Question

来自socket_resolve.cc中的测试代码，具有相同平台和相同二进制文件的SbSocketResolveTest.IgnoreExtraBits测试用例11将是概率失败（有时会通过）可以看出，当过滤器设置为1 <＆lt; 14或0时，它将都进入第68行（hints.ai_family = AF_UNSPEC;第39行），但对于相同的主机名，第一次获得2个IP地址（ 1 IPV4,1 IPV6 ），第二次获得5个IP地址（ 1 IPV4,4 IPV6 ），然后因为测试用例而失败认为ip地址号应该相同，所以测试测试用例本身似乎有问题，有人可以帮忙看一下吗？

[ RUN      ] SbSocketResolveTest.IgnoreExtraBits
[AAAAA]in SbSocketResolve at 53 in ../../third_party/starboard/shared/posix/socket_resolve.cc, filters=16384
[AAAAA]in SbSocketResolve at 67 in ../../third_party/starboard/shared/posix/socket_resolve.cc
getaddrinfo response 0
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v4
        IPv4 addr 203.188.200.67
getaddrinfo response 1
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v6
        IPv6 addr 2406:2000:ec:c00::1001
[AAAAA]in SbSocketResolve at 53 in ../../third_party/starboard/shared/posix/socket_resolve.cc, filters=0
[AAAAA]in SbSocketResolve at 67 in ../../third_party/starboard/shared/posix/socket_resolve.cc
getaddrinfo response 0
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v4
        IPv4 addr 203.188.200.67
getaddrinfo response 1
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v6
        IPv6 addr 2001:4998:c:e33::53
getaddrinfo response 2
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v6
        IPv6 addr 2001:4998:44:204::100d
getaddrinfo response 3
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v6
        IPv6 addr 2001:4998:44:204::a7
getaddrinfo response 4
        Flags: 0x20
        Family: AF_INET v6
        IPv6 addr 2001:4998:c:e33::54
../../starboard/nplb/socket_resolve_test.cc:80: Failure
Value of: resolution1->address_count
  Actual: 2
Expected: resolution2->address_count
Which is: 5
[  FAILED  ] SbSocketResolveTest.IgnoreExtraBits (5203 ms)


  [1]: https://cobalt.googlesource.com/cobalt/+/release_11/src/starboard/shared/posix/socket_resolve.cc

使用NPLB测试SbSocketResolveTest.IgnoreExtraBits失败

0 个答案: