I have looked at this Q/A Intent of this Fotran77 code and I have almost converted the below Fortran77 style code into Python 3.x except I had a doubt where the i = i + 1 should be placed in the Python version. As mentioned in the comments of the linked question I have done the conformance tests and the results are off by a margin of 2. Hence the question.
itemManager
Here is my Python version
i = 0
500 continue
i = i +1
if (i .le. ni) then
if (u(i,j-1) .gt. -9999.) then
r(1,j) = u(i,j-1)
go to 600
else
missing = i
go to 500
end if
end if
600 continue
Did I place the increment counter at the right location ?
答案 0 :(得分:3)
不建议直接翻译,因为你放弃了许多高效的python编码功能。
要在python中正确地执行此操作,您应该1)识别python的0索引约定,并且2)认识到fortran是列主要而python是行主要因此您应该反转所有多维数组的索引顺序
如果你这样做,可以写出循环:
try:
r[j,0]=[val for val in u[j] if val > -9999 ][0]
missing=False
except:
missing=True
我假设我们实际上并不需要丢失的数值。 如果你需要它,你会有这样的东西:
try:
missing,r[j,0]=[(index,val) for (index,val) in enumerate(u[j]) if val > -9999 ][0]
except:
missing=-1
您也可以使用速度更快的next
,但处理丢失的情况会变得有点棘手。