以下示例在64位桌面Ubuntu 16.04上正确加密和解密为相同的原始字符串,但是当在Raspberry Pi(ARM)(以及另一个自定义Linux ARM板)上编译和运行相同的代码时,它会失败解密到原始字符串。 Raspberry Pi和其他ARM板都解密为相同但不正确的值。
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <openssl/aes.h>
#include <openssl/crypto.h>
/* AES key for Encryption and Decryption */
const static unsigned char aes_key[]={0x00,0x11,0x22,0x33,0x44,0x55,0x66,0x77,0x88,0x99,0xAA,0xBB,0xCC,0xDD,0xEE,0xFF};
/* Print Encrypted and Decrypted data packets */
void print_data(const char *tittle, const void* data, int len);
int main( )
{
/* Input data to encrypt */
unsigned char aes_input[]={0x0,0x1,0x2,0x3,0x4,0x5};
fprintf(stderr,"%s\n",SSLeay_version(SSLEAY_VERSION));
/* Init vector */
unsigned char iv[AES_BLOCK_SIZE];
memset(iv, 0x00, AES_BLOCK_SIZE);
/* Buffers for Encryption and Decryption */
unsigned char enc_out[sizeof(aes_input)];
unsigned char dec_out[sizeof(aes_input)];
/* AES-128 bit CBC Encryption */
AES_KEY enc_key, dec_key;
AES_set_encrypt_key(aes_key, sizeof(aes_key)*8, &enc_key);
AES_cbc_encrypt(aes_input, enc_out, sizeof(aes_input), &enc_key, iv, AES_ENCRYPT);
/* AES-128 bit CBC Decryption */
memset(iv, 0x00, AES_BLOCK_SIZE); // don't forget to set iv vector again, else you can't decrypt data properly
AES_set_decrypt_key(aes_key, sizeof(aes_key)*8, &dec_key); // Size of key is in bits
AES_cbc_encrypt(enc_out, dec_out, sizeof(aes_input), &dec_key, iv, AES_DECRYPT);
/* Printing and Verifying */
print_data("\n Original ",aes_input, sizeof(aes_input)); // you can not print data as a string, because after Encryption its not ASCII
print_data("\n Encrypted",enc_out, sizeof(enc_out));
print_data("\n Decrypted",dec_out, sizeof(dec_out));
return 0;
}
void print_data(const char *tittle, const void* data, int len)
{
printf("%s : ",tittle);
const unsigned char * p = (const unsigned char*)data;
int i = 0;
for (; i<len; ++i)
printf("%02X ", *p++);
printf("\n");
}
Ubuntu结果:
OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014
Original : 00 01 02 03 04 05
Encrypted : D5 40 D0 BB 16 1D
Decrypted : 00 01 02 03 04 05
Raspberry Pi结果:
OpenSSL 1.0.2l 25 May 2017
Original : 00 01 02 03 04 05
Encrypted : D5 40 D0 BB 16 1D
Decrypted : D3 87 81 20 2B B9
自定义板结果:
OpenSSL 1.1.0f 25 May 2017
Original : 00 01 02 03 04 05
Encrypted : D5 40 D0 BB 16 1D
Decrypted : D3 87 81 20 2B B9
自定义板(更新的OpenSSL以匹配Ubuntu):
OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014
Original : 00 01 02 03 04 05
Encrypted : D5 40 D0 BB 16 1D
Decrypted : D3 87 81 20 2B B9
为什么开源libcrypto在Ubuntu和2台不同的ARM机器上的行为不一样?
答案 0 :(得分:1)
通常在CBC模式下,使用大小为缓冲区块大小倍数的缓冲区。这是CBC的本质,它在CBC类型例程的每个openssl手册页中都有提及(遗憾的是我在AES_cbc_encrypt
上找不到手册页或任何文档。)
错误的缓冲区大小似乎可以通过纯粹的运气在某些平台上运行。要查看实际发生的情况,请为enc_out
分配一个字节,并在加密后将该额外字节归零。解密会失败。
unsigned char enc_out[sizeof(aes_input) + 1];
...
AES_cbc_encrypt(aes_input, enc_out, sizeof(aes_input), &enc_key, iv, AES_ENCRYPT);
enc_out[sizeof(aes_input)] = 0;
在我的机器上输出修改后的代码:
Original : 00 01 02 03 04 05
Encrypted : D5 40 D0 BB 16 1D 00
Decrypted : 89 FB 06 F4 CD 6A
未修改的代码会生成“正确”的输出。