我正在实现一个简单的shell程序,&
和|
的实现按预期工作。
但是,我想处理中断,以便在收到SIGINT的情况下,父(shell)和后台进程不应该终止,但任何前台进程都应该终止。
我已经初始化了一个信号和一个处理程序,但我想得到建议如何为每个进程不同地处理它。
void intHandler() {
flagInt = 0;
fprintf(stderr, "interrupt\n");
}
int process_arglist(int count, char** arglist) {
struct sigaction childSig;
struct sigaction intSig;
intSig.sa_handler = intHandler;
sigaction(SIGINT, &intSig, NULL);
//initialize intSig
int flagBg = 0; //turned to 1 in case there's a &
int flagPipe = 0; //turned to 1 in case there's a |
int index = 0; //index of | 0 if there's none
//Check if there's & and set flagBg and sigaction
if (strcmp(arglist[count - 1], "&") == 0) {
flagBg = 1;
childSig.sa_handler = SIG_IGN;
childSig.sa_flags = 0;
if(sigaction(SIGCHLD, &childSig, NULL)<0){
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: sigaction failed\n");
exit(1);
}
}
//Look for pipes
int i = 0;
while (i < count) {
if (strcmp(arglist[i], "|") == 0) {
flagPipe = 1;
index = i;
}
i = i + 1;
}
//Handle &
if (flagBg == 1) {
int pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) { //check if fork failed
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: fork failed\n");
return 1;
}
if (pid == 0) { // Child's process
arglist[count - 1] = NULL;
if (execvp(*arglist, arglist) < 0) { //execute the command
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: execvp failed\n");
exit(1);
}
}
if (pid > 0) { //Parent's process
return 1;
}
}
//Handle |
if (flagPipe == 1) {
//create a new process
arglist[index] = NULL;
int fd[2];
if(pipe(fd)<0){
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: pipe failed\n");
exit(1);
}
int pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) { //check if fork failed
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: fork failed\n");
return 1;
}
if (pid == 0) { // Child's process
close(STDOUT_FILENO);
dup(fd[1]);
close(fd[0]);
close(fd[1]);
if (execvp(*arglist, arglist) < 0) { //execute the first part of the commands
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: execvp failed\n");
exit(1);
}
}
if (pid > 0) { //Parent's process
int pid2 = fork();
if (pid2 < 0) {
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: fork failed\n");
return 1;
}
if (pid2 == 0) { // Child's process
close(STDIN_FILENO);
dup(fd[0]);
close(fd[1]);
close(fd[0]);
if (execvp(arglist[index+1], arglist+index+1) < 0) { //execute the second part of the commands
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: execvp failed\n");
exit(1);
}
exit(1);
} else { //Parent's process
close(fd[0]);
close(fd[1]);
waitpid(pid, 0, 0);
return 1;
}
}
}
//No & and no |
if (flagBg == 0 && flagPipe == 0) {
int pid = fork();
if (pid < 0) { //check if fork failed
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: fork failed\n");
return 1;
}
if (pid == 0) {
if (execvp(*arglist, arglist) < 0) { //execute the command
fprintf(stderr, "ERROR: execvp failed\n");
exit(1);
}
} else {
waitpid(pid, 0, 0);
return 1;
}
}
return 0;
}
答案 0 :(得分:0)
您不需要使用SIGINT
sighandler向正确的孩子重新发送SIGINT
。如果您在单独的进程组中运行每个作业并使用tcsetpgrp
设置终端的前台进程组,则Ctrl+C
应该使终端将SIGINT
发送到相应的进程组对你而言。
答案 1 :(得分:0)
我的想法是将SIGINT的默认处理程序设置为SIG_IGN,并将其更改为另一个在我运行前台进程时终止的处理程序。但是我不明白我应该在代码中放置处理程序的位置。
您只是没有按照您的想法编写代码。要更改运行前台流程时的处理方式,请将let list = document.getElementById('transcribers');
let proofingLevel = list.options[list.selectedIndex].getAttribute('data-id-proofinglevel');`
从sigaction(SIGINT, &intSig, NULL);
的开头移到前台流程的三个地方process_arglist()
被称为。