我遇到了一个我无法解决的问题。 例如,我有表,行,id,季节,剧集,顺序。 表中的数据如下所示:
+--------+---------------+----------------+--------------+
| id | season | episode | order |
+--------+---------------+----------------+--------------+
| 153914 | 1 | 1 | NULL |
| 153915 | 1 | 3 | NULL |
| 153916 | 1 | 2 | NULL |
| 153919 | 1 | 3 | NULL |
| 153920 | 1 | 4 | NULL |
| 153921 | 1 | 3 | NULL |
+--------+---------------+----------------+--------------+
因此,当我在没有UPDATE的情况下运行SELECT查询时,行顺序绝对正确排序
SELECT id, season, episode, (@row:=@row+1) as order
FROM `shows`, (select @row:=0) as rc
WHERE `show_id`= 14670
ORDER BY CAST(season AS UNSIGNED) ASC, CAST(episode AS UNSIGNED) ASC
+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| id | season | episode | order |
+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| 153914 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 153916 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 153915 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
| 153919 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 153921 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| 153920 | 1 | 4 | 6 |
+--------+--------+---------+--------+
但是当我使用与UPDATE语句的子查询相同的查询时,它不会以相同的方式排序并设置不同的顺序值。
UPDATE `shows` f
JOIN
(
SELECT id, (@row:=@row+1) as rowOrder
FROM `shows` as Fl, (select @row:=0) as rc
WHERE Fl.`show_id` = 14670
ORDER BY Fl.season ASC, Fl.episode ASC
) t
ON t.id = f.id
SET f.order = t.rowOrder
mysql> SELECT id, season, episode, order FROM `shows` WHERE `show_id`=14670;
+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| id | season | episode | order |
+--------+--------+---------+--------+
| 153914 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 153915 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
| 153916 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| 153919 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| 153920 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
| 153921 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
+--------+--------+---------+--------+
请向我解释为什么会发生以及如何解决它。 MySQL版本:
>mysql --version
mysql Ver 14.14 Distrib 5.7.18, for Linux (x86_64) using EditLine wrapper
答案 0 :(得分:1)
嗯。似乎order by
不会影响变量。我想知道在最近的MySQL版本中是否有所改变。它当然习惯了。
在任何情况下,您都可以使用子查询修复它:
UPDATE shows s JOIN
(SELECT id, (@row:=@row+1) as rowOrder
FROM (SELECT id, sea
FROM shows s2
WHERE s2.show_id = 14670
ORDER BY s2.season ASC, s2.episode ASC
) s2 CROSS JOIN
(SELECT @row := 0) as rc
) s3
ON s.id = s3.id
SET s.order = s3.rowOrder;