需要循环整个集合。 some
函数将在第一次匹配后短路。
(defn index-of [x coll]
(let [idx? (fn [i a] (when (= x a) i))]
(first (keep-indexed idx? coll))))