我想知道当我使用相互引用的泛型类时,是否有办法消除rawtypes警告:
public class DummyDeleteMe {
abstract class RightSide<L extends LeftSide>{ //Can I use a type parameter here?
L getLeftSide() {return _mate;}
void setLeftSide(L mate) {_mate = mate;}
L _mate;
void connectToMate(){
getLeftSide().setRightSide(this);//warning:
/** [unchecked] unchecked call to setRightSide(R) as a member of the raw type DummyDeleteMe.LeftSide
where R is a type-variable: * **/
}
}
abstract class LeftSide<R extends RightSide>{// And here?
R getRightSide(){return _mate;}
void setRightSide(R mate) {_mate = mate;}
R _mate;
}
class RightSideSub extends RightSide<LeftSideSub>{
void connectToMate(){
getLeftSide().setRightSide(this);//No warning
}
}
class LeftSideSub extends LeftSide<RightSideSub>{}
}
编译器警告是因为参数绑定中的LeftSide
是原始类型。用LeftSide<?>
替换它会导致connectToMate
出错。覆盖connectToMate
中的RightSideSub
,相同的代码不会生成警告。
我想我正在寻找某种第二种类型的参数,即自我参照:
abstract class RightSide<R extends RightSide<R,L>, L extends LeftSide<L,R>>{}
但是这会导致返回R
的{{1}}变量和方法中的其他类型不匹配错误。
答案 0 :(得分:4)
我知道这可能不是你想要的,但它可以解决你的问题。仅基于您在代码示例中显示的内容,根本不需要通用。这让问题复杂化了。也就是说,如果您的示例与您需要的内容相当匹配。
假设是,那么这样的事情。
public interface Half{
public Half getOtherHalf();
}
public class RightSide implements Half{
private LeftSide leftSide;
public void setLeftSide(LeftSide leftSide){
this.leftSide = leftSide;
}
@Override
public LeftSide getOtherHalf() {
return leftSide;
}
}
public class LeftSide implements Half{
private RightSide rightSide;
public void setRightSide(RightSide rightSide){
this.rightSide = rightSide;
}
@Override
public RightSide getOtherHalf(){
return rightSide;
}
}
答案 1 :(得分:0)
这是一个解决方案。我已删除了对“左侧”的L
和“右侧”的R
的引用,并将其替换为T
表示“此方”而O
替换为“另一方” “
public class Solution1 {
abstract static class Side<T extends Side<T, O>, O extends Side<O, T>> {
Side<O, T> _mate = null;
Side<O, T> getOtherSide() {
return _mate;
}
void setOtherSide(Side<O, T> mate) {
_mate = mate;
}
void connectToMate() {
getOtherSide().setOtherSide(this);
}
}
//You concrete implementations can replace This and Other
//with Right and Left as you see fit.
static class RightSideSub extends Side<RightSideSub, LeftSideSub> {
}
static class LeftSideSub extends Side<LeftSideSub, RightSideSub> {
}
}
但是,我建议采用另一种更简单的解决方案,代价是放弃connectToMate()
方法并将其替换为下面main()
方法中的代码:
class OtherSolution{
abstract static class Side<O>{
O _mate = null;
void setOtherSide(O mate){
_mate = mate;
}
}
static class RightSideSub extends Side<LeftSideSub> {
}
static class LeftSideSub extends Side<RightSideSub> {
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
RightSideSub rs = new RightSideSub();
LeftSideSub ls = new LeftSideSub();
//do the connectToMate() operation externally like this:
rs.setOtherSide(ls);
ls.setOtherSide(rs);
}
}