Java通过listNode问题

时间:2017-09-05 15:21:58

标签: java assign

我有一个班级:

class ListNode {
     int val;
     ListNode next;
     ListNode(int x) { val = x; }
}

打印LinkedList的功能是:

public static void printLinkedNode(ListNode l){
        while(l != null){
            System.out.print(l.val+" ");
            l = l.next;
        }
        System.out.println(" ");
    }

在我的main函数中,我创建了一个名为test的ListNode:

ListNode test = new ListNode(1);
head.next = new ListNode(2);
head.next.next = new ListNode(3);
head.next.next.next = new ListNode(4);

如果我做A:

ListNode fast = head, slow = head;
fast = fast.next.next;
printLinkedNode(head); // I get 1->2->3->4

如果我做B:

ListNode fast = head, slow = head;
fast.next = fast.next.next;
printLinkedNode(head); // I get 1->3->4

我很困惑为什么在A中,头部是1-> 2-> 3-> 4,但不是3-> 4?我已经阅读了一些关于Is Java “pass-by-reference” or “pass-by-value”?的帖子,但仍然无法弄明白......

如果我做C:

            ListNode fast = head, slow = head;
            fast = fast.next.next;
            printLinkedNode(fast);   //3->4
            printLinkedNode(head);   //1->2->3->4
            fast.next = new ListNode(5);
            printLinkedNode(fast);   //3->5
            printLinkedNode(head);   //1->2->3->5, why the head will change?

我很困惑为什么当我们做fast.next = new ListNode(5)时头部会改变?我认为快速不是用头分配的吗?

2 个答案:

答案 0 :(得分:5)

当您指定变量时,您可以将其指向(引用)特定对象。当你重新分配它时,你将它指向(引用)另一个对象,你不会覆盖它所持有的参考值:

ListNode fast = head, slow = head; // fast has a reference to head.
fast = fast.next.next;             // fast has a reference to fast.next.next. You are not overwriting head, just fast.
printLinkedNode(head); // I get 1->2->3->4

相反,如果您在内部编辑引用的对象,则您将编辑原始对象:

ListNode fast = head, slow = head; // fast has a reference to head
fast.next = fast.next.next;        // by editing fast.next, you edit head.next
printLinkedNode(head); // I get 1->3->4

用例C的更新:

ListNode fast = head, slow = head; // fast = head = (1)
fast = fast.next.next;             // fast = fast.next.next = (3). head is still (1)
printLinkedNode(fast);             // 3->4 -> because fast points to head.next.next (3)
printLinkedNode(head);             // 1->2->3->4 -> head wasn't modified by any of the previous instructions

// here fast points to head.next.next. So fast.next is the same as head.next.next.next (4).
fast.next = new ListNode(5);       // Overwrites fast.next, it was (4), becomes (5)
printLinkedNode(fast);             // 3->5
printLinkedNode(head);             // 1->2->3->5

为了更容易理解:

我们假设我们有a类型的对象bcListNode

ListNode a = new ListNode(1);
ListNode b = new ListNode(2);
ListNode c = new ListNode(3);

ListNode d = a; // variable d now points to object a
d.next = b;     // since d points to a, this statement modifies a.next
d = c           // This does *not* modify a. It just makes d point to c.

答案 1 :(得分:0)

好问题,我也搞砸了 ListNode 引用/分配。

试试下面的用例,这会帮助你理解它。此示例可以与 ListNode 进行比较。

List<Integer> listA = new ArrayList<>();
listA.add(20);
List<Integer> listB = new ArrayList<>();
listB.add(30);
System.out.println("listA: " + listA);
System.out.println("listB: " + listB);

// assign list and it has a reference to listA
List<Integer> list = listA;

// re-assign list and it has a reference to listB now
list = listB;

/* modify list, listB will be changed too. Similar in ListNode class, e.g. ListNode dummy = head;
if you do dummy.next = ListNodeC or dummy.val = xxx, head's pointer and value will be changed too. */
list.add(88);

// you could see here listA is not changed since we have re-assign it with listB, now it points to listB.
System.out.println("listA: " + listA);
System.out.println("listB: " + listB);
System.out.println("list:  " + list);