我有以下Java类,我试图转换为使用泛型的Kotlin。
抽象类MvpViewHolder,M,V:View?>(itemView:View):RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView){
public abstract class MvpViewHolder<P extends BasePresenter> extends RecyclerView.ViewHolder {
protected P presenter;
public MvpViewHolder(View itemView) {
super(itemView);
}
public void bindPresenter(P presenter) {
this.presenter = presenter;
presenter.bindView(this);
}
public void unbindPresenter() {
presenter = null;
}
}
这是我的Kotlin尝试
abstract class MvpViewHolder<P : BasePresenter>(itemView: View) : RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView) {
protected var presenter: P? = null
fun bindPresenter(presenter: P?): Unit {
this.presenter = presenter
presenter?.bindView(this)
}
fun unbindPresenter(): Unit {
this.presenter = null
}
}
我特别遇到了泛型问题。事实证明,在Kotlin中,由于Kotlin要求我们传递BasePresenter的2个类型参数(我在下面的实现中),所以MvpViewHolder<P : BasePresenter>
根本不够;
但是,如果我需要传入BasePresenter的类型参数,那么我的方法签名就像这样
`abstract class MvpViewHolder<P : BasePresenter<*, *>>(itemView: View) : RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView) {`
但这对我没有帮助,因为在presenter.bindView(this)
我收到类型错误Required: Nothing, Found: MvpViewHolder
我也可以更具体,并传入
MvpViewHolder<P: BasePresenter<M, V>, M, V>
但那意味着无论我在哪里调用MvpViewHolder,我都必须包含2个额外的类型参数。现在不仅需要维持,这不仅乏味,而且让我感到难过。
当我使用BasePresenter&lt; ,&gt;时,如何摆脱错误?或者避免将3种类型的参数传递到我的MvpViewHolder类中,这样我就可以将P定义为BasePresenter
abstract class BasePresenter<M, V> {
var model: M? = null
var view: WeakReference<V>? = null
fun setM(model: M?): Unit {
this.model = model
if (setupDone()) {
updateView()
}
}
fun bindView(view: V) {
this.view = WeakReference(view)
}
fun unbindView() {
this.view = null
}
abstract fun updateView()
fun view(): V? {
return if (view == null) null else view?.get()
}
fun setupDone(): Boolean {
return view() != null && model != null
}
}
答案 0 :(得分:1)
将抽象类更改为以下代码
abstract class MvpViewHolder<P :BasePresenter<P,MvpViewHolder<P>>>(itemView: View) : RecyclerView.ViewHolder(itemView) {
protected var presenter: P? = null
fun bindPresenter(presenter: P) {
this.presenter = presenter
presenter.bindView(this)
}
fun unbindPresenter() {
presenter = null
}
}