如何检查Fragment.onAttach()中的类型回调类型

时间:2017-10-14 14:53:11

标签: java android android-fragments generics inheritance

我正在尝试使用类型化回调实现抽象片段,以便在多个子类中使用它。

如何检查Context是否是适当类的实例?

我的抽象代码CallbackFragment:

public abstract class CallbackFragment<C> extends Fragment {

    protected C mCallback;

    public CallbackFragment() {
    }

    @Override
    public void onAttach(Context context) {
        super.onAttach(context);

        //just in case
        if(context == null)
            throw new NullPointerException();

        try {
            mCallback = (C) context; //this line not seems to throw any exception
        } catch (ClassCastException exception) {
            throw new RuntimeException(context.toString() + " must implement Callbacks");
        }
    }

    @Override
    public void onDetach() {
        super.onDetach();
        mCallback = null;
    }
}

车辆清单片段:

public abstract class VehicleListFragment<T extends Vehicle>
        extends CallbackFragment<VehicleListFragment.Callback<T>> {

    //callback for any list of any vehicle
    public interface Callback<T extends Vehicle> {
        void onListItemSelected(T selectedItem);
    }

    //common code for list of any vehicle
    public VehicleListFragment() {
    }
}

巴士,卡车,船,自行车,无论是什么列表片段:

public class BusListFragment
    extends VehicleListFragment<Bus> {

    //code specific for list of bus
    public BusListFragment() {
    }
}

车辆详细信息片段:

public abstract class VehicleDetailsFragment<T extends Vehicle, C extends VehicleDetailsFragment.Callback<T>>
        extends CallbackFragment<C> {

    //common methods of callback for any vehicle
    public interface Callback<T> {
        void onVehicleEdited(T editeItem);
    }

    //common code for any vehicle
    public VehicleDetailsFragment() {
    }
}

巴士,卡车,船,自行车,无论细节如何:

public class BusDetailsFragment
        extends VehicleDetailsFragment<Bus, BusDetailsFragment.Callback> {

    //specific for Bus methods
    public interface Callback
            extends VehicleDetailsFragment.Callback<Bus> {
        void onSomethingSpecificForBusHappened(Bus bus);
    }

    //code specific for Bus
    public BusDetailsFragment() {
    }
}

我试图为CallbackFragment添加一个抽象方法来获取回调类:

public abstract class CallbackFragment<C> extends Fragment {

    ...

    @NonNull
    protected abstract Class<C> getCallbackClass();

    @Override
    public void onAttach(Context context) {
        super.onAttach(context);
        ...

        //now checking instanceof like this
        if(!getCallbackClass().isAssignableFrom(context.getClass())){
            throw new RuntimeException(context.toString() + " must implement Callbacks");
        }
    }
}

使用BusDetailsFragment,一切看起来都不错:

public class BusDetailsFragment
        extends VehicleDetailsFragment<Bus, BusDetailsFragment.Callback> {

    @NonNull
    @Override
    protected Class<Callback> getCallbackClass() {
        return Callback.class;
    }

    ...
}

但不是BusListFragment:

public class BusListFragment
        extends VehicleListFragment<Bus> {

    @NonNull
    @Override
    protected Class<Callback<Bus>> getCallbackClass() {
        /**
         * I'm not seeing any option here
         *
         * mCallback - is null yet. So, there is no way to use mCallback.getClass()
         *
         * Callback<Bus>.class - Cannot select from parameterized type
         */
        //return mCallback.getClass();
        //return Callback<Bus>.class;
    }

    ...
}

当然,我可以为VehicleListFragment的每个子类创建一个自己的接口,扩展VehicleListFragment.Callback(就像在VehicleDetailsFragment的子类中一样),但它总是如下所示:

public interface Callback
        extends VehicleListFragment.Callback<Bus> {
    //nothing more here
}

这对我来说不是最好的选择。 也许有其他解决方案?请分享您的想法。任何帮助将不胜感激。

1 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:2)

mCallback = (C) context; //this line not seems to throw any exception

此调用永远不会抛出异常。在运行时,C替换为Object(称为类型删除) - 一切都是Object。因此,您可以在此时指定任何内容。

要在您需要的地点进行异常(或至少是错误确定),您可以使用:

public abstract class CallbackFragment<C> extends Fragment {

    protected C mCallback;
    protected Class<C> callbackClass;

    public CallbackFragment(Class<C> clazz) {
       this.callbackClass = clazz;
    }

    @Override
    public void onAttach(Context context) {
        super.onAttach(context);

        //just in case
        if(context == null)
            throw new NullPointerException();

        if (clazz.isAssignableFrom(context.getClass()){
            mCallback = (C) context;  
        }else{
           //oops
        }
    }
}

OFC。然后你的FragmentCreation会改变

 CallbackFragment<Something> fragment = new CallbackFragment<Something>();

CallbackFragment<Something> fragment = new CallbackFragment<Something>(Something.class);

它有点不同,但允许您随时保留跟踪实际类型,绕过类型擦除。

ps。:对于 Inherited 类,您可以更通用:

public abstract class CallbackFragment<C> extends Fragment {
    protected Class<C> callbackClass;

    public CallbackFragment() {
          this.callbackClass = (Class<C>) ((ParameterizedType) getClass()
                        .getGenericSuperclass()).getActualTypeArguments()[0];;
     }
}

public class CallbackFragmentOfSomething extends <CallbackFragment<Something>>{

}

这只会失败,如果您的实际类由于继承而未定义,但是“在运行中”:

CallbackFragment<Something> fragment = new CallbackFragment<Something>();

(一切未经测试/没有复制粘贴,但应该有些准确)