我使用Angular TestBed进行了一些单元测试。即使测试非常简单,它们也会非常慢(每秒平均1次测试)
即使在重新阅读Angular文档之后,我也找不到性能如此糟糕的原因。
隔离测试,不使用TestBed,只需几秒钟即可完成。
单元测试
import { Component } from "@angular/core";
import { ComponentFixture, TestBed, async } from "@angular/core/testing";
import { By } from "@angular/platform-browser";
import { DebugElement } from "@angular/core";
import { DynamicFormDropdownComponent } from "./dynamicFormDropdown.component";
import { NgbModule } from "@ng-bootstrap/ng-bootstrap";
import { FormsModule } from "@angular/forms";
import { DropdownQuestion } from "../../element/question/questionDropdown";
import { TranslateService } from "@ngx-translate/core";
import { TranslatePipeMock } from "../../../../tests-container/translate-pipe-mock";
describe("Component: dynamic drop down", () => {
let component: DynamicFormDropdownComponent;
let fixture: ComponentFixture<DynamicFormDropdownComponent>;
let expectedInputQuestion: DropdownQuestion;
const emptySelectedObj = { key: "", value: ""};
const expectedOptions = {
key: "testDropDown",
value: "",
label: "testLabel",
disabled: false,
selectedObj: { key: "", value: ""},
options: [
{ key: "key_1", value: "value_1" },
{ key: "key_2", value: "value_2" },
{ key: "key_3", value: "value_3" },
],
};
beforeEach(async(() => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
imports: [NgbModule.forRoot(), FormsModule],
declarations: [DynamicFormDropdownComponent, TranslatePipeMock],
providers: [TranslateService],
})
.compileComponents();
}));
beforeEach(() => {
fixture = TestBed.createComponent(DynamicFormDropdownComponent);
component = fixture.componentInstance;
expectedInputQuestion = new DropdownQuestion(expectedOptions);
component.question = expectedInputQuestion;
});
it("should have a defined component", () => {
expect(component).toBeDefined();
});
it("Must have options collapsed by default", () => {
expect(component.optionsOpen).toBeFalsy();
});
it("Must toggle the optionsOpen variable calling openChange() method", () => {
component.optionsOpen = false;
expect(component.optionsOpen).toBeFalsy();
component.openChange();
expect(component.optionsOpen).toBeTruthy();
});
it("Must have options available once initialized", () => {
expect(component.question.options.length).toEqual(expectedInputQuestion.options.length);
});
it("On option button click, the relative value must be set", () => {
spyOn(component, "propagateChange");
const expectedItem = expectedInputQuestion.options[0];
fixture.detectChanges();
const actionButtons = fixture.debugElement.queryAll(By.css(".dropdown-item"));
actionButtons[0].nativeElement.click();
expect(component.question.selectedObj).toEqual(expectedItem);
expect(component.propagateChange).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expectedItem.key);
});
it("writeValue should set the selectedObj once called (pass string)", () => {
expect(component.question.selectedObj).toEqual(emptySelectedObj);
const expectedItem = component.question.options[0];
component.writeValue(expectedItem.key);
expect(component.question.selectedObj).toEqual(expectedItem);
});
it("writeValue should set the selectedObj once called (pass object)", () => {
expect(component.question.selectedObj).toEqual(emptySelectedObj);
const expectedItem = component.question.options[0];
component.writeValue(expectedItem);
expect(component.question.selectedObj).toEqual(expectedItem);
});
});
目标组件(带模板)
import { Component, Input, OnInit, ViewChild, ElementRef, forwardRef } from "@angular/core";
import { FormGroup, ControlValueAccessor, NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR } from "@angular/forms";
import { DropdownQuestion } from "../../element/question/questionDropdown";
@Component({
selector: "df-dropdown",
templateUrl: "./dynamicFormDropdown.component.html",
styleUrls: ["./dynamicFormDropdown.styles.scss"],
providers: [
{
provide: NG_VALUE_ACCESSOR,
useExisting: forwardRef(() => DynamicFormDropdownComponent),
multi: true,
},
],
})
export class DynamicFormDropdownComponent implements ControlValueAccessor {
@Input()
public question: DropdownQuestion;
public optionsOpen: boolean = false;
public selectItem(key: string, value: string): void {
this.question.selectedObj = { key, value };
this.propagateChange(this.question.selectedObj.key);
}
public writeValue(object: any): void {
if (object) {
if (typeof object === "string") {
this.question.selectedObj = this.question.options.find((item) => item.key === object) || { key: "", value: "" };
} else {
this.question.selectedObj = object;
}
}
}
public registerOnChange(fn: any) {
this.propagateChange = fn;
}
public propagateChange = (_: any) => { };
public registerOnTouched() {
}
public openChange() {
if (!this.question.disabled) {
this.optionsOpen = !this.optionsOpen;
}
}
private toggle(dd: any) {
if (!this.question.disabled) {
dd.toggle();
}
}
}
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
<div>
<div (openChange)="openChange();" #dropDown="ngbDropdown" ngbDropdown class="wrapper" [ngClass]="{'disabled-item': question.disabled}">
<input type="text"
[disabled]="question.disabled"
[name]="controlName"
class="select btn btn-outline-primary"
[ngModel]="question.selectedObj.value | translate"
[title]="question.selectedObj.value"
readonly ngbDropdownToggle #selectDiv/>
<i (click)="toggle(dropDown);" [ngClass]="optionsOpen ? 'arrow-down' : 'arrow-up'" class="rchicons rch-003-button-icon-referenzen-pfeil-akkordon"></i>
<div ngbDropdownMenu aria-labelledby="dropdownBasic1" class="option-wrapper">
<button *ngFor="let opt of question.options; trackBy: opt?.key" (click)="selectItem(opt.key, opt.value); dropDown.close();"
class="dropdown-item option" [disabled]="question.disabled">{{opt.value | translate}}</button>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Karma config
var webpackConfig = require('./webpack/webpack.dev.js');
module.exports = function (config) {
config.set({
basePath: '',
frameworks: ['jasmine'],
plugins: [
require('karma-webpack'),
require('karma-jasmine'),
require('karma-phantomjs-launcher'),
require('karma-sourcemap-loader'),
require('karma-tfs-reporter'),
require('karma-junit-reporter'),
],
files: [
'./app/polyfills.ts',
'./tests-container/test-bundle.spec.ts',
],
exclude: [],
preprocessors: {
'./app/polyfills.ts': ['webpack', 'sourcemap'],
'./tests-container/test-bundle.spec.ts': ['webpack', 'sourcemap'],
'./app/**/!(*.spec.*).(ts|js)': ['sourcemap'],
},
webpack: {
entry: './tests-container/test-bundle.spec.ts',
devtool: 'inline-source-map',
module: webpackConfig.module,
resolve: webpackConfig.resolve
},
mime: {
'text/x-typescript': ['ts', 'tsx']
},
reporters: ['progress', 'junit', 'tfs'],
port: 9876,
colors: true,
logLevel: config.LOG_INFO,
autoWatch: true,
browsers: ['PhantomJS'],
singleRun: false,
concurrency: Infinity
})
}
答案 0 :(得分:17)
事实证明,问题在于Github
上的Angular根据Github讨论的解决方法,将运行测试的时间从40秒减少到1秒!
const oldResetTestingModule = TestBed.resetTestingModule;
beforeAll((done) => (async () => {
TestBed.resetTestingModule();
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
// ...
});
function HttpLoaderFactory(http: Http) {
return new TranslateHttpLoader(http, "/api/translations/", "");
}
await TestBed.compileComponents();
// prevent Angular from resetting testing module
TestBed.resetTestingModule = () => TestBed;
})()
.then(done)
.catch(done.fail));
答案 1 :(得分:3)
弗朗切斯科的上述答案很不错,但最后需要此代码。否则,其他测试套件将失败。
afterAll(() => {
TestBed.resetTestingModule = oldResetTestingModule;
TestBed.resetTestingModule();
});
答案 2 :(得分:2)
MasterDetailPage
创建新文件:
describe('Test name', () => {
configureTestSuite();
beforeAll(done => (async () => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
imports: [HttpClientTestingModule, NgReduxTestingModule],
providers: []
});
await TestBed.compileComponents();
})().then(done).catch(done.fail));
it(‘your test', (done: DoneFn) => {
});
});
答案 3 :(得分:1)
您可能想尝试ng-bullet。 它大大提高了Angular单元测试的执行速度。 还建议将其用于有关测试台单元测试性能的官方角度回购问题:https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/12409#issuecomment-425635583
重点是替换每个测试文件标题中的原始 beforeEach
beforeEach(async(() => {
// a really simplified example of TestBed configuration
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [ /*list of components goes here*/ ],
imports: [ /* list of providers goes here*/ ]
})
.compileComponents();
}));
使用 configureTestSuite :
import { configureTestSuite } from 'ng-bullet';
...
configureTestSuite(() => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({
declarations: [ /*list of components goes here*/ ],
imports: [ /* list of providers goes here*/ ]
})
});
答案 4 :(得分:1)
2020年10月更新
将angular应用程序升级到Angular 9 可以改善测试运行时间,
如果您希望使用最新版本,则以下软件包可帮助我提高测试性能:
Ng-Bullet是一个库,可通过Angular TestBed增强您的单元测试体验,从而大大提高测试的执行速度。
它将要做的是,它不会一直创建测试套件,而是使用以前创建的套件,通过使用它,我看到了300%的测试运行。
答案 5 :(得分:0)
这可能取决于您用于测试的浏览器。对于我来说,ChromeHeadless明显更快(〜1分钟):
ng test --single-run --browsers ChromeHeadless
比PhantomJS(〜3分钟):
ng test --single-run --browsers PhantomJS
答案 6 :(得分:0)
我做了一个小功能,可以用来加快速度。其效果类似于其他答案中提到的ng-bullet
,但仍会清理测试之间的服务,以使它们不会泄漏状态。该函数为precompileForTests
,可在n-ng-dev-utils
中使用。
像这样使用它(来自其文档):
// let's assume `AppModule` declares or imports a `HelloWorldComponent`
precompileForTests([AppModule]);
// Everything below here is the same as normal. Just add the line above.
describe("AppComponent", () => {
it("says hello", async () => {
TestBed.configureTestingModule({ declarations: [HelloWorldComponent] });
await TestBed.compileComponents(); // <- this line is faster
const fixture = TestBed.createComponent(HelloWorldComponent);
expect(fixture.nativeElement.textContent).toContain("Hello, world!");
});
});
答案 7 :(得分:0)
Yoav Schniederman的答案对我很有帮助。要补充,我们需要清理<style>
标签中的<head>
,因为它们也导致内存泄漏。清理afterAll()
中的所有样式也可以改善性能。
请阅读original post供参考
答案 8 :(得分:0)
在我的特定情况下,它会延迟,因为我们在组件样式“component.component.scss”中导入了 style.scss(也导入了其他巨大的样式),这会为每个组件模板生成递归样式。>
为避免这种情况,请仅在组件中导入 scss 变量、mixin 和类似内容。