我正在开发一个简单的FIFO队列来同步服务器进程的多个实例。
这非常相似 Linux synchronization with FIFO waiting queue，除了处理多个进程而不是线程。我改编caf's ticket lock以使用共享内存段中的进程共享互斥和条件变量。它还处理超时，以防一个进程在处理请求时死亡：
#include <assert.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/types.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <sys/mman.h>
#include <pthread.h>
#include <signal.h>
#include <errno.h>
static inline void fail(char *str)
{
perror(str);
exit(1);
}
/***************************************************************************************************/
/* Simple ticket lock queue with pthreads
* https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3050083/linux-synchronization-with-fifo-waiting-queue
*/
typedef struct ticket_lock {
pthread_mutex_t mutex;
pthread_cond_t cond;
int queue_head, queue_tail;
} ticket_lock_t;
static void
ticket_init(ticket_lock_t *t)
{
pthread_mutexattr_t mattr;
pthread_mutexattr_init(&mattr);
pthread_mutexattr_setpshared(&mattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
pthread_mutexattr_setrobust(&mattr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ROBUST);
pthread_mutex_init(&t->mutex, &mattr);
pthread_mutexattr_destroy(&mattr);
pthread_condattr_t cattr;
pthread_condattr_init(&cattr);
pthread_condattr_setpshared(&cattr, PTHREAD_PROCESS_SHARED);
pthread_cond_init(&t->cond, &cattr);
pthread_condattr_destroy(&cattr);
t->queue_head = t->queue_tail = 0;
}
static void
ticket_broadcast(ticket_lock_t *ticket)
{
pthread_cond_broadcast(&ticket->cond);
}
static int
ticket_lock(ticket_lock_t *ticket)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&ticket->mutex);
int queue_me = ticket->queue_tail++;
while (queue_me > ticket->queue_head) {
time_t sec = time(NULL) + 5; /* 5s timeout */
struct timespec ts = { .tv_sec = sec, .tv_nsec = 0 };
fprintf(stderr, "%i: waiting, current: %i me: %i\n", getpid(), ticket->queue_head, queue_me);
if (pthread_cond_timedwait(&ticket->cond, &ticket->mutex, &ts) == 0)
continue;
if (errno != ETIMEDOUT) fail("pthread_cond_timedwait");
/* Timeout, kick current user... */
fprintf(stderr, "kicking stale ticket %i\n", ticket->queue_head);
ticket->queue_head++;
ticket_broadcast(ticket);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ticket->mutex);
return queue_me;
}
static void
ticket_unlock(ticket_lock_t *ticket, int me)
{
pthread_mutex_lock(&ticket->mutex);
if (ticket->queue_head == me) { /* Normal case: we haven't timed out. */
ticket->queue_head++;
ticket_broadcast(ticket);
}
pthread_mutex_unlock(&ticket->mutex);
}
/***************************************************************************************************/
/* Shared memory */
#define SHM_NAME "fifo_sched"
#define SHM_MAGIC 0xdeadbeef
struct sched_shm {
int size;
int magic;
int ready;
/* sched stuff */
ticket_lock_t queue;
};
static unsigned int shm_size = 256;
static struct sched_shm *shm = 0;
/* Create new shared memory segment */
static void
create_shm()
{
int fd = shm_open(SHM_NAME, O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_TRUNC, 0644);
assert(fd != -1);
int r = ftruncate(fd, shm_size); assert(r == 0);
void *pt = mmap(0, shm_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
assert(pt != MAP_FAILED);
fprintf(stderr, "Created shared memory.\n");
shm = pt;
memset(shm, 0, sizeof(*shm));
shm->size = shm_size;
shm->magic = SHM_MAGIC;
shm->ready = 0;
ticket_init(&shm->queue);
shm->ready = 1;
}
/* Attach existing shared memory segment */
static int
attach_shm()
{
int fd = shm_open(SHM_NAME, O_RDWR, 0);
if (fd == -1) return 0; /* Doesn't exist yet... */
shm = mmap(0, shm_size, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE, MAP_SHARED, fd, 0);
if (shm == MAP_FAILED) fail("mmap");
fprintf(stderr, "Mapped shared memory.\n");
assert(shm->magic == SHM_MAGIC);
assert(shm->ready);
return 1;
}
static void
shm_init()
{
fprintf(stderr, "shm_init()\n");
assert(shm_size >= sizeof(struct sched_shm));
if (!attach_shm())
create_shm();
}
/***************************************************************************************************/
int main()
{
shm_init();
while (1) {
int ticket = ticket_lock(&shm->queue);
printf("%i: start %i\n", getpid(), ticket);
printf("%i: done %i\n", getpid(), ticket);
ticket_unlock(&shm->queue, ticket);
}
return 0;
}
这可以很好地独立运行，同时添加额外的流程：
$ gcc -g -Wall -std=gnu99 -o foo foo.c -lpthread -lrt
$ ./foo
$ ./foo # (in other term)
...
26370: waiting, current: 134803 me: 134804
26370: start 134804
26370: done 134804
26370: waiting, current: 134805 me: 134806
26370: start 134806
26370: done 134806
26370: waiting, current: 134807 me: 134808
然而，杀死第二个实例会破坏第一个中的pthread_cond_timedwait（）：
pthread_cond_timedwait: No such file or directory
这在某种程度上是有道理的，条件变量是跟踪这个过程而已经不存在了。
当然必须有办法从中恢复？
答案 0 :(得分：1)
[评论太久了]
pthread_cond_timedwait: No such file or directory
胡！ ： - ）
pthread_*()系列函数不会将 errno设置为任何错误代码，但会返回。
因此，要获得任何可用的结果，请更改此
if (pthread_cond_timedwait(&ticket->cond, &ticket->mutex, &ts) == 0)
continue;
if (errno != ETIMEDOUT) fail("pthread_cond_timedwait");
是
if ((errno = pthread_cond_timedwait(&ticket->cond, &ticket->mutex, &ts)) == 0)
continue;
if (errno != ETIMEDOUT) fail("pthread_cond_timedwait");
答案 1 :(得分：1)
好的，引用posix pthread_mutex_lock()引用：
如果互斥锁是一个健壮的互斥锁，并且在持有互斥锁时终止了包含拥有线程的进程，则对pthread_mutex_lock（）的调用将返回错误值[EOWNERDEAD]。 [...]在这些情况下，互斥锁被线程锁定，但它保护的状态被标记为不一致。应用程序应确保使状态一致以便重用，并在完成时调用pthread_mutex_consistent（）。如果应用程序无法恢复状态，则应在未事先调用pthread_mutex_consistent（）的情况下解锁互斥锁，之后将互斥锁标记为永久不可用。
所以除了alk的注释以强大地处理死锁互斥锁的进程之外，我们需要在调用pthread_mutex_lock（）和pthread_cond_timedwait（）时监视EOWNERDEAD，并在其上调用pthread_mutex_consistent（）。
类似的东西：
if ((errno = pthread_cond_timedwait(&ticket->cond, &ticket->mutex, &ts)) == 0)
continue;
if (errno == EOWNERDEAD) /* Recover mutex owned by dead process */
pthread_mutex_consistent(&ticket->mutex);
else if (errno != ETIMEDOUT)
fail("pthread_cond_timedwait");