Question

我喜欢＆＃39;泛型＆＃39;通过提供自定义实例来有效地专业化的地图数据结构，就像在the GHC manual section on type families中一样。

{-# LANGUAGE FlexibleInstances    #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies         #-}
{-# LANGUAGE UndecidableInstances #-}

module MapKey where

import           Data.Map.Strict    (Map)
import qualified Data.Map.Strict    as Map

class MapKey k where
  data MMap k :: * -> *

instance {-# OVERLAPPING #-} MapKey () where
  newtype MMap () v = UnitMap (Maybe v)

instance {-# OVERLAPPABLE #-} Ord k => MapKey k where
  newtype MMap k v = OrdMap (Map k v)

可悲的是，这不起作用。 GHC（8.2.1）抱怨：

    Conflicting family instance declarations:
      MMap () = UnitMap (Maybe v)
      MMap = OrdMap (Map k v)
   |
14 |   newtype MMap () v = UnitMap (Maybe v)
   |

是否有一些语言扩展允许这个？否则，还有另一种方法可以让用户轻松定义“默认值”。 Ord的实例？

Answer 1

放弃重叠实例的一个解决方案是使用默认关联的内射类型族（非常满口）。我还为默认的MMap同义词附加了一些默认实现的方法：

{-# LANGUAGE DefaultSignatures      #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilies           #-}
{-# LANGUAGE TypeFamilyDependencies #-}

module MapKey where

import           Data.Map.Strict    (Map)
import qualified Data.Map.Strict    as Map

class MapKey k where
  type MMap k v = r | r -> k v
  type MMap k v = Map k v
  empty :: MMap k v
  default empty :: (MMap k v ~ Map k v) => MMap k v
  empty = Map.empty
  insert :: k -> v -> MMap k v -> MMap k v
  default insert :: (MMap k v ~ Map k v, Ord k) => k -> v -> MMap k v -> MMap k v
  insert = Map.insert
  lookupLE :: k -> MMap k v -> [(k, v)]
  default lookupLE :: (MMap k v ~ Map k v, Ord k) => k -> MMap k v -> [(k, v)]
  lookupLE k m =
    case Map.lookupLE k m of
      Nothing -> []
      Just e -> [e]

instance MapKey () where
  type MMap () v = Maybe v
  empty = Nothing
  insert _ v _ = Just v
  lookupLE _ m =
    case m of
      Nothing  -> []
      (Just v) -> [((), v)]

这意味着客户端代码仍然需要定义样板孤立实例，如

instance MapKey Int

我宁愿看到使用重叠实例的解决方案。

关联数据系列和重叠实例

1 个答案: